Facilitate active learning: The role of perceived benefits of using technology

References

• Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian perceived online transaction benefit. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644–656. doi:10.1086/209376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartsch, R., & Murphy, W. (2011). Examining the effects of an electronic classroom response system on student engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44, 25–33. doi:10.2190/EC.44.1.b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, J. M., & Kumar, M. (2010). Using SMS text messaging to create individualized and interactive experiences in large classes: A beer game example. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8, 129–136. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2009.00247.x
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., & Eastman, K. L. (2011). Business students' perceptions, attitudes, and satisfaction with interactive technology: An exploratory study. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 36–43. doi:10.1080/08832321003774756
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192. doi:10.2307/3172650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., & Renna, F. (2009). Using electronic response systems in economics classes. Journal of Economic Education, 40, 354–365. doi:10.1080/00220480903297651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R. H., Cohen, A. P., & Sheahan, F. (2008). Using seminar blogs to enhance student participation and learning in public health school classes. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1658–1663. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.133694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazari, S., Brown, C. O., & Rutledge, R. (2013). Investigating marketing students' perceptions of active learning and social collaboration in blogs. Journal of Education for Business, 88, 101–108. doi:10.1080/08832323.2011.654141
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140. doi:10.1086/208906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, G. A., & Norman, C. S. (2011). Textbook websites: User technology acceptance behavior. Behavior & Information Technology, 30, 147–159. doi:10.1080/01449290903353021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, M., & Reid, K. (2009). Modularizing information literacy training via the Blackboard eCommunity. Journal of Library Administration, 49, 1–9. doi:10.1080/01930820802310502
   Google Scholar
• Land, S. M., & Green, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the world wide web: A quantitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48, 45–68. doi:10.1007/BF02313485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, B. J. L., Griffeth, R., & Hartman, S. (2006). Measuring student perceptions of blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4, 87–99. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00103.x
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 175–182.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. J. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, B., D'Alessandro, S., Winzar, H., Laffey, D., & Collier, W. (2013). The use of Web 2.0 technologies in marketing classes: Key drivers of student acceptance. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 12, 412–422. doi:10.1002/cb.1444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, C. A., & Schreiner, L. A. (2004). Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis by student race/ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 549–565. doi:10.1353/csd.2004.0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, N. J., Campbell, C., Bal, A. S., & Piercy, N. (2011). Placing a hand in the fire: Assessing the impact of a YouTube experiential learning project on viral marketing knowledge acquisition. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 204–216. doi:10.1177/0273475311410853
   Google Scholar
• Peltier, J. W., Hay, A., & Drago, W. A. (2006). Reflecting on reflection: Scale extension and a comparison of undergraduate business students in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 5–16. doi:10.1177/0273475305279658
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, S. B., Tapp, S., & Laverie, D. A. (2011). Learning by tweeting: Using Twitter as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 193–203. doi:10.1177/0273475311410852
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, E., & Dahl, D. (2010). Learning to click: An evaluation of the personal response system clicker technology in introductory marketing courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 93–103. doi:10.1177/0273475309344806
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, D. (2013). Can technology improve large class learning? The case of an upper-division business core class. Journal of Education for Business, 88, 265–270. doi:10.1080/08832323.2012.692735
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, R. (1997). Self-fulfilling prophecy: A practical guide to its use in education. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twale, D., & Sanders, C. S. (1999). Impact of non-classroom experiences on critical thinking ability. NASPA Journal, 36, 133–146. doi:10.2202/0027-6014.1078
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., & Yoo, Y. (2004). It's all about attitude: Revisiting the Technology Acceptance Model. Decision Support Systems, 38, 19–31. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00062-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yourstone, S., Kraye, H., & Albaum, G. (2008). Class questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning? Decision Science Journal of Innovative Education, 6, 75–88. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00166.x
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. J., Alexander, M. W., Perreault, H., Waldman, L., & Truell, A. D. (2009). Faculty and student use of technologies, user productivity, and user preference in distance education. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 206–212. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.4.206-212
   Google Scholar
• Wyss, J., Lee, S. E., Domna, T., & MacGillivray, M. (2014). Cotton island: Students' learning motivation using a virtual world. Decision Science Journal of Innovative Education, 12, 219–232. doi:10.1111/dsji.12036
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. M., Rose, D. N., Dubrowski, A., Ling, S. C., Grierson, L. E., Backstein, D., & Carnahan, H. (2011). Learning in the simulated setting: A comparison of expert-, peer-, and computer-assisted learning. Academy Medicine, 86, 12–16. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a72c7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar