An experiential approach to teaching mixed methods research

References

• Achenreiner, G. (2001). Market research in the “real” world: Are we teaching students what they need to know? Marketing Education Review, 11(1), 15–25. doi:10.1080/10528008.2001.11488727
   Google Scholar
• Allison, B. J., Voss, R. S., & Dryer, S. (2001). Student classroom and career success: The role of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5), 282–288. doi:10.1080/08832320109599650
   Google Scholar
• Askim-Lovseth, M. K., & O’Keefe, T. P. (2012). Enhancing the interdisciplinary perspective in the marketing management decision process through an applied, integrated, client project. Marketing Education Review, 22(1), 61–66. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008220110
   Google Scholar
• Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2017). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/standards/business-accreditation-2017-update.ashx?la=en.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2016). Reporting actual and perceived student learning in education research. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(1), 3–6. doi:10.1177/0273475316636732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 313–328. doi:10.1080/0729436042000235427
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, E. (1999). Experiential learning and customer needs in the undergraduate marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(1), 51–59. doi:10.1177/0273475399211007
   Google Scholar
• Cadwallader, S., Atwong, C., & Lebard, A. (2013). Proposing community-based learning in the marketing curriculum. Marketing Education Review, 23(2), 137–150. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008230203
   Google Scholar
• Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/FINAL_REPORT_PDF09-29-06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L., & Kaminski, P. (1986). Bringing a reality into the classroom: The team approach to a client-financed marketing research project. Journal of Education for Business, 62(2), 61–65. doi:10.1080/08832323.1986.10772773
   Google Scholar
• Corsini, L. S., Crittenden, V. L., Keeley, R. C., Trompeter, G. M., & Viechnicki, B. (2000). Integrating cross-functional undergraduate teaching and learning: A work in progress. Marketing Education Review, 10(3), 1–17. doi:10.1080/10528008.2000.11488715
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden, V. L., & Wilson, E. J. (2006). An exploratory study of cross-functional education in the undergraduate marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(1), 81–86. doi:10.1177/0273475305284643
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, A. J., Peltier, J. W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2018). Critical thinking and reflective learning in the marketing education literature: A historical perspective and future research needs. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Darian, J. C., & Coopersmith, L. (2001). Integrated marketing and operations team projects: Learning the importance of cross-functional cooperation. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(2), 128–135. doi:10.1177/0273475301232006
   Google Scholar
• Dobni, D., & Links, G. (2008). Promoting statistical intelligence in marketing research students: Best practice ideas. Marketing Education Review, 18(1), 61–64. doi:10.1080/10528008.2008.11489026
   Google Scholar
• Elbeck, M., & Bacon, D. (2015). Toward universal definitions for direct and indirect assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 90(5), 278–283. doi:10.1080/08832323.2015.1034064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, D., Nadeau, J., & O’Reilly, N. (2013). The future of marketing education: A practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Marketing Education, 35(1), 54–67. doi:10.1177/0273475312465091
   Google Scholar
• Frontczak, N. T. (1998). A paradigm for the selection, use and development of experiential learning activities in marketing education. Marketing Education Review, 8(3), 25–33. doi:10.1080/10528008.1998.11488641
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 74). San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre, L., Freeman, L., Jaskari, M. M., & Cadwallader, S. (2017). Editors’ corner: The “work-ready” marketing graduate. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(2), 67–68. doi:10.1177/0273475317712411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, L. (2009). Teaching partnering strategies through the client-based project approach. Marketing Education Review, 19(1), 49–55. doi:10.1080/10528008.2009.11489060
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, F. A., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Maintaining initial interests: Developing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career aspirations among underrepresented racial minority students. In Association for Educational Research Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S., Newman, C. B., Tran, M. C., & Chang, M. J. (2010). Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 5–15. doi:10.1002/ir.357
   Google Scholar
• Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. doi:10.2307/2392366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Yamauchi, Y. (2008). Beyond the university: Teaching ethnographic methods in the corporation. Anthropology News, 49(6), 35. doi:10.1111/an.2008.49.6.35
   Google Scholar
• Klink, R. R., & Athaide, G. A. (2004). Implementing service learning in the principles of marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(2), 145–153. doi:10.1177/0273475304265546
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1976). Management and the learning process. California Management Review, 18(3), 21–31. doi:10.2307/41164649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Princeton, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Laukkanen, M., Mattila, P., Salo, J., & Tikkanen, H. (2013). Using live cases for teaching, industry collaboration, and research. Marketing Education Review, 23(1), 65–72. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008230111
   Google Scholar
• LeClair, D. (2018). Integrating business analytics in the marketing curriculum: Eight recommendations. Marketing Education Review, 28(1), 6–13. doi:10.1080/10528008.2017.1421050
   Google Scholar
• Leximancer. (2018). Leximancer: From words to meaning to insight. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://info.leximancer.com.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., & Burns, A. C. (2018). Designing a marketing analytics course for the digital age. Marketing Education Review, 28(1), 28–40. doi:10.1080/10528008.2017.1421049
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, T. B., & Lee, R. G. (2005). Five principles for workable client-based projects: Lessons from the trenches. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(2), 172–188. doi:10.1177/0273475305276840
   Google Scholar
• Maher, J. K., & Hughner, R. (2005). Experiential marketing projects: Student perceptions of live case and simulation methods. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 7, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., Dixit, A., & Uslay, C. (2002). Integrating internet technology in marketing research education. Marketing Education Review, 12(3), 25–34. doi:10.1080/10528008.2002.11488797
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P. R., & McCarthy, H. M. (2006). When case studies are not enough: Integrating experiential learning into business curricula. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 201–204. doi:10.3200/JOEB.81.4.201-204
   Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, P. J., & Liu, C. (2017). Application of mixed methods by consumer marketing practitioners: Lessons for the academy? Abstract. In Stieler, M. (Ed.) Creating marketing magic and innovative future marketing trends. Developments in marketing science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science.
   Google Scholar
• McGorry, S. Y. (2006). Data in the palm of your hand. Marketing Education Review, 16(3), 83–90. doi:10.1080/10528008.2006.11488977
   Google Scholar
• McInnis-Bowers, C., Chew, E. B., & Bowers, M. R. (2010). Using reflective thinking to enhance decision skills, cultural sensitivity, and teamwork. Marketing Education Review, 20(1), 17–20. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008200103
   Google Scholar
• McKee, D. (1991). A cognitive style framework for marketing education program development. Marketing Education Review, 1(3), 10–19. doi:10.1080/10528008.1991.11488315
   Google Scholar
• McKim, C. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202–222. doi:10.1177/1558689815607096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, V., & Hoover, R. (1999). The application of shareholder value analysis to the marketing strategy case. Marketing Education Review, 9(3), 5–14. doi:10.1080/10528008.1999.11488679
   Google Scholar
• Mintu-Wimsatt, A., & Lozada, H. R. (2018). Business analytics in the marketing curriculum: A call for integration. Marketing Education Review, 28(1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/10528008.2018.1436974
   Google Scholar
• Muncy, J. A. (2014). Blogging for reflection: The use of online journals to engage students in reflective learning. Marketing Education Review, 24(2), 101–114. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008240202
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H., & Polidan, M. (2017). Retail consulting class: Experiential learning platform to develop future retail talents. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(1), 31–46. doi:10.1177/0273475317743015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzouk, N. Y., Seitz, V., & Rizkallah, E. (2003). Learning by doing: Using experiential projects in the undergraduate marketing strategy course. Marketing Education Review, 13(2), 35–41. doi:10.1080/10528008.2003.11488827
   Google Scholar
• Schlee, R. P., & Karns, G. L. (2017). Job requirements for marketing graduates: Are there differences in the knowledge, skills, and personal attributes needed for different salary levels?. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(2), 69–81. doi:10.1177/0273475317712765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, B. L., & Tseng, L. D. (2002). Do academics and practitioners agree on what and how to teach the undergraduate marketing research course? Journal of Marketing Education, 24(3), 225–232. doi:10.1177/0273475302238045
   Google Scholar
• Veeck, A., & Hoger, B. (2014). Tools for monitoring social media: A marketing research project. Marketing Education Review, 24(1), 37–72. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008240106
   Google Scholar
• Yazici, H. J. (2004). Student perceptions of collaborative learning in operations management classes. Journal of Education for Business, 80(2), 110–118. doi:10.3200/JOEB.80.2.110-118
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. R. (2002). Experiential learning = hands-on + minds-on. Marketing Education Review, 12(1), 43–51.
   Google Scholar