Case study–based learning in customer-centric operations management: Unleashing the potential of experiential learning and accreditation

References

• Aqlan, F., Al-Araidah, O., & Al-Hawari, T. (2010). Quality assurance and accreditation of engineering education in Jordan. European Journal of Engineering, 35, 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Arlett, C., Lamb, F., Dales, R., Willis, L., & Hurdle, E. (2010). Meeting the needs of industry: The drivers for change in engineering education. Engineering Education, 5(2), 18–25. doi:10.11120/ened.2010.05020018
   Google Scholar
• Bassetto, S., Fiegenwald, V., Cholez, C., & Mangione, F. (2011). Experiencing production ramp-up education for engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 313–326. doi:10.1080/03043797.2011.585521
   Google Scholar
• Chuchalin, A., & Kriushova, A. (2011). Engineering curriculum design based on accreditation criteria. In Quadrado, J.C., & J., Bernardino (Eds.), SEFI annual conference (pp. 641–644). Lisbon, Portugal: European Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, R. M., Johnson, C. B., & Schwartz, W. C. (2013). Enhancing student experiential learning with structured interviews. Journal of Education for Business, 88(3), 136–146. doi:10.1080/08832323.2012.659296
   Google Scholar
• De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change - implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• ENAEE – European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education: EUR-ACE. (2005, April 2018). Retrieved from http://www.enaee.eu/wp-assets-enaee/uploads/2015/04/EUR-ACE-Framework-Standards-and-Guidelines-Mar-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S., & Pyke, J. (2008). Content relevance in case-study teaching: The alumni connection and its effect on student motivation. Journal of Education for Business, 83(5), 251–258. doi:10.3200/JOEB.83.5.251-258
   Google Scholar
• Hakeem, S. A. (2001). Effect of experiential learning in business statistics. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 95–98. doi:10.1080/08832320109599056
   Google Scholar
• Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(3), 229–314. doi:10.2307/1390807
   Google Scholar
• Jun, S., & Lee, S. (2010). Empirical comparison of clustering algorithms using Silhouette information. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, 10(1), 31–36. doi:10.5391/IJFIS.2010.10.1.031
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen-Yrjänheikki, K., Tukiainen, T., & Takala, M. (2007). New challenging approaches to engineering education: Enhancing university-industry co-operation. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 167–179. doi:10.1080/03043790601118697
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekatompessy, F. M. (2010). Needs analysis in curriculum development: Report on the third chapter of Jack Richard’s book (curriculum development in language teaching). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P. R., & McCarthy, H. M. (2006). When case studies are not enough: Integrating experiential learning into business curricula. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 201–204. doi:10.3200/JOEB.81.4.201-204
   Google Scholar
• McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Ingleson, L. R. (2018). The nature and practice of professional judgement in program evaluation. In J. C., McDavid, I. Huse, & L. R. Hawthorn (Eds.), Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (3rd ed., pp. 499–501). California: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Medini, K. (2015). Customer order fulfilment in mass customization context: An agent based approach. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 10(4), 334–349. doi:10.1504/IJSPM.2015.072525
   Google Scholar
• Medini, K. (2018). Teaching customer-centric operations management – evidence from an experiential learning-oriented mass customisation class. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 65–78. doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1310185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medini, K., Da Cunha, C., & Bernard, A. (2012). Sustainable mass customized enterprise: Key concepts, enablers and assessment techniques. IFAC Proceedings, 45(6), 522–527. doi:10.3182/20120523-3-RO-2023.00242
   Google Scholar
• Owens, C. L., & Fortenberry, N. L. (2007). A transformation model of engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 429–440. doi:10.1080/03043790701333006
   Google Scholar
• Patil, A., & Codner, G. (2007). Accreditation of engineering education: Review, observations and proposal for global accreditation. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 639–651. doi:10.1080/03043790701520594
   Google Scholar
• Peillon, S., Medini, K., & Dubruc, N. (2016). An initial training program on Product-Service Systems and servitization for engineering students. Procedia Cirp, 47, 282–287. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.074
   Google Scholar
• Salvador, F., Holan, P. M., & Piller, F. (2009). Cracking the code of mass customization. MIT Sloan Management, 50(3), 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., & King, M. C. (2007). Interdisciplinarity and systems thinking: Some implications for engineering education and education for industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 13, 37–41. doi:10.1080/03043798808939422
   Google Scholar
• Visich, J. K., Gu, Q., & Khumawala, B. M. (2012). B2C mass customization in the classroom. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 10(4), 521–545. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2012.00352.x
   Google Scholar