Using Kahoot! to increase exam scores and engagement

References

• Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chih-Yuan Sun, J., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2008). eLearning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2020). The reflective educators guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. M., & Driscoll. M. P. (1989). Essentials of learning for instruction. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gebre, E., Saroyan, A., & Bracewell, R. (2014). Students’ engagement in technology rich classrooms and its relationship to professors’ conceptions of effective teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 83–96. doi:10.1111/bjet.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Newton, K., Rudkowski, J., Lee, S. H. (Mark), Hogue, J., & Ratnichkina, P. (2019). Mobile devices in the lecture hall: Into it, indifferent, or intrusion? Journal of Education for Business, 94(6), 390–399. doi:10.1080/08832323.2018.1541853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 362–382. doi:10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D., & Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls (Vol. II, pp. 693–719). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: In search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35(3), 207–256. doi:10.1007/s11251-006-9005-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchens, B., Means, T., & Tan, Y. (2018). Captivate: Building blocks for implementing active learning. Journal of Education for Business, 93(2), 58–73. doi:10.1080/08832323.2017.1417232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. doi:10.1177/002205741319300303
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning. (cover story). Change, 33(3), 10. doi:10.1080/00091380109601795
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, M. E., & Culver, S. (2010). The National Survey of Student Engagement: A university-level analysis. Tertiary Education & Management, 16(1), 35–44. doi:10.1080/13583881003629814
   Google Scholar
• Mader, S., & Bry, F. (2019). Fun and engagement in lecture halls through social gamification. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(2), 113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGovern, E. F., Luna-Nevarez, C., & Baruca, A. (2017). Utilizing mobile devices to enrich the learning style of students. Journal of Education for Business, 92(2), 89–95. doi:10.1080/08832323.2017.1281213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro, P. D., & Terry, M. (2007). A matter of style: Applying Kolb's learning style model to college mathematics teaching practices. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 38(1), 53–60. doi:10.1080/10790195.2007.10850204
   Google Scholar
• Plump, C. M., & Larosa, J. (2017). Using Kahoot! in the classroom to create engagement and active learning: A game-based technology solution for elearning novices. Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151–158. doi:10.1177/2379298116689783
   Google Scholar
• Qaisar, N., Shahzad, K., & Arif, M. (2018). Extent of Hris adoption and its impact on organization’s performance: Moderating role of HR staff expertise. Abasyn University Journal of Social Sciences, July(7), 1–11. Retrieved from http://proxy.ulib.csuohio.edu:2066/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=131549385&site=ehost-live.
   Google Scholar
• Swart, R. (2017). Critical thinking instruction and technology enhanced learning from the student perspective: A mixed methods research study. Nurse Education in Practice, 23, 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2017.02.00
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, W., & Xiao, Q. (2018). Facilitate active learning: The role of perceived benefits of using technology. Journal of Education for Business, 93(3), 88–96. doi:10.1080/08832323.2018.1425281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar