Investigating academic dishonesty among business school students using fraud triangle theory and role of technology

References

• Ahmed, K. (2018). Student perceptions of academic dishonesty in a private middle eastern university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 8(1), 16–29. Retrieved April 10, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1180068.pdf. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v8i1.400
   Google Scholar
• Akbulut, Y., Şendağ, S., Birinci, G., Kılıçer, K., Şahin, M. C., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2008). Exploring the types and reasons of Internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: Development of internet-triggered academic dishonesty scale (ITADS). Computers & Education, 51(1), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amigud, A., & Lancaster, T. (2019). 246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students’ reasons for seeking to outsource academic work. Computers & Education, 134, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders, B. A. (2023). Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? Patterns, 4(3), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, J. (2006). Using the business fraud triangle to predict academic dishonesty among business students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 10, 37–54. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/using-business-fraud-triangle-predict-academic/docview/214232023/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Birhane, A., Raji, I. D. (2022). “ChatGPT, galactica, and the progress trap”.| WIRED. https://www.wired.com/story/large-language-models-critique/ (accessed 30.06.23).
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D. M., Dezoort, F. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2015). The effect of alternative fraud model use on auditors’ fraud risk judgments. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(6), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, A. (2023). Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? Patterns, 4(3), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Brodowsky, G. H., Tarr, E., Ho, F. N., & Sciglimpaglia, D. (2020). Tolerance for cheating from the classroom to the boardroom: A study of underlying personal and cultural drivers. Journal of Marketing Education, 42(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475319878810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture: Why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead. Harcourt, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chui, C., Kouchaki, M., & Gino, F. (2021). “Many others are doing it, so why shouldn’t I?”: How being in larger competitions leads to more cheating. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 164, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2016). Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1161602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, G. J., & Popal, R. (2011). An examination of factors related to plagiarism and a five-year follow-up of plagiarism at an Australian university. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.v7i1.742
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/259223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellaportas, S. (2013). Conversations with inmate accountants: Motivation, opportunity and the fraud triangle. Accounting Forum, 37(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Donald, A. (2018). “Is the ‘time of the assessed essay’ over? Teach. Perspect”. Bus. Sch. https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/business-school-teaching/2018/11/14/is-the-time-of-the-assessed-essay-over/(accessed 05.07.23).
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, S. E. (2017). Comparative analysis of institutional policy definitions of plagiarism: A pan-Canadian University study. Interchange, 48(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-017-9300-7
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, L. (2022). “AI ethics and the future of where large language models are heading”. Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2022/08/30/ai-ethics-asking-aloud-whether-large-language-models-and-their-bossy-believers-are-taking-ai-down-a-dead-end-path/ (accessed 01.07.22).
   Google Scholar
• Eret, E., & Ahmet, O. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.880776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. L., Flostrand, A., Lam, J., & Pitt, L. (2022). Caught in a vicious cycle? Student perceptions of academic dishonesty in the business classroom. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100677. (Forthcoming in November 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, J., & Kohlbeck, M. (2020). Addressing cheating when using test bank questions in online Classes. Journal of Accounting Education, 52(C).
   Google Scholar
• Grieve, R., & Elliott, J. (2013). Cyberfaking: I can, so I will? Intentions to fake in online psychological testing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(5), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, A. M., & Johnson, L. R. (2017). How employers perceive online accounting education: Evidence from Kentucky. Journal of Accounting Education, 40, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. R. (1989). Ethical values and decision processes of male and female business students. Journal of Education for Business, 64(5), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1989.10117365
   Google Scholar
• Hendy, N. T., & Montargot, N. (2019). Understanding academic dishonesty among business school students in France using the theory of planned behavior. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heriyati, D., & Ekasari, W. F. (2020). A study on academic dishonesty and moral reasoning. International Journal of Education, 12(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v12i2.18653
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek, K. (2018). Will and Caroline: Accounting, professional integrity and lobbying. Journal of Accounting Education, 43, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569911404059
   Google Scholar
• Jurdi, R., Hage, H. S., & Chow, H. P. H. (2011). Academic dishonesty in the Canadian classroom: behaviours of a sample of university students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v41i3.2488
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C. C. S., Hue, M. T., & Cheung, H. Y. (2018). Academic dishonesty among Hong Kong secondary school students: Application of theory of planned behaviour. Educational Psychology, 38(7), 945–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1454588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lartey, J. (2019). “Felicity Huffman among dozens charged over admissions fraud at top US schools”., the Guardian March 13 (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/12/us-college-admissions-fraud-scheme-charges-georgetown-southern-california-universities)
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S. (2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans?” URL https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/05/what-is-ai-chatbot-phenomenon-chatgpt-and-could-it-replace-humans (accessed on 02.07.2023).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., Everett, B., Ramjan, L. M., Callins, R., Glew, P., & Salamonson, Y. (2017). Plagiarism in nursing education: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(19-20), 2845–2864. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1996). What we know about cheating in college. Longitudinal trends and recent development. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 28(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1996.10544253
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it. JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension of modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014893102151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLafferty, C. L., & Foust, K. M. (2004). Electronic plagiarism as a college instructor’s nightmare-prevention and detection. Journal of Education for Business, 79(3), 186–190. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.79.3.186-190
   Google Scholar
• Scharth, M. (2022). “The ChatGPT chatbot is blowing people away with its writing skills. An expert explains why it’s so impressive”. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-chatgpt-chatbot-is-blowing-people-away-with-its-writing-skills-an-expert-explains-why-its-so-impressive-195908 (accessed on 02.07.2023).
   Google Scholar
• Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays—Should professors worry? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
   Google Scholar
• Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarah, H., Curtis, H., MacAlister, D., & Graham, F. (2016). Student academic dishonesty: The potential for situational prevention. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1064982
   Google Scholar
• Tremayne, K., & Guy, J. C. (2021). Attitudes and understanding are only part of the story: self-control, age and self-imposed pressure predict plagiarism over and above perceptions of seriousness and understanding. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1764907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vencat, E., Overdorf, J., & Adams, J. (2006). The perfect score. Newsweek (Atlantic Edition), 147(13), 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wajda-Johnston, V. A., Handal, P. J., Brawer, P. A., & Fabricatore, A. N. (2001). Academic dishonesty at the graduate level. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902912994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltzer, T., & Dahl, A. (2023). Why do students cheat? Perceptions, evaluations and motivations. Ethics & Behavior, 33(2), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2022.2026775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., Kenton, Z., Brown, S., Hawkins, W., Stepleton, T., Biles, C., Birhane, A., Haas, J., Rimell, L., Hendricks, L. A., … Gabriel, I. (2021). “Ethical and social risks of harm from language models”. ArXiv211204359 Cs.
   Google Scholar
• Yekta, A. S., Lupton, R., Takei, H., Mabudi, K., & Jahanfar, M. (2013). A Comparative study of attitudes of academic staffs towards academic dishonesty between USA and Iranian higher educational institutions. International Research in Education, 2(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v2i1.4178
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Yin, H. (2020). Collaborative cheating among Chinese college students: The effects of peer influence and individualism-collectivism orientations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1608504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar