Encouraging student engagement, interaction, and learning via online discussion boards: Reflections on using Yellowdig in the COVID-19 era

References

• Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, H., & Olson, J. E. (2021). What learning tools do students prefer? An assessment of undergraduate business courses. Journal of Education for Business, 96(5), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1812490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, G. F., Heller, N. A., Burch, J. J., Freed, R., & Steed, S. A. (2015). Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cable, J. H. (2021). Can you increase student engagement? A beta test of Yellowdig. Project Management World Journal, 10(2), 1–8. See also Yellowdig pilot assessment report. https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/210204-YellowDig-Fall-Semester-Beta-Test-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., & Huang, T. (2019). It is about timing: Network prestige in asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, Q., Lutz, H. S., & Padgitt, A. J. (2017). Creating participatory online learning environments: A social learning approach revisited. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 28(1), 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ensmann, S., & Whiteside, A. (2022). ‘It helped to know I wasn’t alone’: Exploring student satisfaction in an online community with a gamified, social media-like instructional approach. Online Learning, 26(3), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i3.3340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. (2019). Digging Economics – ECON 200: Economics essentials and issues. UNL Faculty Course Portfolios 211. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/prtunl/211
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., & Smidt, S. (2007). Use of instructional dialogue by university students in a difficult distance education physics course. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gulinna, A., & Gutsch, S. (2018). Optimizing learner experience with intuitive asynchronous online discussion design. In Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. (2021). Successful learning communities during times of disruption: Developing a community of inquiry in business communication. Business Communication Research and Practice, 4(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.22682/bcrp.2021.4.1.57
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & Trespalacios, J. (2022). Classroom community and time: Comparing students’ perceptions of classroom community in traditional vs. accelerated online courses. Online Learning, 26(4), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. C., Martin, M. J., & Feldstein, A. P. (2017). Using Yellowdig in marketing courses: An analysis of individual contributions and social interactions in online classroom communities and their impact on student learning and engagement. Global Journal of Business Pedagogy, 1(1), 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00129-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S. (2022). Education 3.0: Connecting the learning experience. https://www.yellowdig.co/post/education-3-0-connecting-the-learning-experience
   Google Scholar
• Sautter, P. (2007). Designing discussion activities to achieve desired learning outcomes: Choices using mode of delivery and structure. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475307302014
   Google Scholar
• Savvides, P., Ye, S., Verdine, B., Kampa, S. (2019). Yellowdig usage and relations to Arizona State University online class grade and completion outcomes. https://www.yellowdig.co/post/improving-course-success-and-retention-with-yellowdig
   Google Scholar
• Serva, M., Convery, A., & Bullough, A. (2021). Motivational tiered assessment: A new grading approach for motivating information systems students. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 49(1), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04934
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. J. W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.03800.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M., Ni, A., Medina, P., Canelon, J., Kordrostami, M., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Integrating students’ perspectives about online learning: a hierarchy of factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00229-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K., Curren, M. T., Kiesler, T., Lammers, H. B., & Goldenson, J. (2013). Scholarly networking among business students: Structured discussion board activity and academic outcomes. Journal of Education for Business, 88(5), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.690352
   Google Scholar
• Wu, D., & Hiltz, S. R. (2019). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Online Learning, 8(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i2.1832
   Google Scholar