References
- Dougherty , D. S. and Kramer , M. 2005 . A rationale for scholarly examination of institutional review boards: A case study . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 33 ( 3 ) : 183 – 186 .
- Gunsalus , C. K. , Bruner , E. M. , Burbules , N. C. and Dash , L. 2007 . “ The Illinois White Paper—Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting IRB mission creep ” . In University of Illinois Law & Economics Research Paper No. LE06-016 et al. (.Available at SSRN: http://ssrncom/abstract=902995
- Iverson , C. , Christiansen , S. and Flanagan , A. 2007 . “ 5.8, Protecting research participants' and patients' rights in scientific publication. ” . In AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors, , 10th ed. New York, NY : Oxford University Press .
- Koerner , A. F. 2005 . Communication scholars' communication and relationship with their IRBs . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 33 ( 3 ) : 231 – 241 .
- The Nuremberg Code . 1947 . Doctors of infamy: The story of the Nazi medical crimes Edited by: Mitscherlich , A. and Mielke , F. xxiii – xxv . New York : Schuman .
- Scott , C. R. 2005 . Annonymity in applied communication research: Tensions between IRBs, researchers, and human subjects . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 33 ( 3 ) : 242 – 257 .
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services . 1979 . The Belmont Report. (Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/related.html#historicaldocument/
- World Medical Association . 1949 . International code of medical ethics updated 2006). http://wma.net/e/policy/c8/htm
- World Medical Association . 1964 . Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects updated 2008). http://www.wma.net/e/policy/pdf/17c.pdf