Knowledge as a Measure of News Reception in the Agenda-Setting Process

References

• Aday, S., Livingston, S., & Hebert, M. (2005). Embedding the truth: A cross-cultural analysis of objectivity and television of the Iraq war. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R. L., & Waks, L. (1986). The dimensionality of commonly employed mass media exposure measures. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. H. (2007). Toward a new generation of media use measures for the ANES. American national election studies pilot study report, No. nes011903. http://www.electionstudies.org/resources/papers/Pilot2006/nes011903.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, C. K. (1972). Anticipated communication and mass media information-seeking. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 188–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin, C. K., Galloway, J. J., & Nayman, O. B. (1976). News media exposure, political knowledge and campaign interest. Journalism Quarterly, 53, 231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25, 345–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. E. (1988). “Know-nothings” revisited: The meaning of political ignorance today. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 476–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. E., Rhine, S. L., & Flickinger, R. S. (2000). Reading's impact on democratic citizenship in America. Political Behavior, 22, 167–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, D., & Weaver, D. (2006). Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. N., & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 16–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Hutchens, M. J., & Shen, F. (2009). Exposure, attention, or “use” of news? assessing aspects of the reliability and validity of a central concept in political communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 3, 223–244.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, K., & Aday, S. (2003). The scary world in your living room and neighborhood: Using local broadcast news, neighborhood crime rates, and personal experience to test agenda setting and cultivation. Journal of Communication, 53, 411–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D. B. (1985). Viewer characteristics and agenda setting by television news. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 340–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1979). Television news and issue salience: A reexamination of the agenda-setting hypothesis. American Politics Quarterly, 7, 395–416.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2003). A boost or bust for democracy? How the Web influenced political attitudes and behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 9–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanihan, S. F., & Chaffee, S. H. (1996). Situational influence of political involvement on information seeking: A field experiment. Paper presented at the annual conference of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. L., & Wanta, W. (1990). Effects of personal, interpersonal and media experiences on issue saliences. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 804–813.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (vol. 1, pp. 137–230). New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2006). The need for orientation towards news media: Revising and validating a classic concept. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 422–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, R., & Patterson, T. (1976). Print vs. network news. Journal of Communication, 26, 23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted Source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, J. (2003). Country characteristics as contingent conditions of agenda setting: The moderating influence of polarized elite opinion. Communication Research, 30, 683–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 133–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1986). The main source: Learning from television news. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2010). A new look at agenda-setting effects: Comparing the predictive power of overall political news consumption and specific news media consumption across different media channels and media types. Journal of Communication, 60, 271–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y. (2003). Does audience skepticism of the media matter in agenda setting? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 157–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanta, W. (1997). The public and the national agenda: How people learn about important issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, D. H. (1977). Political issues and voter need for orientation. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American political issues (pp. 107–119). St. Paul, MN: West.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, D. H. (1980). Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research, 7, 361–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, J. P., & Eyal, C. H. (1981). Agenda setting for the civil right issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 376–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure [Monograph]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. (1996). The myth of massive media impact revived: New support for a discredited idea. In D. C. Mutz, P. M. Sniderman & R. A. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 17–78). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J.-H., Watt, J. H., Snyder, L. B., Yan, J., & Jiang, Y. (1993). Public issue priority formation: Media agenda-setting and social interaction. Journal of Communication, 43, 8–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of news media influence. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook (vol. 2, pp. 225–240). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar