Social Media for Social Change: Social Media Political Efficacy and Activism in Student Activist Groups

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005) The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38, 451–470. doi:10.1177/0093650210381738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York. NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology & Health, 13, 623–649. doi:10.1080/08870449808407422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 31, 143–164. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006) Guide for construction self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CN: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsting, S., & Postmes, T. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age. Small Group Research, 33, 525–554. doi:10.1177/104649602237169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009). Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 945–954). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518847
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 Presidential election. Political Research Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1065912913482758
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12, 289–314. doi:10.1007/BF00992337
   Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, J., & Kreft, I. (1986). Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 57. doi:10.2307/1164848
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed., 2007 update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Social media update 2013. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., McKee Hurwitz, H., Mejia Mesinas, A., Tolan, M., & Arlotti, A. (2013). This protest will be tweeted. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 459–478. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., & Östman, J. (2013). Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of Internet use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650213476295
   Google Scholar
• Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Wollebæk, D. (2013). Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides? New Media & Society, 15, 890–908, doi:10.1177/1461444812462844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2005). Intraclass correlation. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa313
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 891–913. doi:10.2307/2111186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: Evidence from a West German panel. The Journal of Politics, 49, 441–464. doi:10.2307/2131308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J., Huge, M. E., & Hoffman, L. H. (2012). All the news that's fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 113–119. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, S. (2012). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 14, 225–243. doi:10.1177/1461444811410408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. (2009). New media, new politics: Political learning efficacy and the examination of uses of social network sites for political engagement (Doctoral dissertation). Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. C., & Bean, C. S. (1993). Political efficacy: A comparative study of the United States, West Germany, Great Britain and Australia. European Journal of Political Research, 23, 261–280. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1993.tb00359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., Vissers, S., Stolle, D., & Mahéo, V. (2010). The potential of Internet mobilization: An experimental study on the effect of Internet and face-to-face mobilization efforts. Political Communication, 27, 406–431. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.516799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, J. A., & Banducci, S. A. (2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 311–334. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1995). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A study of women's participation in collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1430–1445. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173–192. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Unraveling the effects of active and passive forms of political Internet use: Does it affect citizens' political involvement? New Media & Society, doi:10.1177/1461444813495163
   Google Scholar
• Kullback, S. (1997). Information theory and statistics. North Chemsford, MA: Courier Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., & Johnston, E. (2005). Follow the (slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work (pp. 11–20). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1099203.1099206
   Google Scholar
• LaRose, R., Gregg, J. L., Strover, S., Straubhaar, J., & Carpenter, S. (2007). Closing the rural broadband gap: Promoting adoption of the Internet in rural America. Telecommunications Policy, 31, 359–373. doi:16/j.telpol.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2006). Effects of Internet use on college students' political efficacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 415–422. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.415
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin, J.-H., Peng, W., Kim, M., Kim, S. Y., & LaRose, R. (2012). Social networking and adjustments among international students. New Media & Society, 14, 421–440. doi:10.1177/1461444811418627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macafee, T. (2013). Some of these things are not like the others: Examining motivations and political predispositions among political Facebook activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2766–2775. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Neuberger, L. (2013). Predicting land use voting behavior: Expanding our understanding of the influence of attitudes and social norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2377–2390. doi:10.1111/jasp.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, E. M., Snelson, C., & Elison-Bowers, P. (2010). Image and video disclosure of substance use on social media Web sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1405–1411. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, M. E. (2005). Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy. Political Behavior, 27, 49–69. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nah, S., Veenstra, A. S., & Shah, D. V. (2006). The Internet and anti-war activism: A case study of information, expression, and action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 230–247. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00323.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattie, C., & Johnston, R. (1998). Voter turnout at the British General Election of 1992: Rational choice, social standing or political efficacy? European Journal of Political Research, 33, 263–283. doi:10.1023/A:1006854900327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of Internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 411–427. doi:10.1177/0894439307312631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, G. L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H. E., & Verba, S. (2012). Social media and political engagement: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/10/19/social-media-and-political-engagement/
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, T. J., Gangl, A., & Stevens, D. (2000). The effects of efficacy and emotions on campaign involvement. Journal of Politics, 62, 1189–1197. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention—behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1–36. doi:10.1080/14792772143000003
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2013). Civic engagement in the digital age. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Civic-Engagement/Summary-of-Findings.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivaraite statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62, 299–314. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A. (2014) Construcción de escalas de medición de activismo individual y colectivo en línea. In J. C. Valencia & C. P. García (Eds.), Movimientos sociales e Internet (pp. 237–258). Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
   Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Youth collective activism through social media: The role of collective efficacy. New Media & Society, 17(6), 899–918. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813518391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., Wash, R., Lampe, C., & Bjornrud, T. (2014). Latent users in an online user-generated content community. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 23, 21–50. doi:10.1007/s10606-013-9188-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers, S., Hooghe, M., Stolle, D., & Mahéo, V.-A. (2012). The impact of mobilization media on off-line and online participation: Are mobilization effects medium-specific? Social Science Computer Review, 30, 152–169. doi:10.1177/0894439310396485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107–114. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossler, C. A., Kerkvliet, J., Polasky, S., & Gainutdinova, O. (2003). Externally validating contingent valuation: An open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 261–277. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00097-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. I. (2007). Political use of the Internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17, 381–395.
   Google Scholar
• Wollman, N., & Stouder, R. (1991). Believed efficacy and political activity: A test of the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 557–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar