Civil Interactivity: How News Organizations' Commenting Policies Explain Civility and Hostility in User Comments

References

• Alonzo, M., & Aiken, M. (2004). Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems, 36, 205–213. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00190-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. (2011). Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local U.S. newsrooms. Journalism, 12, 550–566. doi:10.1177/1464884911402451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, T. W. (1996). Rhetoric, civility, and community: Political debate on computer bulletin boards. Communication Quarterly, 44, 359–378. doi:10.1080/01463379609370023.
   Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, P. J., & Mitchelstein, E. (2011). Clicking, e-mailing, and commenting: How users take advantage of different forms of interactivity on online news sites. Human Communication Research, 38, 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01418.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, J. A. (2015). News programs: Designing MSNBC.com's online interfaces. Journalism, 16, 27–43. doi:10.1177/1464884914545730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, J. A., & Gillespie, T. (2011). Hosting the public discourse, hosting the public: When online news and social media converge. Journalism Practice, 5, 383–398. doi:10.1080/17512786.2011.557560
   Google Scholar
• Chung, D. S. (2008). Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 658–679. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00414.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, D. S., & Yoo, C. Y. (2008). Audience motivations for using interactive features: Distinguishing use of different types of interactivity on an online newspaper. Mass Communication & Society, 11, 375–397. doi:10.1080/15205430701791048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64, 658–679. doi:10.1111/jcom.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, B. (2013, 2 August). Comments on the web: Engaging readers or swamping journalism? The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/08/comments-on-the-web-engaging-readers-or-swamping-journalism/278311/
   Google Scholar
• Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2005). How oversight improves member-maintained communities. Proceedings of CHI, 2005, 11–20. doi:10.1145/1054972.1054975
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., & Gillespie, T. (2014). What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media & Society. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444814543163
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7, article 5. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/dahlberg.html.
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N., & Naaman, M. (2011). Towards quality discourse in online news comments. CSCW 2011. Hangzhou, China. March 19–23. doi:10.1145/1958824.1958844
   Google Scholar
• Díaz Noci, J., Domingo, D., Masip, P., Lluís Micó, J., & Ruiz, C. (2010). Comments in news, democracy booster or journalistic nightmare: Assessing the quality and dynamics of citizen debates in Catalan online newspapers. International Symposium on Online Journalism. Austin, TX. April 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31, 289–324. doi:10.1023/A:1016284431021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 215–242. doi:10.1515/JPLR.2010.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I. (2011). Civil society and online political discourse: The network structure of unrestricted discussion. Communication Research, 38, 634–659. doi:10.1177/0093650210384853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüning, M. (2007). TextSTAT (Simple Text Analysis Tool) 2.7. Retrieved from http://www.niederlandistik.fu-berlin.de/textstat/software-en.html
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. C. (2005). Civility in online discussion: The case of foreign policy dialogue. Canadian Journal of Communication, 30, 633–648. Retrieved from http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/1585
   Google Scholar
• Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Lessard, K. (2014). User engagement with online news: Conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments. New Media & Society. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444814545073
   Google Scholar
• Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Zivic, A. (2014). Discussing the news: Civility and hostility in user comments. Digital Journalism. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.972079
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2011). Interactive to me—interactive to you? A study of use and appreciation of interactivity on Swedish newspaper websites. New Media & Society, 13, 1180–1197. doi:10.1177/1461444811401254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. (2005). Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 385–403. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00017.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. (2011, April). Crowdsourcing the news [Video file]. TED. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/paul_lewis_crowdsourcing_the_news
   Google Scholar
• Massey, B. L., & Levy, M. R. (1999). Interactivity, online journalism, and English-language web newspapers in Asia. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 138–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, K. (2015). Journalistic concern about uncivil political talk in digital news media: Responsibility, credibility, and academic influence. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20, 85–107. doi:10.1177/1940161214558748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moor, P. J., Heuvelman, A., & Verleur, R. (2010). Flaming on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1536–1546. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagar, N. (2011). The loud public: The case of user comments in online news media. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest. (No. 2407413151). Retrieved from http://udini.proquest.com/view/the-loud-public-the-case-of-user-pqid:2407413151/.
   Google Scholar
• Neurauter-Kessels, M. (2011). Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites. Journal of Politeness Research, 7, 187–214. doi:10.1515/JPLR.2011.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. W. J., & Detenber, B. H. (2005). The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10, article 4. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/ng.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, P. B., & Flanagin, A. J. (2003). Reconceptualizing “flaming” and other problematic messages. New Media and Society, 5, 69–94. doi:10.1177/1461444803005001908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4, 9–27. doi:10.1177/14614440222226244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. doi:10.1177/1461444804041444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC2007. LIWC, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.liwc.net
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Retrieved from http://www.liwc.net/LIWC2007LanguageManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2011). Navigating news online: Where people go, how they get there and what lures them away. Pew Research Center. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/top_25
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2012). The state of the news media 2012: An annual report on American journalism. Pew Research Center. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/digital-news-gains-audience-but-loses-more-ground-in-chase-for-revenue/digital-by-the-numbers/
   Google Scholar
• Reader, B. (2012). Free press vs. free speech? The rhetoric of “civility” in regard to anonymous online comments. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 495–513. doi:10.1177/1077699012447923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. E., & Stanyer, J. (2011). Reader opinion in the digital age: Tabloid and broadsheet newspaper websites and the exercise of political voice. Journalism, 12, 983–1003. doi:10.1177/1464884911415974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Lluís Micó, J., Díaz-Noci, J., Meso, K., & Masip, P. (2011). Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 463–487. doi:10.1177/1940161211415849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8, 18–33. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz Weiss, A., & de Macedo Higgins Joyce, V. (2009). Compressed dimensions in digital media occupations: Journalists in transformation. Journalism, 10, 587–603. doi:10.1177/1464884909106534.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, T. (1999). Interactive options in online journalism: A content analysis of 100 US newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5, article 2. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/schultz.html.
   Google Scholar
• Soni, J. (2013, 26 August). The reason HuffPost is ending anonymous accounts. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jimmy-soni/why-is-huffpost-ending-an_b_3817979.html
   Google Scholar
• Taneja, H., Webster, J. G., Malthouse, E. C., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). Media consumption across platforms: Identifying user-defined repertoires. New Media & Society, 14, 951–968. doi:10.1177/1461444811436146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnage, A. K. (2007). Email flaming behaviors and organizational conflict. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 43–59. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00385.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, P. (2014). Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers' reader comments. New Media & Society, 16(6), 941–957. doi:10.1177/1461444813495165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, C. Y. (2011). Modeling audience interactivity as the gratification-seeking process in online newspapers. Communication Theory, 21, 67–89. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01376.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Yuen-Ying, C., & Zhen-Mei, P. (2008). Deliberativeness of online political discussion: A content analysis of the Guangzhou Daily website. Journalism Studies, 9, 759–770. doi:10.1080/14616700802207771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar