Facebook Friend Request: Applying the Theory of Reasoned Action to Student-Teacher Relationships on Facebook

References

• ACPA Ethics Code. (2006). Statement of ethical principles and standards. Retrieved from http://www.myacpa.org/au/documents/EthicsStatement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. doi:10.1348/014466601164939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R., & White, K. (2010). Predicting adolescents’ use of social networking sites: From an extended theory of planned behavior perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1591–1597. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. Article 11. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/Boyd.ellison.html
   Google Scholar
• Cain, J., & Fink, J. L. (2010). Legal and ethical issues regarding social media and pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74, 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, J., Scott, D. R., & Akers, P. (2009). Pharmacy students’ Facebook activity and opinions regarding accountability and e-professionalism. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73, 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, R. (2010). Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior applied to the use of social networking by college students. Honors Thesis. Texas State University–San Marcos.
   Google Scholar
• Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329, 1194–1197. doi:10.1126/science.1185231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, N. (2012). Social networking is the new peer pressure. The Times of India. Retrieved from http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-11-19/man-woman/33738135_1_facebook-comments-peer-pressure-fb
   Google Scholar
• DiVerniero, R. A., & Hosek, A. M. (2011). Students’ perceptions and communicative management of instructors’ online self-disclosure. Communication Quarterly, 59, 428–449. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.597275
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. L., Householder, B. J., & Greene, K. L. (2002). The theory of reasoned action. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 259–286). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heaven, P. C. L. (1994). Contemporary adolescence: A social psychological approach. Melbourne, Australia: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on Facebook. Poster presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
   Google Scholar
• Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 109–125. doi:10.1057/jit.2010.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2002). The effects of peers on the academic and creative talent development of a gifted adolescent male. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, L. A., & Peters, C. (2012). Defining appropriate professional behavior for faculty and university students on online social networking websites. Higher Education, 63, 135–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, E. J. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, B26–B27.
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., & Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook.” The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56, 1–17. doi:10.1080/03634520601009710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, B. (2012). Managing boundaries in the Web 2.0 classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2012, 15–28. doi:10.1002/tl.20024
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, A. H., Finley, K. N., Ulbrich, T. R., & McAuley, J. W. (2010). Pharmacy faculty members’ perspectives on the student/faculty relationship in online social networks. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74, 1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muuss, R. E. (1988). Theories of adolescence. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T. (1985). Students’ affective development within the college environment. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 640–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, P. E., & Nysveen, H. (2002). Using the theory of planned behavior to explain teenagers’ adoption of text messaging services. Working Paper. Agder University College.
   Google Scholar
• Pelling, E. L., & White, K. M. (2009). The theory of planned behavior applied to young people’s use of social networking Web sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 755–759. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peslak, A., Ceccucci, W., & Sendall, P. (2011). An empirical study of social networking behavior using theory of reasoned action. Conference for Information Systems Applied Research (CONISAR) Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Puzio, E. (2013). Why can’t we be friends? How far can the state go in restricting social networking communications between secondary school teachers and their students? Cardozo Law Review, 34, 1099–1127.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytical approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529. doi:10.3102/0034654311421793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. L. (2009). Facebook: The new classroom commons? Chronicle of Higher Education, 56, B12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness to communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20, 67–75. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.6
   Google Scholar
• Sturgeon, C. M., & Walker, C. (2009). Faculty on Facebook: Confirm or deny. Paper presented at the Annual Instructional Technology Conference, Murfreesboro, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Teacher e-mail message strategies and students’ willingness to communicate online. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 54–70. doi:10.1080/00909880128099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Trevino, L. K. (1995). Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1544–1572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (4th ed). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar