Social Media Type Matters: Investigating the Relationship Between Motivation and Online Social Network Heterogeneity

References

• Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Proceedings of the third International Workshop on Link Discovery (pp. 36–43). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ancu, M., & Cozma, R. (2009). MySpace politics: Uses and gratifications of befriending candidates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 567–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. L., & Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57, 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A. (2009). Friends versus followers: Twitter’s elegant design for grouping contacts. Retrieved from http://andrewchen.co/2009/03/16/friends-versus-followers-twitters-elegant-design-for-grouping-contacts
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M. (2015). Why do women bloggers use social media? Recreation and information motivations outweigh engagement motivations. New Media & Society, 17, 24–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. In L. A. Adamic, R. A. Baeza-Yates, & S. Counts (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 89–96). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., Pootheri, S. K., & Natarajan, V. L. (1998). Lessons from the early adopters of Web groupware. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Donath, J., & boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22, 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Low.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centered politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information Communication & Society, 16, 757–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Lee, C., & Her, E. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society, 13, 1031–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J. (2010). Core networks, social isolation, and new media. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 130–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2011). Does the early bird move the polls? The use of the social media tool “Twitter” by U.S. politicians and its impact on public opinion. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp.182–186). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., & Parks, M. R. (2012). Social media and political change: Capacity, constraint, and consequence. Journal of Communication, 62, 359–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14. doi:10.5210/fm.v14i1.2317.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 81, 1197–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, Y-C., Chu, T-H., & Tseng, C-H. (2013). Gratifications for using CMC technologies: A comparison among SNS, IM, and e-mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 226–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19^th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591–600). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face (book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 167–170). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64, 702–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking Web sites and teens: An overview. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2007/01/07/social-networking-websites-and-teens/
   Google Scholar
• Lofland, L. (1998). The public realm. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Z., Osborne, M., Tang, J., & Wang, T. (2013). Who will retweet me? Finding retweeters in Twitter. Proceedings of the 36^th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informational retrieval (pp. 869–872). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J., & Sokhey, A. (2014). Emotion, motivation, and social information seeking about politics. Political Communication, 31, 237–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95, 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., & Mendelson, A. (2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In S. Papathanassopoulos (Ed.), Media perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 212–230). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1641–1648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattie, C. J., & Johnston, R. J. (2008). It’s good to talk: Talk, disagreement and tolerance. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 677–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, J. (2009). Relationship symmetry in social networks: Why Facebook will go fully asymmetric. Retrieved from http://bokardo.com/archives/relationship-symmetry-in-social-networks-why-facebook-will-go-fully-asymmetric
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 717–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19, 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012). Social media and political engagement. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Political-Engagement.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1986). Interpersonal communication and news comprehension. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 160–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M. (2009). The uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research 3rd ed. (pp. 165–184). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruths, D., & Pfeffer, J. (2014). Social media for large studies of behavior. Science, 346, 1063–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in Web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56, 728–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322–2329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2015). Leading social networks worldwide as of December 2014, ranked by number of active users (in millions). Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., & Lee, J. K. (2013). Perceptions of cable news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 16, 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, L. P. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1510–1517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 399–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Tchernev, J. M., & Solloway, T. (2012). A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1289–1839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Pentina, I. (2012). Motivations and usage patterns of Weibo. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 312–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar