747
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Second Screening

Dual Screening: Examining Social Predictors and Impact on Online and Offline Political Participation Among Taiwanese Internet Users

References

  • Calenda, D., & Meijer, A. (2009). Young people, the Internet and political participation. Findings of a web survey in Italy, Spain and the Netherlands. Information, Communication and Society, 12, 879–898.
  • Cameron, J., & Geidner, N. (2014). Something old, something new, something borrowed from something blue: Experiments on dual viewing TV and Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 400–419.
  • Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60, 536–555.
  • Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counterpower in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–366.
  • Chadwick, A., & Howard, P. N. (2008). The handbook of Internet politics. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Christensen, H. S. (2012). Simply slacktivism? Internet participation in Finland. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 4, 1–23.
  • Chung, N., Han, H., & Koo, C. (2015). Adoption of travel information in user-generated content on social media: The moderating effect of social presence. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34, 902–919.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
  • Forsyth, B. H., Kudela, M. S., Levin, K., Lawrence, D., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Methods for translating an English-language survey questionnaire on tobacco use into Mandarin, Cantonese, Korean, and Vietnamese. Field Methods, 19, 264–283.
  • Gao, Q., Dai, Y., Fan, Z., & Kang, R. (2010). Understanding factors affecting perceived sociability of social software. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1846–1861.
  • Giglietto, F., & Silva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64, 260–277.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Bachmann, I., Hsu, S. H., & Brundidge, J. (2013). Expressive vs. consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538–1559.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. C. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65, 793–815.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64, 612–634.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A.E., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7, 36–51.
  • Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence, 1, 262–271.
  • Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveler? European Journal of Communication, 28, 19–34.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.
  • Hwang, Y., & Lim, J. S. (2015). The impact of engagement motives for social TV on social presence and sports channel commitment. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 755–765.
  • Ikeda, K., & Boase, J. (2011). Multiple discussion networks and their consequence for political participation. Communication Research, 38, 660–683.
  • Jackob, N. E. (2010). No alternatives? The relationship between perceived media dependency, use of alternative information sources, and general trust in mass media. International Journal of Communication, 4, 589–606.
  • Jago, R., Sebire, S. J., Gorely, T., Cillero, I. H., & Biddle, S. J. (2011). “I’m on it 24/7 at the moment”: A qualitative examination of multi-screen viewing behaviours among UK 10–11 year olds. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 8, 85.
  • Johns, M. D. (2012). Two screen viewing and social relationships: Exploring the invisible backchannel of TV viewing. In F. Sudweeks (Ed.), Proceedings cultural attitudes towards technology and communication (pp. 333–343). Perth, AU: Murdoch University.
  • Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising in believing? Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325–340.
  • Jung, N., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúniga, H. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 407–430.
  • Kaufhold, K., Valenzuela, S., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 515–529.
  • Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., & Jefferis, H. (2014). Social presence in online learning communities: The role of personal profiles. Research in Learning Technology, 22. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/40771/1/19710-131591-1-PB.pdf
  • Keenan, A., & Shiri, A. (2009). Sociability and social interaction on social networking Websites. Library Review, 58, 438–450.
  • Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173–192.
  • Kim, H. S., & Sundar, S. S. (2014). Can online buddies and bandwagon cues enhance user participation in online health communities? Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 319–333.
  • Kim, S. H. (2007). Media use, social capital, and civic participation in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 477–494.
  • Kim, T., & Biocca, F. (1997). Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, 0.
  • Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 381–403.
  • Kuha, J. (2004). AIC and BIC comparisons of assumptions and performance. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 188–229.
  • Lake, R. L. D., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19, 567–583.
  • Lee, M. C. (2015). Occupy on air: Transparency and surveillance in Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement. Anthropology Now, 7, 32–41.
  • Lee, S., & Schreer, B. (2016). Australian Strategic Policy Institute: Time to start worrying again? Cross-strait stability after the 2016 Taiwanese elections. Retrieved from https://www.aspi.org.au/publications/time-to-start-worrying-again/SI104_Taiwan.pdf
  • Leighley, J. E. (1990). Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation. American Politics Quarterly,18, 459–475.
  • Liebes, T. (2001). Inside a news time: A dispute over framing. Political Communication, 17, 295–305.
  • Lim, J. S., Hwang, Y., Kim, S., & Biocca, F. A. (2015). How social media engagement leads to sports channel loyalty: Mediating roles of social presence and channel commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 158–167.
  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lin, T. C., Chiang, Y., Liew, K. K., Theng, Y. L., Bautista, J. R., & Teo, W. (2016, May). How sociability and social presence influence viewers’ bridging social capital and program loyalty. Paper presented at 2016 Broadcast & Education Association, Las Vegas, USA.
  • Lochrie, M., & Coulton, P. (2011, November). Mobile phones as second screen for TV, enabling inter-audience interaction. In ACE’11Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. B. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, 0.
  • Louisse, D. (2015, January 29). Japan, Taiwan and Singapore top in multi-device users in APAC: Appier. Retrieved from https://e27.co/japan-taiwan-singapore-top-multi-device-users-apac-appier-20150129/
  • McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. M., Holbert, R. L., Zhang, W, …, Zubric, J. (1999). Understanding deliberation. The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum. Communication Research, 26, 743–774.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nielsen. (2013, March 20). New study confirms correlation between Twitter and TV ratings. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2013/new-study-confirms-correlation-between-twitter-and-tv-ratings.html
  • Nielsen. (2014, February). The digital consumer. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2014%20Reports/the-digital-consumer-report-feb-2014.pdf
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
  • Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities. Behavior & Information Technology, 20, 347–356.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Resnick, P. (2002). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI in the New Millennium (pp. 247–272). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Rojas, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Comunicación y participació npolíticaen Colombia. In H. Rojas, I. Perez, & H. Gil de Zúñiga, Comunicación y Comunidad. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
  • Saldaña, M., McGregor, S. C., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2015). Social media as a public space for politics: Cross-national comparison of news consumption and participatory behaviors in the United States and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3304–3326.
  • Sasseen, J., Olmstead, K., & Mitchell, A. (2013, September 13). Digital: As mobile grows rapidly, the pressures on news intensity. Retrieved from http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2013/digital-as-mobile-grows-rapidly-the-pressureson-news-intensify/#the-second-screen-phenomenon
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modelling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565.
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., …, McLeod, D. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57, 676–703.
  • Shin, D. H. (2013). Defining sociability and social presence in social TV. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 939–947.
  • Shin, D. H., & Kim, J. H. (2015). Social viewing behavior in social TV: Proposing a new concept of socio-usability. Online Information Review, 39, 416–434.
  • Skoric, M. M., Ying, D., & Ng, Y. (2009). Bowling online, not alone: Online social capital and political participation in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 414–433.
  • Song, J. H., & Hollenbeck, C. R. (2015). The value of social presence in mobile communications. The Service Industries Journal, 35, 611–632.
  • Soper, D. S. (2016). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89
  • Statista. (2016a). Internet penetration in Asia Pacific as of 1st quarter 2015, by country. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/281668/Internet-penetration-in-southeast-asian-countries/
  • Statista. (2016b). The last time you were using the Internet while watching TV, which of the following devices did you use for going online? Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/370981/second-screen-device-usage-taiwan/
  • Sullivan, J. (2013). Taiwan’s 2012 presidential election. Political Studies Review, 11, 65–74.
  • Tolbert C. J., & McNeal R. S. (2003) Unravelling the effects of the Internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, 56, 175–185.
  • Tsfati, Y., & Capella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30, 504–529.
  • TWNIC (Taiwan Network Information Center). (2015). 2015 Taiwan broadband usage survey. Retrieved fromWeb site : http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20160108e.pdf
  • Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65, 1041–1061.
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Verizon. (2012, May 10). 65% of Americans will use PC, smartphone, tablet while watching presidential debate. Retrieved from https://forums.verizon.com/t5/Verizon-at-Home/65-of-Americans-Will-Use-PC-Smartphone-Tablet-While-Watching/ba-p/487225
  • Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107–114.
  • Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17, 228.
  • Wang, S. I. (2007). Political use of the Internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17, 381–395.
  • Warren, C. (2013). When did the “second screen” become a thing? Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2013/05/02/second-screen/#W7wqpgMv5sqw
  • Wohn, D., & Na, E. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday, 16. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3368/2779

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.