A ‘Presidential Look’? An Analysis of Gender Framing in 2016 Persuasive Memes of Hillary Clinton

References

• ABC News. (2016). Donald Trump offends some with comment that Clinton lacks ‘presidential look’. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-offends-comment-clinton-lacks-presidential/story?id=41891411
   Google Scholar
• Bayerl, P. S., & Stoynov, L. (2016). Revenge by Photoshop: Memefying police acts in the public dialogue about injustice. New Media & Society, 18(6), 1006–1026. doi:10.1177/1461444814554747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beniot, W. (2011). Content analysis in political communication. In E. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical technique (pp. 268–282). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, G. R., Cook, J., Daniels, K., Dawkins, M., Kopish, J., Makar, M., … Zora, A. (2014). The political domain goes to twitter: Hashtags, retweets and URLs. Open Journal of Political Science, 4(1), 8–15. doi:10.4236/ojps.2014.41002
   Google Scholar
• Bump, P. (2017). The only groups have the majority approval of Trump? Republicans and whites without college degrees. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/02/24/the-only-groups-that-have-majority-approval-of-trump-republicans-and-whites-without-college-degrees/?tid=sm_fb&utm_term=.7ca1b81d49f7
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B., & Winfrey, K. L. (2009). Have you come a long way, baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and sexism in 2008 campaign coverage. Communication Studies, 60(4), 326–343. doi:10.1080/10510970903109904
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. J. (2009). Reflections on gender and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign: The good, the bad, and the misogynic. Politics & Gender, 5(01), 1–20. doi:10.1017/S1743923X09000014
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C., & Barnes, T. D. (2018). Reconciling sexism and women’s support for republican candidates: A look at gender, class, and whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 presidential races. Political Behavior, (1–24). doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9468-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 413–423. doi:10.1177/0146167299025004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, H. R. (2017). What Happened. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Congress, U. S. (2018). Senate. Select committee on intelligence. Unclassified Summary of Initial Findings on 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.burr.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/SSCI%20ICA%20ASSESSMENT_FINALJULY3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., & Rippere, P. S. (2016). He said, she said: The impact of candidate gender in negative campaigns. Politics & Gender, 12(02), 391–414. doi:10.1017/S1743923X15000550
   Google Scholar
• Croeser, S., & Highfield, T. (2014). Occupy Oakland and# oo: Uses of twitter within the occupy movement. First Monday, 19, 3. Retrieved from http://ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4827/3846
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice. (2018). Internet research agency indictment. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, T., Weeks, B. E., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2016). Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1875–1895. doi:10.1177/1461444815616224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Director of National Intelligence. (2017). Assessing Russian Activities and intentions in recent US elections. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Duchscherer, K. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2016). When memes are mean: Appraisals of and objections to stereotypic memes. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(3), 335–345. doi:10.1037/tps0000080
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2016). The political environment on social media. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finneman, T. (2015). Press portrayals of women politicians, 1870s–2000s: From “Lunatic” Woodhull to “Polarizing” Palin. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., & Karpf, D. (2015). Of big birds and bayonets: Hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 390–406. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 373–393. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardetto, D. (1997). Hillary rodham clinton, symbolic gender politics and the New York Times: January-November 1992. Political Communication, 14(2), 225–240. doi:10.1080/105846097199461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Getty Images. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.gettyimages.com/event/hillary-clinton-campaigns-in-south-carolina-ahead-of-primary-606655807#democratic-presidential-candidate-hillary-clinton-delvers-remarks-at-picture-id512076780
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1964). California psychological inventory: Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, V., Turban, D., Wasti, S., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship, 33(2), 397–418.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, B. J., & Grabe, M. E. (2018). Visual war: A content analysis of Clinton and Trump subreddits during the 2016 campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(4), 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., & Capelos, T. (2002). Gender stereotyping and candidate evaluation. In V. C. Ottati, et al. (Ed.), The social psychology of politics (pp. 29–53). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, M., & Ember, S. (2016). For election day influence, Twitter ruled social media. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/09/technology/for-election-day-chatter-twitter-ruled-social-media.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, G., & O’Donnell, V. (2006). Propaganda and Persuasion. Houston: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kharroub, T., & Bas, O. (2016). Social media and protests: An examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1973–1992. doi:10.1177/1461444815571914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. doi:10.1037/a0023557
   Google Scholar
• Kollany, B., Howard, P. N., & Woolley, S. C. (2016). Bots and automation over Twitter during the U.S. Election. Data Memo 2016.4. Oxford, UK: Project on Computational Propaganda. Retrieved from www.politicalbots.org.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. (2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th Era. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 479–490. doi:10.1177/106591290405700312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. G., & Rose, M. (2010). Hillary Clinton’s race for the White House: Gender politics & the media on the campaign trail. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2017). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, K., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2014). The positive case for negative campaigning. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McThomas, M., & Tesler, M. (2016). The growing influence of gender attitudes on public support for Hillary Clinton, 2008-2012. Politics & Gender, 12(1), 28–49. doi:10.1017/S1743923X15000562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks, L. (2012). Is she ‘Man Enough’? Women candidates, executive political offices, and news coverage. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 75–193. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Internet Institute. (n.d.). Computational propaganda. Retrieved from https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/computational-propaganda/
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, H. (1973). Men, women, and work: Reflections on the two-person career. In J. Huber (Ed.), Changing women in changing society (pp. 90–110). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D., & Smith, J. L. (2008). Subtle sexism? Examining vote preferences when women run against men for the presidency. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 29(4), 451–476. doi:10.1080/15544770802092576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., Abdulla, R., Rieder, B., Woltering, R., & Zach, L. (2015). Protest leadership in the age of social media. Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1088049
   Google Scholar
• Raynauld, V., Lalancette, M., & Tourigny-Koné, S. (2016). Political protest 2.0: Social media and the 2012 student strike in the province of Quebec, Canada. French Politics, 14(1), 1–29. doi:10.1057/fp.2015.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynauld, V., Richez, E., & Boudreau Morris, K. (2018). Canada is #IdleNoMore: Exploring dynamics of indigenous political and civic protest in the twitterverse. Information, Communication & Society, 21(4), 626. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/search/pictures?blob=Hillary+Clinton+South+Carolina&sortBy=relevance&dateRange=pastYear
   Google Scholar
• Saxonhouse, A. W. (1992). Introduction – Public and private: The paradigm of power. In B. Garlick, S. Dixon, & P. Allen (Eds.), Stereotype of women in power: Historical perspectives and revisionists’ views (pp. 1–9). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35, 245–266. doi:10.1111/pops.2014.35.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, H. (2014). Visual propaganda in the age of social media: An empirical analysis of twitter images during the 2012 Israeli–Hamas Conflict. Visual Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 150–161. doi:10.1080/15551393.2014.955501
   Google Scholar
• Shearer, E., & Gottfried, J. (2017). News use across social media platforms 2017. Pew Research Center, Journalism & Media. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017
   Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2015). Memes in digital culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snopes. (2016). Secret Agent M.D. Retrieved from http://www.snopes.com/clintons-secret-service-agent-holds-diazepam-pen/
   Google Scholar
• Spisak, B. R., Blaker, N. M., Lefevre, C. E., Moore, F. R., & Krebbers, K. F. (2014). A face for all seasons: Searching for context-specific leadership traits and discovering a general preference for perceived health. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 792. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the attitude toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 103–118. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00103.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tesler, M., & Sears, D. O. (2010). Obama’s race: The 2008 election and the dream of a post-racial America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, E. (2014). Beyond opinion leaders: How attempts to persuade foster political awareness and campaign learning. Communication Research, 41, 353–374. doi:10.1177/0093650212443824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timberg, C., & Dwoskin, E. (2018). Twitter is sweeping out fake accounts like never before, putting user growth at risk. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/07/06/twitter-is-sweeping-out-fake-accounts-like-never-before-putting-user-growth-risk/?utm_term=.35a3ba2f7de0
   Google Scholar
• Tweet Archivist. (n/d). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.tweetarchivist.com/about/faq
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., & Goren, L. J. (2011). What’s in a Name? Coverage of senator Hillary Clinton during the 2008 democratic primary. Political Research Quarterly, 64(4), 884–896. doi:10.1177/1065912910382302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, B. A., Book, A. S., & Volk, A. A. (2017). Is Hillary dishonest and Donald narcissistic? A HEXACO analysis of the presidential candidates’ public personas. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 281–286. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasike, B. (2017). Persuasion in 140 characters: Testing issue framing, persuasion and credibility via Twitter and online news articles in the gun control debate. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 179–190. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield, B. H. (1997). The making of an image: Hillary Rodham Clinton and American Journalists. Political Communication, 14(2), 241–253. doi:10.1080/105846097199470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar