From Admiration to Devotion? The Longitudinal Relation between Adolescents’ Involvement with and Viewing Frequency of Reality TV

References

• Bartsch, A. (2012). As time goes by: What changes and what remains the same in entertainment experience over the life span? Journal of Communication, 62(4), 588–608. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruh, L. (2010). Mediated voyeurism and the guilty pleasure of consuming reality television. Media Psychology, 13(3), 201–221. doi:10.1080/15213269.2010.502871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behm-Marowitz, E., Aubrey, J. J., Pennell, H., & Kim, K. B. (2019). Examining the effects of MTV’s 16 and Pregnant on adolescent girls’ sexual health: The implication of character affinity, pregnancy risk factors, and health literacy on message effectiveness. Health Communication, 34(2), 180–190. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1399506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Big Brother. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brother_(televisieprogramma)
   Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. doi:10.1080/15213260903287259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cato, M., & Dillman Carpentier, F. R. (2010). Conceptualizations of female empowerment and enjoyment of sexualized characters in reality television. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 270–288. doi:10.1080/15205430903225589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., Shen, L., & Wilson, K. (2014). Perceived realism: Dimensions and roles in narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 41(6), 828–851. doi:10.1177/0093650212450585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 187–202. doi:10.1177/0265407504041374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Howard, E. (2013). Emerging in a digital world: A decade review of media use, effects, and gratifications in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 125–137. doi:10.1177/2167696813479782
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, N., & Belcher, J. D. (2012). Reality bites: An investigation of the genre reality television and its relationship to viewers’ body image. Mass Communication and Society, 15(3), 407–431. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.583545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Expedition Robinson. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expedition_Robinson
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Franko, M., & Krieger, L. (2011). Reality on MTV. Gender portrayals on MTV reality programming. Los Angeles, CA: Parents Television Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, B., Hawkins, I., Redker, C., & Bushman, B. J. (2016). Narcissism on the Jersey Shore: Exposure to narcissistic reality TV characters can increase narcissism levels in viewers. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1037/ppm0000140
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, B., Thompson, J., Hou, B., & Bushman, B. J. (2016). Just “harmless entertainment”? Effects of surveillance reality TV on physical aggression. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 66–73. doi:10.1037/ppm0000040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godlewski, L. R., & Perse, E. M. (2010). Audience activity and reality television: Identification, online activity, and satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 58(2), 148–169. doi:10.1080/01463371003773358
   Google Scholar
• Hill, A., Weibull, L., & Nilsson, Å. (2007). Public and popular: British and Swedish audience trends in factual and reality television. Cultural Trends, 16(1), 17–41. doi:10.1080/09548960601106920
   Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults’ wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology, 7(4), 325–351. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0704_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igartua, -J.-J., & Barrios, I. (2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 514–531. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, B., & Kim, J. (2015). Television drama viewing and romantic beliefs: Considering parasocial interaction and attachment style. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(10), 51–60. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journal/index/3288
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509. doi:10.1086/268109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Hornik, R., & Hennessy, M. (2008). The reliability and stability of general media exposure measures. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(1–2), 6–22. doi:10.1080/19312450802063024
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Chen, Y.-S., & Harmon, M. (2016). Reality TV, materialism, and associated consequences: An exploration of the influences of enjoyment and social comparison on reality TV’s cultivation effects. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 24(4), 228–241. doi:10.1080/15456870.2016.1208659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. K., Ruth, A. M., & Park, T. D. (2008). Simply irresistible: Reality TV consumption patterns. Communication Quarterly, 56(2), 208–225. doi:10.1080/01463370802026828
   Google Scholar
• Martins, N., & Jensen, R. E. (2014). The relationship between “Teen Mom” reality programming and teenagers’ beliefs about teen parenthood. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6), 830–852. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.851701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2009). Cosmetic surgery makeover programs and intentions to undergo cosmetic enhancements: A consideration of three models of media effects. Human Communication Research, 35(1), 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., Biely, E. N., Morgan, S. J., & Stitt, C. R. (2003). Reality-based television programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology, 5(4), 303–330. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0504_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen. (2009). Nielsen 2009 report on television. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann-Lenz, J., Gölz, H., & Schenk, M. (2018). Why do adolescents watch scripted reality-TV? A typology based on viewing motives. In R. Kühne, S. E. Baumgartner, T. Koch, & M. Hofer (Eds.), Youth and media. Current perspectives on media use and effects (pp. 19–38). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opree, S. J., & Kühne, R. (2016). Generation Me in the spotlight: Linking reality TV to materialism, entitlement, and narcissism. Mass Communication and Society, 19(6), 800–819. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1199706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., & Mendelson, A. L. (2007). An exploratory study of reality appeal: Uses and gratifications of reality TV shows. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 355–370. doi:10.1080/08838150701307152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patino, A., Kaltcheva, V. D., & Smith, M. F. (2011). The appeal of reality television for teen and pre-teen audiences: The power of “connectedness” and psycho-demographics. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 288–297. doi:10.2501/JAR-51-1-288-297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poniewozik, J. (2006, February 6). Phony quotes, bogus crushes, enhances villains: The makes of “unscripted” TV spill its secrets. Retrieved from http://www.resource2.rockyview.ab.ca/ssela101/related_reads/how_reality_tv_fakes_it.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pozner, J. L. (2010). Reality bites back. The troubling truth about guilty pleasure TV. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Ben-Horin, A. (1996). Adolescent idolization of pop singers: Causes, expressions, and reliance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25(5), 631–650. doi:10.1007/BF01537358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, S., & Wiltz, J. (2004). Why people watch reality TV. Media Psychology, 6(4), 363–378. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0604_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14(2), 246–268. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2013). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. doi:10.1086/209528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar