References
- Alonzo, M., & Aiken, M. (2004). Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems, 36(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00190-2
- Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009
- Anderson, A. A., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2016). Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw022.
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
- Callegaro, M. (2008). Social desirability. In L. Paul (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 825–826). SAGE Publications.
- Chia, S. C. (2006). How peers mediate media influence on adolescents’ sexual attitudes and sexual behavior. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00302.x
- Chia, S. C. (2010). How social influence mediates media effects on adolescents’ materialism. Communication Research, 37(3), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362463
- Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
- Cohen, J., Mutz, D., Price, V., & Gunther, A. (1988). Perceived impact of defamation: An experiment on third-person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1086/269092
- Cohen, J., & Tsfati, Y. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence on strategic voting. Communication Research, 36(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333026
- Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763
- Duck, J. M., & Mullin, B. A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250107.
- Gervais, B. T. (2017). More than mimicry? The role of anger in uncivil reactions to elite political incivility. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw010.
- Grimm, P. (2010). Social desirability bias. In J. Sheth & N. Malhotra (Eds.), Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing (pp. 258). Wiley.
- Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the X‐rating: The third‐person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00712.x
- Gunther, A. C., Bolt, D., Borzekowski, D. L., Liebhart, J. L., & Dillard, J. P. (2006). Presumed influence on peer norms: How mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00002.x
- Gunther, A. C., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000107
- Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
- Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: Civility and incivility in American politics. Temple University Press.
- Huh, J., & Langteau, R. (2007). Presumed influence of direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising on patients: The physician’s perspective. Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360312
- Hwang, H., Kim, Y., & Huh, C. U. (2014). Seeing is believing: Effects of uncivil online debate on political polarization and expectations of deliberation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966365
- Hwang, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2018). Influence of discussion incivility on deliberation: An examination of the mediating role of moral indignation. Communication Research, 45(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215616861
- Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034
- Jensen, J. D., & Hurley, R. J. (2005). Third‐person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability, and presumed behavior. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02670.x
- Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89–112). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Lee, E. J., & Tandoc, E. C., Jr. (2017). When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12123
- Lim, J. S. (2017). The third-person effect of online advertising of cosmetic surgery: A path model for predicting restrictive versus corrective actions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 972–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016687722
- Lim, J. S., & Golan, G. J. (2011). Social media activism in response to the influence of political parody videos on YouTube. Communication Research, 38(5), 710–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211405649
- McLeod, D. M., Detenber, B. H., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2001). Behind the third‐person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51(4), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02902.x.
- Muddiman, A. (2017). Personal and public levels of political incivility. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3182–3202. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6137.
- Mutz, D. C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton University Press.
- Nabi, R. (2002). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs, 69(3), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216541
- O’Sullivan, P. B., & Flanagin, A. J. (2003). Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages. New Media & Society, 5(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005001908
- Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444
- Perloff, R. M. (2002). The Third-Person Effect. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 489–506). Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
- Prochazka, F., Weber, P., & Schweiger, W. (2018). Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality. Journalism Studies, 19(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1161497
- Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
- Rösner, L., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Verbal venting in the social web: Effects of anonymity and group norms on aggressive language use in online comments. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664220
- Rösner, L., Winter, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Dangerous minds? Effects of uncivil online comments on aggressive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.022
- Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
- Shin, D. H., & Kim, J. K. (2011). Alcohol product placements and the third-person effect. Television & New Media, 12(5), 412–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476410385477
- Stroud, N. J., Van Duyn, E., & Peacock, C. (2016). Survey of commenters and comment readers. Center for Media Engagement. https://mediaengagement.org/research/survey-of-commenters-and-comment-readers/
- Sun, Y. (2012). When presumed influence turns real. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 371–387). SAGE Publications.
- Tal-Or, N., Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2010). Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research, 37(6), 801–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362684
- Tal-Or, N., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 99–112). SAGE Publications.
- Tewksbury, D., Moy, P., & Weis, D. S. (2004). Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02618.x
- Tsfati, Y., Ribak, R., & Cohen, J. (2005). Rebelde way in Israel: Parental perceptions of television influence and monitoring of children’s social and media activities. Mass Communication & Society, 8(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0801_2
- Xu, J., & Gonzenbach, W. J. (2008). Does a perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn031
- Ziegele, M., Jost, P., Bormann, M., & Heinbach, D. (2018). Journalistic counter-voices in comment sections: Patterns, determinants, and potential consequences of interactive moderation of uncivil user comments. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 7(4), 525–554. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-4-525
- Zimmerman, A. G., & Ybarra, G. J. (2016). Online aggression: The influences of anonymity and social modeling. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000038
- Zipursky, B. C. (2010). Snyder v. Phelps, outrageousness, and the open texture of tort law. DePaul Law Review, 60(2), 473–520. https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol60/iss2/11.