2,422
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Character Engagement and Moral Adjustment Model (CEMAM): A Synthesis of More than Six Decades of Research

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Appiah, O. (2001). Ethnic identification on adolescents’ evaluations of advertisements. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-41-5-7-22
  • Appiah, O. (2002). Black and White viewers’ perception and recall of occupational characters on television. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02573.x
  • Aubrey, J. S. (2004). Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles, 50(7), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023070.87195.07
  • Bálint, K., & Tan, E. S. (2019). Absorbed character engagement: From social cognition responses to the experience with fictional constructions. In J. Riis & A. Taylor (Eds.), Screening characters: Theories of character in film, television, and interactive media (pp. 209–229). Routledge.
  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
  • Bleakley, A., Ellithorpe, M. E., & Hennessy, M. (2019). Understanding the nature of media effects from onscreen exposure to alcohol, sex, and their combination. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.023
  • Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
  • Brown, W. J. (2015). Examining four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship. Communication Theory, 25(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12053
  • Busselle, R. W., & Shrum, L. J. (2003). Media exposure and exemplar accessibility. Media Psychology, 5(3), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0503_02
  • Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude of positive and negative reinforcements as a determinant of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(6), 884–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022656
  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
  • Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
  • Cohen, J., & Klimmt, C. (2021). Stepping in and out of media characters: Identification and dynamic shifts in users’ positioning toward entertainment messages. In P. Vorderer & C. Klimmt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 267–284). Oxford University Press.
  • Crawford, M. A.; Tobacco Control Network Writing Group. (2001). Cigarette smoking and adolescents: Messages they see and hear. Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974), 1(Suppl 1), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/116.S1.203
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594
  • DeScioli, P. (2016). The side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.002
  • Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
  • Eden, A., Oliver, M. B., Tamborini, R., Limperos, A., & Woolley, J. (2015). Perceptions of moral violations and personality traits among heroes and villains. Mass Communication and Society, 18(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.923462
  • Eden, A., & Tamborini, R. (2017). Moral intuitions: Morality subcultures in disposition formation. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 29(4), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000173
  • Eden, A., Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., Lewis, R., Weber, R., & Prabhu, S. (2014). Repeated exposure to narrative entertainment and the salience of moral intuitions. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12098
  • Eyal, K., & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
  • Francemone, C. J., Grizzard, M., Fitzgerald, K., Huang, J., & Ahn, C. (2022). Character gender and disposition formation in narratives: The role of competing schema. Media Psychology, 25(4), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.2006718
  • Frazer, R., Grizzard, M., Francemone, C. J., Fitzgerald, K., & Henry, C. (2022). Character individuation and disposition formation: An experimental exploration. Media Psychology, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2113897
  • Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
  • Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
  • Grizzard, M., Fitzgerald, K., & Francemone, C. J. (2021a). Validating a set of retribution narratives for use in media psychology research. Communication Studies, 72(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1820545
  • Grizzard, M., Fitzgerald, K., Francemone, C. J., Ahn, C., Huang, J., Walton, J., … Eden, A. (2020). Validating the extended character morality questionnaire. Media Psychology, 23(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1572523
  • Grizzard, M., Fitzgerald, K., Francemone, C. J., Ahn, C., Huang, J., Walton, J., & Lewis, R. J. (2021b). Narrative retribution and cognitive processing. Communication Research, 48(4), 527–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219886512
  • Grizzard, M., Francemone, C. J., Fitzgerald, K., Huang, J., & Ahn, C. (2020). Interdependence of narrative characters: Implications for media theories. Journal of Communication, 70(2), 274–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa005
  • Grizzard, M., Francemone, C. J., Frazer, R., Fitzgerald, K., Monge, C. K., & Henry, C. (inpress). A comprehensive experimental test of the affective disposition theory of drama. Journal of Communication.
  • Grizzard, M., Huang, J., Ahn, C., Fitzgerald, K., Francemone, C. J., & Walton, J. (2020). The Gordian knot of disposition theory. Journal of Media Psychology, 32(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000257
  • Grizzard, M., Huang, J., Fitzgerald, K., Ahn, C., & Chu, H. (2018). Sensing heroes and villains: Character-schema and the disposition formation process. Communication Research, 45(4), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699934
  • Hahn, L. (2021). Moral clarity decreases as viewer age increases: A content analysis of the moral values and reinforcement cues depicted in popular US children’s television. Journal of Children and Media, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1943475
  • Hahn, L., Tamborini, R., Prabhu, S., Grall, C., Novotny, E., & Klebig, B. (2021) Narrative media’s emphasis on distinct moral intuitions alters early adolescents’ judgments. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000307.
  • Harms, W., & Skyrms, B. (2008). Evolution of moral norms. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Oxford handbook on the philosophy of biology (pp. 434-450). Oxford University Press.
  • Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
  • Hoffner, C. (1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364360
  • Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults’ wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology, 7(4), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0704_2
  • Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 63–101). Erlbaum.
  • Hopp, F. R., Fisher, J. T., & Weber, R. (2020). A graph-learning approach for detecting moral conflict in movie scripts. Media and Communication, 8(3), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3155
  • Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  • Kinsella, E. L., Ritchie, T. D., & Igou, E. R. (2015). Zeroing in on heroes: A prototype analysis of hero features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038463
  • Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J., Fiskaali, A., Høgh-Olesen, H., Johnson, J. A., Smith, M., & Clasen, M. (2020). Do dark personalities prefer dark characters? A personality psychological approach to positive engagement with fictional villainy. Poetics, 85, 101511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101511
  • Kleemans, M., Eden, A., Daalmans, S., van Ommen, M., & Weijers, A. (2017). Explaining the role of character development in the evaluation of morally ambiguous characters in entertainment media. Poetics, 60, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.10.003
  • Klimmt, C., Hefner, D., & Vorderer, P. (2009). The video game experience as “true” identification: A theory of enjoyable alterations of players’ self-perception. Communication Theory, 19(4), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01347.x
  • Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2005). Some like it bad: Testing a model for perceiving and experiencing fictional characters. Media Psychology, 7(2), 107–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_1
  • Konijn, E. A., Nije Bijvank, M., & Bushman, B. J. (2007). I wish I were a warrior: The role of wishful identification in the effects of violent video games on aggression in adolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1038. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1038
  • Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2015). The dual role of morally ambiguous characters: Examining the effect of morality salience on narrative responses. Human Communication Research, 41(3), 390–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12050
  • Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
  • Lewis, N., & Weaver, A. J. (2016). Emotional responses to social comparisons in reality television programming. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 28(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000151
  • Lindström, B., Jangard, S., Selbing, I., & Olsson, A. (2018). The role of a “common is moral” heuristic in the stability and change of moral norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 147(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000365
  • Mares, M. L., & Cantor, J. (1992). Elderly viewers’ responses to televised portrayals of old age: Empathy and mood management versus social comparison. Communication Research, 19(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019004004
  • McCall, R. B., & McGhee, P. E. (1977). The discrepancy hypothesis of attention and affect in infants. In U. I.č & F. Weizmann. (Eds.), The structuring of experience (pp. 179-211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8786-6_7
  • Mead, E. L., Rimal, R. N., Ferrence, R., & Cohen, J. E. (2014). Understanding the sources of normative influence on behavior: The example of tobacco. Social Science & Medicine, 115, 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.030
  • Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513
  • Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096700
  • Moskowitz, G. B., & Gill, M. J. (2013). Person perception. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 918–942). Oxford University Press.
  • Oatley, K., & Duncan, E. (1994). The experience of emotions in everyday life. Cognition & Emotion, 8(4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939408408947
  • Onu, D., Kessler, T., & Smith, J. R. (2016). Admiration: A conceptual review. Emotion Review, 8(3), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915610438
  • Raney, A. A. (2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00319.x
  • Raney, A. A., & Janicke, S. H. (2012). How we enjoy and why we seek out morally complex characters in media entertainment . In R. Tamborini (Ed.), Media and the moral mind (pp. 176–193). Routledge.
  • Reeves, B., & Greenberg, B. S. (1977). Children’s perception of television characters. Human Communication Research, 3(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00510.x
  • Rosengren, K. E., Windahl, S., Hakansson, P. A., & Johnsson-Smaragdi, U. (1976). Adolescents’ TV relations: Three scales. Communication Research, 3(4), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300401
  • Sanders, M. S. (2010). Making a good (bad) impression: Examining the cognitive processes of disposition theory to form a synthesized model of media character impression formation. Communication Theory, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01358.x
  • Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? A Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(4), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n04_02
  • Schultz, N. W., & Huet, L. M. (2001). Sensational! violent! popular! death in American movies. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 42(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.2190/6GDX-4W40-5B94-MX0G
  • Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 2307–2919. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
  • Slater, M. D., Johnson, B. K., Cohen, J., Comello, M. L. G., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2014). Temporarily expanding the boundaries of the self: Motivations for entering the story world and implications for narrative effects. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12100
  • Tamborini, R. (2013). Model of intuitive morality and exemplars. In R. Tamborini (Ed.), Media and the moral mind (pp. 43–74). Routledge.
  • Tamborini, R., Grady, S. M., Baldwin, J., McClaran, N., & Lewis, R. (2021). The narrative enjoyment and appreciation rationale. In P. Vorderer & C. Klimmt (Eds.)The Oxford Handbook of Entertainment Theory (pp. 45-62). Oxford University Press.
  • Tamborini, R., Grall, C., Prabhu, S., Hofer, M., Novotny, E., Hahn, L., … Sethi, N. (2018). Using attribution theory to explain the affective dispositions of tireless moral monitors toward narrative characters. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 842–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy049
  • Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., Hahn, L., Kryston, K., & Ulusoy, E. (2021). The role of narrative cues in shaping ADT: What makes audience think that good things happen to good people. In P. Vorderer & C. Klimmt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 321-342). Oxford University Press.
  • Tamborini, R., Weber, R., Eden, A., Bowman, N. D., & Grizzard, M. (2010). Repeated exposure to daytime soap opera and shifts in moral judgment toward social convention. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(4), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2010.519806
  • Thomson, A. L., & Siegel, J. T. (2017). Elevation: A review of scholarship on a moral and other-praising emotion. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(6), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1269184
  • Trepte, S. (2008). Cultural proximity in TV entertainment: An eight-country study on the relationship of nationality and the evaluation of U.S. prime-time fiction. 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2008.001
  • Tsay-Vogel, M., & Krakowiak, K. M. (2019). The virtues and vices of social comparisons: Examining assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to characters in a narrative. Motivation and Emotion, 43(4), 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09756-y
  • Weber, R., Eden, A., & Mathiak, K. (2011, June). Seeing bad people punished makes us think alike: Social norm violations in television drama elicit cortical synchronization in viewers. In Annual meeting of the International communication association, Boston, MA.
  • Weber, R., Tamborini, R., Lee, H. E., & Stipp, H. (2008). Soap opera exposure and enjoyment: A longitudinal test of disposition theory. Media Psychology, 11(4), 462–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802509993
  • Weijers, G. W. M. (2014). The craft of screenwriting. Boom Lemma.
  • Zillmann, D. (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 135–167). Erlbaum.
  • Zillmann, D. (1995). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 23(1–2), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00020-7
  • Zillmann, D. (1999). Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_5
  • Zillmann, D. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In I. Bondebjerg (Ed.), Moving images, culture, and the mind (pp. 53–63). University of Luton Press.
  • Zillmann, D. (2006). Dramaturgy for emotions from fictional narration. Erlbaum.
  • Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1975). Viewer’s moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(6), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90008-6