References
- Ali, C. (2021). Farm fresh broadband: The politics of rural connectivity. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12822.001.0001
- Apostolides, A., & Meylahn, J.-A. (2014). The lived theology of the Harry Potter series. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 70(1), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V70I1.2713
- Bell, M. M., Lloyd, S. E., & Vatovec, C. (2010). Activating the countryside: Rural power, the power of the rural and the making of rural politics. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00512.x
- Bevans, S. B. (2002). Models of contextual theology. Orbis Books.
- Braman, S. (2003). Facing in: Researchers and academia. In S. Braman (Ed.), Communication researchers and policy-making (pp. 415–434). The MIT Press.
- Brown, D., & Blevins, J. (2008). Can the FCC still ignore the public? Interviews with two commissioners who listened. Television & New Media, 9(6), 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476408315503
- Busby, J., & Tanberk, J. (2020). FCC underestimates Americans unserved by broadband internet by 50%. BroadbandNow. https://broadbandnow.com/research/fccunderestimates-unserved-by-50-percent.
- Cavalcante, A. (2018). Struggling for ordinary: Media and transgender belonging in everyday life. NYU Press.
- Chao, B., & Park, C. (2020). The cost of connectivity 2020. Open Technology Institute. http://newamerica.org/oti/reports/cost-connectivity-2020/
- Crawford, S. (2019). Fiber: The coming tech revolution—and why America might miss it. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300240641
- Donmoyer, R. (2012). Two (very) different worlds: The cultures of policymaking and qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 798–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412453128
- Dubois, V. (2015). Critical policy ethnography. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 462–480). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Dumas, M., & Anderson, G. L. (2014). Qualitative research as policy knowledge: Framing policy problems and transforming education from the ground up. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 11. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n11.2014
- Dunbar-Hester, C. (2014). Low power to the people: Pirates, protest, and politics in FM radio Activism. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028127.001.0001
- FCC. (2020). 2020 broadband deployment report ( FCC 20-50). Washington DC: Federal Communications Commission. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-50A1.pdf
- Felski, R. (1999). The invention of everyday life. New Formations, 1999(39), 15–31. .
- Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924264X.001.0001
- Foss, K. A., & Foss, S. K. (1994). Personal experience as evidence in feminist scholarship. Western Journal of Communication, 58(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319409374482
- Freedman, D. (2006). Do scholars matter? Some reasons for the declining influence of academics on the policy-making process. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 2(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.2.1.87/3
- Freedman, D. (2008). The politics of media policy. Polity.
- Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
- Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146027
- Handke, C., & Herzog, C. (2019). Testing for causality in data: Experiments. In H. Van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, & L. Van Audenhove (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research (pp. 233–247). Springer International Publishing.
- Herzog, C., & Ali, C. (2015). Elite interviewing in media and communications policy research. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 11(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.11.1.37_1
- Holman, J., & McGregor, M. (2001). “Thank you for taking the time to read this”: Public participation via new communication technologies at the FCC. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 2(4), 158–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/152263790100200401
- Horwitz, R. (1991). The irony of regulatory reform: The deregulation of American telecommunications. Oxford University Press.
- Just, N., & Puppis, M., Eds.2012. Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects. Intellect Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvj36.
- Karpinnen, K., & Moe, H. (2019). Document Analysis. In H. Van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, & L. Van Audenhove (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research (pp. 249–262). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Katz, E., Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
- Kincheloe, J., & McLaren, P. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138–157). Sage.
- Kirkpatrick, B. (2013). Vernacular policymaking and the cultural turn in media policy studies: Vernacular policymaking. Communication Culture & Critique, 6(4), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12034
- Lefebvre, H. (2014). Critique of everyday life: The one-volume edition. Verso.
- Lentz, B. (2011). Regulation as linguistic engineering. In R. Mansell & M. Raboy (Eds.), The handbook of global media and community policy (pp. 432–448). Wiley.
- Lunt, P. (2019). Focus Groups. Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M. Donders, K., & Van Audenhove, L. (Eds). The palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research. pp. 199–213. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Marsh, C. (2017). Introduction. In C. Marsh, P. Slade, & S. Azaransky (Eds.), Lived Theology: New perspectives, on method, style, and pedagogy (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
- Matheny, P. D. (2012). Contextual theology: The drama of our times. James Clarke. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cgf9rs.
- Mathews, N., & Ali, C. (2022). Desert work: life and labor in a news and broadband desert. Mass Communication & Society, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2093749
- Mathews, N., Ali, C., & Pearce, K. (2022). ”Come on f––er, just load!” Powerlessness, waiting, and life without broadband. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac020
- McAleese, S., & Kilty, J. M. (2019). Stories matter: Reaffirming the value of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 24(4), 822–845. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3713
- Napoli, P. (2001). Foundations of communication policy. Hampton Press.
- Newman, R. (2019). The paradoxes of network neutralities. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11040.001.0001
- Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
- Peacock, A. (2019). Human rights and the digital divide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351046794
- Potschka, C. (2012). Towards a market in broadcasting: Communications policy in the UK and Germany. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370197
- Puppis, M., & Van den Bulck, H. (2019). Doing media policy research. In H. Van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, & L. Van Audenhove (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research (pp. 23–49). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Radway, J. (1989). Ethnography among elites: Comparing discourses of power. The Journal of Communication Inquiry, 13(2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/019685998901300201
- Raghunath, P. (2020). Community radio policies in South Asia: A deliberative policy approach. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5629-6
- Sallet, J. (2019). Broadband for America’s future: A vision for the 2020s. Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. https://www.benton.org/publications/broadband-policy2020s
- Schram, S. F., Shdaimah, C., & Stahl, R. (2013). When you can see the sky through your roof: Policy analysis from the bottom up. In E. Schatz (Ed.), Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power (pp. 255–274). University of Chicago Press.
- Slade, P. (2017). The risks and responsibilities of lived theology. In C. Marsh, P. Slade, & S. Azaransky (Eds.), Lived theology: New perspectives on method, style, and pedagogy (pp. 44–53). Oxford University Press.
- Thompson, W. B. (2001). Policy sciences, 34(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010353113519
- Turner Lee, N. (2020, April 2). From rural digital divides to local solutions. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/longform/from-rural-digital-divides-to-local-solutions/
- Van Audenhove, L., & Donders, K. (2019). Talking to people III: Expert interviews and elite interviews. In H. Van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, & L. Van Audenhove (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research (pp. 179–197). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Van den Bulck, H., & Donders, K. (2014). Of discourses, stakeholders and advocacy coalitions in media policy: Tracing negotiations towards the new management contract of Flemish public broadcaster VRT. European Journal of Communication, 29(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113509362
- Van den Bulck, H., Van Audenhove, L., Donders, K., Puppis, M., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L., Van den Bulck, H., Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., & Van Audenhove, L. Eds. (2019). The palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4