From Incidental Exposure to COVID-19 Coping: The Influence of Expression and Perceived Networks on Social Media and Messaging Apps

References

• Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Diehl, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2019). Antecedents of internal political efficacy incidental news exposure online and the mediating role of political discussion. Politics, 39(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395717693251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., & Xenos, M. A. (2021). Social media news deserts: Digital inequalities and incidental news exposure on social media platforms. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211059529
   Google Scholar
• Bernacer, J., García-Manglano, J., Camina, E., Güell, F., & Idler, E. L. (2021). Polarization of beliefs as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Spain. PloS One, 16(7), e0254511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on facebook, twitter, instagram, and snapchat in the 2016 US election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. (2016). Social network sites and political engagement: Exploring the impact of facebook connections and uses on political protest and participation. Mass Communication and Society, 19(4), 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1161803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T., Kim, Y., & Chan, M. (2022). Just a glance, or more? Pathways from counter-attitudinal incidental exposure to attitude (de) polarization through response behaviors and cognitive elaboration. Journal of Communication, 72(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an OSROR model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearhart, S., & Zhang, W. (2015). “Was it something I said?”“No, it was something you posted!” a study of the spiral of silence theory in social media contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021). WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism: Exploring direct, indirect and generational effects. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., & Chen, H. T. (2022). How does multi-platform docial media use lead to biased news rngagement? Examining the role of counter-attitudinal incidental exposure, cognitive elaboration, and network eomogeneity. Social Media+ Society, 8(4), 205630512211291. 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221129140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, E. (2021, June 8). Vaccines become political as Taiwan wakes up to COVID reality. Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Coronavirus/COVID-vaccines/Vaccines-become-political-as-Taiwan-wakes-up-to-COVID-reality
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., Chinn, S., & Soroka, S. (2020). Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42(5), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020950735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2019). Does incidental exposure on social media equalize or reinforce participatory gaps? Evidence from a panel study. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2463–2482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819850755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, J., & Tan, C. H. K. (2021). Choosing a social media platform: Genre and social ties in urban Malaysia. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1–21. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Jang, S. M., & Chung, M. (2022). Can we blame social media for polarization? counter-evidence against filter bubble claims during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society, 146144482210995. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos, A. (2021). Who shares news on mobile messaging applications, why and in what ways? A cross-national analysis. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920958442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. H., & Ellison, N. B. (2022). From observation on social media to offline political participation: The social media affordances approach. New Media & Society, 24(2), 2614–2634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821998346
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. H., & Kwak, N. (2022). When does incidental exposure prompt political participation? cross-national research on the importance of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Communication, 16(22), 1737–1758. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17479
   Google Scholar
• Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Friendship and politics don’t mix? The role of sociability for online political talk. Information, Communication & Society, 24(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1635185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C.-H., & Tang, T. (2022). Information exposure and information overload as antecedents of crisis communicative responses and coping: A cross-country comparison. American Behavioral Scientist, 000276422211328. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221132805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Rojas, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2022). Social media, messaging apps, and affective polarization in the United States and Japan. Mass Communication and Society, 25(5), 673–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1953534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Xenos, M. (2022). Incidental news exposure via social media and political participation: Evidence of reciprocal effects. New Media & Society, 24(1), 178–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820962121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, R., & Lai, C. H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P. L. (2020). COVID-19 information seeking on digital media and preventive behaviors: The mediation role of worry. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(10), 677–682. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. (2019). Incidental exposure to political disagreement on Facebook and corrective participation: Unraveling the effects of emotional responses and issue relevance. International Journal of Communication, 13, 874–896. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2019). Stumbling upon the other side: Incidental learning of counter-attitudinal political information on Facebook. New Media & Society, 21(1), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818793421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., & Liedke, J. (2021, August 24). About four-in-ten Americans say social media is an important way of following COVID-19 vaccine news. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/08/24/about-four-in-ten-americans-say-social-media-is-an-important-way-of-following-covid-19-vaccine-news/
   Google Scholar
• Nanz, A., & Matthes, J. (2022). Democratic consequences of incidental exposure to political information: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 72(3), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2005). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2018). The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjit, Y. S., Shin, H., First, J. M., & Houston, J. B. (2021). COVID-19 protective model: The role of threat perceptions and informational cues in influencing behavior. Journal of Risk Research, 24(3–4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1887328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheinfeld, E., Gangi, K., Nelson, E. C., & Sinardi, C. C. (2022). Please scream inside your heart: Compounded loss and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Communication, 37(10), 1316–1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1886413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, F. M., & Weinmann, C. (2023). In need of the devil’s advocate? The impact of cross-cutting exposure on political discussion. Political Behavior, 45(1), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09706-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2023). Share of respondents using instant messaging in Taiwan as of March 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1346599/taiwan-penetration-of-instant-messaging/
   Google Scholar
• Sude, D. J., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Robinson, M. J., & Westerwick, A. (2019). “Pick and choose” opinion climate: How browsing of political messages shapes public opinion perceptions and attitudes. Communication Monographs, 86(4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1612528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A. J., & Maddex, B. D. (2001). Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the world wide web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., & Hahn, L. B. (2022). Online incidental exposure to news can minimize interest-based political knowledge gaps: Evidence from two U.S. elections. The International Journal of Press/politics, 27(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221991550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. C. S., & Yang, J. Z. (2021). Beyond party lines: The roles of compassionate goals, affect heuristic, and risk perception on Americans’ support for coronavirus response measures. Journal of Risk Research, 24(3–4), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1864012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, M., & Morey, A. C. (2019). Incidental news exposure on social media: A campaign communication mediation approach. Social Media+society, 5(2), 205630511984361. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119843619
   Google Scholar
• Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, W. (2019). How risk communication via Facebook and twitter shapes behavioral intentions: The case of fine dust pollution in South Korea. Journal of Health Communication, 24(7–8), 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1655607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar