Can I Trust What You Say about the Smart Speaker? Effects of AI Anxiety and Biased Assimilation on Blog Comment Credibility

References

• Aaker, D. A. (1992). Managing brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 56, 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D., Chorpita, B., & Turovsky, J. (1996). Fear, panic, anxiety, and disorders of emotions. In H. DA (Ed.), Perspectives on Anxiety, Panic, & Fear. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, M. J., Shimp, T. A., & Sprott, D. E. (1999). Product ownership as a moderator of self-congruity effects. Marketing Letters, 10(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008091225061
   Google Scholar
• Beckers, J. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2001). The structure of computer anxiety: A six-factor model. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00036-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boysen, G. A., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization in response to learning about biological explanations of homosexuality. Sex Roles, 57(9–10), 755–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9256-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science-Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S., Fink, E. L., & Kaplowitz, S. A. (2008). The comparative statics and dynamics of beliefs: The effect of message discrepancy and source credibility. Communication Monographs, 75(2), 158–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802082060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27745097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craciun, G., & Moore, K. (2019). Credibility of negative online product reviews: Reviewer gender, reputation and emotion effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Pinto, D. C., Herter, M. M., Sampaio, C. H., & Babin, B. J. (2020). Customer engagement in social media: A framework and meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(6), 1211–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00731-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun, İ., & TümerKabadayi, E. (2013). Resistance to persuasion in an anti‐consumption context: Biased assimilation of positive product information. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(2), 93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. (2015). Incivility online: Affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.997416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giese, J., & Sojka, J. (1998). The relationship between processing styles and self-control behavioral characteristics. Marketing Letters, 9(4), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008093501662
   Google Scholar
• Hair, M., & Ozcan, T. (2018). How reviewers’ use of profanity affects perceived usefulness of online reviews. Marketing Letters, 29(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-018-9459-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassani, H., Huang, X., & Silva, E. S. (2019). Fusing big data, blockchain, and cryptocurrency. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. C., Kahn, L., & Macdonald, J. (2023). Adopting AI: How familiarity breeds both trust and contempt. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01666-5
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S., Ahmmed, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Rabnawaz, A., & Jianzhou, Y. (2017). eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer’s information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2018). Influence of discussion incivility on deliberation: An examination of the mediating role of moral indignation. Communication Research, 45(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215616861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, F., & Russel, F. M. (2019). Civility, credibility and health information. Public Understanding of Science, 528(3), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., Coe, K., & Rains, S. A. (2020). Perceptions of uncivil discourse online: An examination of types and predictors. Communication Research, 47(6), 795–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Hwang, H. (2019). When partisans see media coverage as hostile: The effect of uncivil online comments on hostile media effect. Media Psychology, 22(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1554492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozik, R., Pawlicka, A., Pawlicki, M., Choraś, M., Mazurczyk, W., & Cabaj, K. (2023). A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art automated fake news detection methods. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3296627
   Google Scholar
• Kummer, T. F., Recker, J., & Bick, M. (2017). Technology-induced anxiety: Manifestations, cultural influences, and its effect on the adoption of sensor-based technology in German and Australian hospitals. Information & Management, 54(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J. (2010). The more humanlike, the better? How speech type and users’ cognitive style affect social responses to computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J. (2012). That’s not the way it is: How user-generated comments on the news affect perceived media bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C. (2014). Impacts of decision-making biases on eWOM re-trust and risk-reducing strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L. C., Chang, W. P., & Chang, H. H. (2014). Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafael, A., Gottschalk, S. A., & Kreis, H. (2016). Examining biased assimilation of Brand related online reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. The Journalism Quarterly, 65(3), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908806500301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsin, M., Jamil, K., Naseem, S., Sarfraz, M., & Ivascu, L. (2022). Elongating nexus between workplace factors and knowledge hiding behavior. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 441–457. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S348467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A., & Stroud, N. J. (2017). News values, cognitive biases, and partisan incivility in comment sections. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 586–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2007). Effects of “in-your-face” television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. The American Political Science Review, 101(4), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540707044X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oschatz, C., Niederdeppe, J., & Liu, J. (2021). The role of prior attitudes in narrative persuasion: Evidence from a cross-national study in Germany and the United States. Communication Monographs, 89(3), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.2011344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polley, P. J. (2018). Social perceptions of artificial intelligence. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/212976689.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. (2023). Smart speaker trends. Kantar Media. https://www.kantarmedia.com/news-and-resources/smart-speaker-trends
   Google Scholar
• Prochazka, F., Weber, P., & Schweiger, W. (2018). Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality. Journalism Studies, 19(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Citizen’s adoption of an e-government system: Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT). Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rim, H., & Song, D. (2016). How negative becomes less negative: Understanding the effects of comment valence and response sidedness in social media. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösner, L., Winter, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Dangerous minds? Effects of uncivil online comments on aggressive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, I. (2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, C. R., & Sagarin, R. J. (2006). Indecent influence. Social Influence, 1(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510600747597
   Google Scholar
• Schlag, M., & Imhof, M. (2017). Does perceived ease of use mitigate computer anxiety and stimulate self-regulated learning for pre-service teacher students? International Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n3p154
   Google Scholar
• Schlebusch, C. L. (2018). Computer anxiety, computer self-efficacy and attitudes towards the internet of first year students at a South African University of Technology. Africa Education Review, 15(3), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1341291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Guo, H., Zhang, S., Xie, F., Wang, J., Sun, Z., Dong, X., Sun, T., & Fan, L. (2018). Impact of workplace incivility against new nurses on job burn-out: A cross-sectional study in China. British Medical Journal Open, 8(4), e020461. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, R., Messaris, P., & Cappella, J. N. (2014). Effects of online comments on smokers’ perception of antismoking public service announcements. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., Chen, Y., Lillicrap, T., Hui, F., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. (2017). Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. Nature, 550(7676), 354. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2023). Smart speakers. https://www.statista.com/topics/4748/smart-speakers/#topicOverview
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60229-4
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewe, P. L. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Vraga, E., & Ekdale, B. (2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication & Society, 13(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903225571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Strien, J. L. H., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2014). Dealing with conflicting information from multiple nonlinear texts: Effects of prior attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Strien, J. L., Kammerer, Y., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior, 100(60), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.057
   Google Scholar
• Voicebot. (2019, March 7). U.S. Smart speaker ownership rises 40% in 2018 to 66.4 million and Amazon Echo maintains market share lead says new report from voicebot. https://voicebot.ai/2019/03/07/u-s-smart-speaker-ownership-rises-40-in-2018-to-66-4-million-and-amazon-echo-maintains-market-share-lead-says-new-report-from-voicebot/
   Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H. J., Miao, L., Kuo, P. J., & Lee, B. Y. (2011). Consumers’ responses to ambivalent online hotel reviews: The role of perceived source credibility and pre-decisional disposition. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(1), 178–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. J., Aloe, A., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Risk information seeking and processing model. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Forney, J. C. (2013). The moderating role of consumer technology anxiety in mobile shopping adoption. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(4), 334–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar