Damn Their Media, Damn the Other Side: Direct and Indirect Effects of Relative Hostile Media Perception on Affective Polarization

References

• Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Murphy, C. (2012). Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002238161100123x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2014). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and political talk: Expanding the corrective action hypothesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P., Thorson, K., & Hwang, H. (2015). Causes and consequences of selective exposure among political blog readers: The role of hostile media perception in motivated media use and expressive participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1008608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenan, M. (2023, October 19). Media confidence in U.S. matches 2016 record low. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/512861/media-confidence-matches-2016-record-low.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Ahmed, S., Keum, H., Choi, Y. J., & Lee, J. H. (2018). Influencing myself: Self-reinforcement through online political expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Park, H. S., & Chang, J. J. (2011). Hostile media perception, involvement types, and advocacy behaviors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, N., & Lelkes, Y. (2021). The nature of affective polarization: Disentangling policy disagreement from partisan identity. American Journal of Political Science, 66(3), 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir-Gvirsman, S., Tsfati, Y., & Menchen-Trevino, E. (2016). The extent and nature of ideological selective exposure online: Combining survey responses with actual web log data from the 2013 Israeli Elections. New Media & Society, 18(5), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814549041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33(3), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro-and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearhart, S., Moe, A., & Zhang, B. (2020). Hostile media bias on social media: Testing the effect of user comments on perceptions of news bias and credibility. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.185
   Google Scholar
• Guess, A. M. (2021). (Almost) everything in moderation: New evidence on Americans’ online media diets. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., McLaughlin, B., Gotlieb, M. R., & Wise, D. (2017). Who says what to whom: Content versus source in the hostile media effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2017). Ten years after comparing media systems: What have we learned? Political Communication, 34(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., Feldman, L., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2015). Extending the impacts of hostile media perceptions: Influences on discussion and opinion polarization in the context of climate change. Science Communication, 37(4), 506–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015592067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). The PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS (version 2.13) [Software].
   Google Scholar
• Heatherly, K. A., Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2017). Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1271–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Staggs, S., Hutchens, M. J., & Beam, M. A. (2020). Talking politics: The relationship between supportive and opposing discussion with partisan media credibility and use. Communication Research, 49(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220915041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchens, M. J., Hmielowski, J. D., & Beam, M. A. (2019). Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1575255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Pan, Z., & Sun, Y. (2008). Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701813454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzchakov, G., Weinstein, N., Leary, M., Saluk, D., & Amar, M. (2023). Listening to understand: The role of high-quality listening on speakers’ attitude depolarization during disagreements. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 126(2), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Grabe, M. E. (2020). The influence of news brand cues and story content on citizen perceptions of news bias. The International Journal of Press/politics, 27(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220963580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2024). How affective polarization deepens the partisan divide in US cable news use: Exploring the mediating role of partisans’ bias blind spots in media credibility judgment. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, & Applications. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000414
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. S., Lee, S. S., Liang, F., Kim, D. H., Shen, L., Weeks, B. E., & Kwak, N. (2019). Social media expression and the political self. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. (2013). Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication, 30(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2019). Partisan information sources and affective polarization: Panel analysis of the mediating role of anger and fear. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018811295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 866–887. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2013). The affective underpinnings of hostile media perceptions: Exploring the distinct effects of affective and cognitive involvement. Communication Research, 40(3), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211420255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research, 47(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. C., & Coronel, J. C. (2022). Interpersonal discussion and political knowledge: Unpacking the black box via a combined experimental and content-analytic approach. Human Communication Research, 48(2), 230–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., & Fletcher, R. (2017). Bias, bullshit and lies: Audience perspectives on low trust in the media. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/Nic%20Newman%20and%20Richard%20Fletcher%20-%20Bias%2C%20Bullshit%20and%20Lies%20-%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/Digital_News_Report_2021_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, M. (2021). Is the age of impartial journalism over? The neutrality principle and audience (dis) trust in mainstream news. Journalism Studies, 22(15), 2042–2060. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1942150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M., & Shen, L. (2023). The third-person effect 40 years after Davison penned it: What we know and where we should traverse. Mass Communication & Society, 26(3), 384–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2134802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. (2019). Democracy without journalism?: Confronting the misinformation society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pingree, R. J. (2007). How messages affect their senders: A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation. Communication Theory, 17(4), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory, 16(1), 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E., & Van Deth, J. W. (2014). Supporting democracy: Political participation and political attitudes. Exploring causality using panel data. Political Studies, 62(1_suppl), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, S. A. (2012). A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01647.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2010). “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmierbach, M., Andsager, J., Banning, S., Chung, M., Lyons, B., McLeod, D. M., Meirick, P. C., Pan, Z., Rojas, H., & Sun, Y. (2023). Another point of view: Scholarly responses to the state of third-person research. Mass Communication & Society, 26(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2193512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (2018). Why journalism still matters. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. W., & Friedland, L. A. (2017). Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebers, V., Gradus, R., & Grotens, R. (2019). Citizen engagement and trust: A study among citizen panel members in three Dutch municipalities. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Vliegenthart, R., & Lindholm, T. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., & Lee, J. K. (2013). Perceptions of cable news credibility. Mass Communication & Society, 16(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.646449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., Muddiman, A., & Lee, J. K. (2014). Seeing media as group members: An evaluation of partisan bias perceptions. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 874–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sude, D. J., Pearson, G. D., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2021). Self-expression just a click away: Source interactivity impacts on confirmation bias and political attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2017, April 5). Six in 10 in U.S. see partisan bias in news media. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/207794/six-partisan-bias-news-media.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00043-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, C., Gill, H., Li, J., Valenzuela, S., & Rojas, H. (2020). “Fake news is anything they say!”—Conceptualization and weaponization of fake news among the American public. Mass Communication & Society, 23(5), 755–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1789661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, S. J., & Rojas, H. (2020). Opinion leaders, perceived media hostility and political participation. Communication Studies, 71(5), 753–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1791203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2012). Perceptions of media and media effects: The third person effect, trust in media and hostile media perceptions. The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems995
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Nir, L. (2017). Frames and reasoning: Two pathways from selective exposure to affective polarization. International Journal of Communication, 11, 22. https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1932-8036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). Understanding self-effects in social media. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49(3), 577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Lang, A. (2012). Reconceptualizing excitation transfer as motivational activation changes and a test of the television program context effects. Media Psychology, 15(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.649604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., de Leeuw, S., Menchen-Trevino, E., Lee, S., Huang-Isherwood, K. M., & Weeks, B. (2021). No polarization from partisan news: Over-time evidence from trace data. The International Journal of Press/politics, 28(3), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211047194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Garrett, R. K. (2018). Social identity, selective exposure, and affective polarization: How priming national identity shapes attitudes toward immigrants via news selection. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqx010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., & Lu, Y. (2021). News consumption and affective polarization in Taiwan: The mediating roles of like-minded discussion and relative hostile media perception. The Social Science Journal, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1933877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., Lu, Y., Lee, J. K., & Choi, J. (2024). Social media news use and polarized partisan perceptions: Mediating roles of like-minded and cross-cutting discussion. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2024.2317388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar