Automatic Identification of Character Types from Film Dialogs

References

• Agarwal, A., et al. 2014. Using determinantal point processes for clustering with application to automatically generating and drawing xkcd movie narrative charts USA: Academy of Science and Engineering (ASE).
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., J. Zheng, S. V. Kamath, S. Balasubramanian, and S. A. Dey. 2015. Key female characters in film have more to talk about besides men: Automating the bechdel test. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Denver, Colorado, USA, 830–40.
   Google Scholar
• Alberich, R., J. Miro-Julia, and F. Rossellό. 2002. Marvel Universe looks almost like a real social network. Arxiv Preprint.
   Google Scholar
• Bamman, D., B. O’Connor, and N. A. Smith. 2014. Learning latent personas of film characters. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 352.
   Google Scholar
• Bamman, D., T. Underwood, and N. A. Smith. 2014. A bayesian mixed effects model of literary character. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), (1):370–79.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, M. A. 1965. An improved index of centrality. Behavioral Science 10 (2):161–3. doi:10.1002/bs.3830100205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bednarek, M. 2010. The language of fictional television: Drama and identity. New York, USA: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, T. 2013. Killing the writer: Movie dialogue conventions and John Cassavetes. In Film dialogue, ed. J. Jaeckle, 103–15. London/New York: Wallflower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D. 2007. Poetics of cinema. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cormen, T. H., et al. 2001. Introduction to algorithms. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN: 0070131511.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, J., M. Short, and P. Verdonk. 1998. Exploring the language of drama. From text to context. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., and L. Lee. 2011. Chameleons in imagined conversation: A new approach to understanding coordination of linguistic style in dialogs. Conference Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E. W. 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1 (1):269–71. ISSN: 0945-3245. doi:10.1007/BF01386390.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, J. 2014. Die Figur im Film, 2nd ed. Marburg: Schueren.
   Google Scholar
• Field, S. 2005. Screenplay. The foundations of screenwriting. New York: Bantam Dell.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40:35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Gleiser, P. M. 2007. How to become a superhero. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007 (09):P09020. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2007/09/P09020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorinski, P. J., and M. Lapata. 2015. Movie script summarization as graph-based scene extraction. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics – Human Language Technologies (NAACL HLT 2015), Denver, Colorado, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gretton, A., et al. 2005. “Measuring statistical dependence with Hilbert-Schmidt norms”. In: Algorithmic learning theory, 63–77. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Karsdorp, F., et al. 2015. The love equation: Computational modeling of romantic relationships in french classical drama. Sixth International Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative, Atlanta, GA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, T. D. 1990. Social relations and emotions: A structural approach. In Research agendas in the sociology of emotions, ed. T. D. Kemper, 207–36. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiros, R., et al. 2015. Skip-thought vectors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3276–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kolaczyk, E. D., and G. Cs´Ardi. 2014. Statistical analysis of network data with R. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kozloff, S. 2000. Overhearing film dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchenbuch, T. 2005. Filmanalyse. Theorien, Methoden, Kritik. Wien, Koeln, Weimar: Boehlau.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu, A., D. Das, and S. Bandyopadhyay. 2013. Scene boundary detection from movie dialogue: A genetic algorithm approach. Polibits 47:55–60. doi:10.17562/PB-47-6.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. 1991. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and S. Marsella. 2011. Modeling side participants and bystanders: The importance of being a laugh track. In IVA, eds. H.H. Vilhjálmsson, S. Kopp, S. Marsella, and K.R. Thórisson, 240–7. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, P. G., M. C. González, and H. J. Herrmann. 2005. Cycles and clustering in bipartite networks. Physical Review E 72 (5):056127. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.72.056127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Carron, P., and R. Kenna. 2012. Universal properties of mythological networks. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 99 (2):28002. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/99/28002.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., et al. 2014. Information network or social network?: The structure of the twitter follow graph. Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World wide web companion. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 493–8. Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Otte, E., and R. Rousseau. 2002. Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science 28 (6):441–53. doi:10.1177/016555150202800601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payr, S. 2007. So Let’s See: Taking and Keeping the Initiative in Collaborative Dialogues. In Intelligent Virtual Agents. Proc. IVA’07, Paris, eds. C. Pelachaud, et al., 175–82. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Payr, S. 2013. Virtual butlers and real people: Styles and practices in long-term use of a companion. In Virtual butlers: The making of, ed. R. Trappl. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peberdy, D. 2013. Male sounds and speech affectations: Voicing masculinity. In Film dialogue, ed. J. Jaeckle, 206–20. London/New York: Wallflower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., M. E. Francis, and R. J. Booth. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 71:2001.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakaran, V., and O. Rambow. 2013. Written dialog and social power: Manifes tations of different types of power in dialog behavior. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP), Nagoya, Japan, October.
   Google Scholar
• Price, S. 2013. A history of the screenplay. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Quaglio, P. 2009. Television dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., et al. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the english language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. 2010. Multimodality and the study of popular drama. Language and Literature 19 (4):378–95. doi:10.1177/0963947010377948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saramäki, J., et al. 2007. Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. Physical Review E 75 (2):027105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.027105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y. K. 2011. Identifying power relationships in dialogues. Thesis, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Suen, C., L. Kuenzel, and S. Gil. 2013. Extraction and analysis of character interaction networks from plays and movies. Proc. Digital Humanities 2013, Lincoln, NE, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Taavitsainen, I. 1999. Writing in Nonstandard English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tieber, C. 2008. Schreiben fuer Hollywood. Das Drehbuch im Studiosystem. Vienna: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Trappl, R., et al. 2011. Robots as Companions: What can we learn from servants and companions in literature, theater, and film? Proc. European Future Technologies Conference 2011 (FET11), 96–8.
   Google Scholar
• Traum, D. 2003. Issues in multiparty dialogues. In Advances in agent communication, 201–11. Frank Dignum: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Truby, J. 2007. The anatomy of story: 22 steps to becoming a master storyteller. London, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Turetsky, R., and N. Dimitrova. 2004. Screenplay alignment for closed-system speaker identification and analysis of feature films. Proceedings ICME’04, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 1659–62, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V. 2013. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer-Verlag New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, C. 2007. The Writer’s journey. Mythic structures for writers, 3rd ed. Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. A., et al. 2011. Murder in the Arboretum: Comparing character models to personality models. In Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Intelligent Narrative Technologies, AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. A., G. I. Lin, and J. Sawyer. 2012. An annotated corpus of film dialogue for learning and characterizing character style. LREC, 1373–8.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393 (6684):440–2. doi:10.1038/30918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, C.-Y., W.-T. Chu, and J.-L. Wu. 2009. RoleNet: Movie analysis from the perspective of social networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 11 (2):256–71. doi:10.1109/TMM.2008.2009684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. L., A. Baddeley, and R. A. Owens. 1995. A new metric for grey- scale image comparison. International Journal of Computer Vision 24:24–1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., et al. 2015. Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading books. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 19–27, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar