Why Not Robot Teachers: Artificial Intelligence for Addressing Teacher Shortage

References

• Abdullah, N. N. B., and S. A. Cerri. 2005. Analysis and synthesis of learning agent’s communicative behavior. Applied Artificial Intelligence 19:1015–41. doi:10.1080/08839510500304116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aimeur, E., C. Frasson, and H. Dufort. 2000. Cooperative learning strategies for intelligent tutoring systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence 14 (5):465–89. doi:10.1080/088395100403388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragon, Stephanie. 2016. “Teacher Shortages: What We Know.” 1. Teacher Shortage Series. Denver, CO 80203. http://www.ecs.org/ec-content/uploads/Teacher-Shortages-What-We-Know.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., C. Harms, and J. Gregg; Media Interface, and Network Design M I N D Labs. 2001. The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity co-presence. East 21 (January 2001):9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, G., K. Leelawong, D. Schwartz, and N. Vye, and The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt. 2005, January. Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence 19 (30):363–92. doi:10.1080/08839510590910200.
   Google Scholar
• Blututors. 2016. Artificial intelligence – Will smart computers replace teachers? BlueTutors. https://bluetutors.co.uk/tuition-articles/2016/dec/bluetutors-articles/artificial-intelligence-will-smart-computers-replace-teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, J. A. 2006. Human-robot relationships: The future of full-functionality. Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of California. Riverside: Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Brill, J. M., and C. B. Hodges. 2010. Investigating peer review as an intentional learning strategy to foster collaborative knowledge-building in students of instructional design. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 23 (1):114–18. International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning. Web site: http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe:.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijnes, M. 2012. Social and emotional turn taking for embodied conversational agents. Proceedings - 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, SocialCom/PASSAT 2012, 977–78. doi:10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.29.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, K.-Y., C.-H. Wu, and Z.-W. Hong. 2011. A humanoid robot as a teaching assistant for primary education. 2011 Fifth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing, 21–24. doi:10.1109/ICGEC.2011.13.
   Google Scholar
• Cobbold, C. 2015. Solving the teacher shortage problem in Ghana : Critical perspectives for understanding the issues. Journal of Education and Practice 6 (9):71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, F. 2016. Teacher shortage areas nationwide listing 1990–1991 through 2016–2017. Department of Education, United States of America. doi:10.1177/1362168812455588.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, T., and M. Boulos. 2013. Robots in health and social care: A complementary technology to home care and telehealthcare? Robotics 3 (1):1–21. doi:10.3390/robotics3010001.
   Google Scholar
• Demirjian, H. 2015, March. Teacher shortage in the Arab World : Policy implications. Research Paper. Doha, Qatar: Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, M., J. Masthoff, and C. Mellish. 2016. Adapting progress feedback and emotional support to learner personality. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26 (3):877–931. doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0059-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diprose, W., and N. Buist. 2016. Artificial intelligence in medicine: Humans need not apply? New Zealand Medical Journal 129 (1434):73–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, W. 2008. An electronic response system and conceptests in general chemistry courses. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 27 (4):369–89.
   Google Scholar
• Flynt, S., and R. C. Morton. 2009. The teacher shortage in America: Pressing concerns. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal 19 (3):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, A. 2007. The use of contract teachers in developing countries: Trends and impact. Geneva: Sectoral Activities Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, K., J. Salvatier, A. Dafoe, B. Zhang, and O. Evans. 2017. When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1705.08807.
   Google Scholar
• Gulshan, V., L. Peng, M. C. Marc Coram, D. W. Stumpe, A. Narayanaswamy, S. Venugopalan, et al. 2016. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 304 (6):649–56. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, B, and M Procter. 2012. “Embodied and Embedded Intelligence: Actor Agents on Virtual Stages.” In Intelligent and Adaptive Learning Systems: Technology-Enhanced Support for Learners and Teachers, edited by Sabine Graf, Fuhua Lin, Kinshuk, and Rory McGreal. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-60960-842-2.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Authority (HEA). 2016. “Key Facts and Figures.” Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 DO4 C2Y6. http://hea.ie/assets/uploads/2017/06/HEA-Key-Facts-and-Figures-201516.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holler, J., K. H. Kendrick, M. Casillas, and S. C. Levinson. 2015. Editorial: Turn-taking in human communicative interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, L. F. 2012. Addressing the STEM teacher shortage in American schools: Ways to recruit and retain effective STEM teachers. Action in Teacher Education 34 (5–6):541–50. doi:10.1080/01626620.2012.729483.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., and H. May. 2011. The minority teacher shortage: Fact or fable ? Kappan Magazine 93 (1):62–65. doi:10.1177/003172171109300111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iver, Mac, Martha Abele, and J. Douglas. 2014. “‘ STEMming’ the Swell of Absenteeism in Urban Middle Grade Schools: Impacts of a Summer Robotics Program.” In Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE), 6-8 September. Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A., K. Jordine, and D.-M. Wilson. 2011. Using embodied pedagogical agents and direct instruction to augment learning for young children with special needs. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. L., and Lester, J. C. 2016. Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. International Journal Artificial Intelligent Education 26:25–36. doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0065-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristi Mussman. 2016. “Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools: U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools.” Prior Lake-Savage Area: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Y. Lee, B. Kye, and B. Ko. 2008. Elementary and middle school teachers ’, students ’ and parents ’ perception of robot-aided education in Korea. Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2008, 175–83. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, E., Z. Feng, C. H. Lin, P. Y. Liou, H. C. Feng, and H. T. Hou. 2013. An analysis of teacher-student interaction patterns in a robotics course for kindergarten children: A pilot study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 12 (1):9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Malkus, Nat, Kathleen Mulvaney Hoyer, and Dinah Sparks. 2015. “Teaching Vacancies and Difficult-to-Staff Teaching Positions in Public Schools (NCES 2015-065),” no. November:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Maney, K. 2016. How artificial intelligence and robots will radically transform the economy. Newsweek: Tech & Science, November.
   Google Scholar
• Manyika, J., M. Chui, M. Miremadi, J. Bughin, K. George, P. Willmott, and M. Dewhurst. 2017. A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity. New York: McKinsey Global Institute, no. January, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, W., and G. M. Rezai-Rashti. 2010. Male teacher shortage: Black teachers’ perspectives. Gender & Education 22 (3):247–62. doi:10.1080/09540250903474582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. 1997. Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class. AIP Conference Proceedings, Cambridge, vol. 399, 981–88. AIP. doi:10.1063/1.53199.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, E., and J. Watkins. 2010. Justing-in-time teching and peer instruction. In Just in time teaching: Across the disciplines, and across the academy (New pedagogies and practices for teaching in higher education), eds. S. Simkins, and M. Maier, 39–62. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mcconnell, D. A., D. N. Steer, K. D. Owens, J. R. Knott, J. Dick, and P. J. Heaney. 2006. Using conceptests to assess and improve student conceptual understanding in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education 54:61–68. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-54.1.61.
   Google Scholar
• Mcewan, P. J. 1999. Recruitment of rural teachers in developing countries: An economic analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education 15:849–59. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00025-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michinov, N., J. Morice, and F. Vincent. 2015. A step further in peer instruction: Using the stepladder technique to improve learning. Computers & Education 91:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2016. Mastering the game of go - How did a computer program beat a human champion??? Alberta: Faculty of Science, University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Nebeska, I. 2005. On the norms of communication. Prague: Charles University.
   Google Scholar
• Osaka University. 2015. Development of social dialogue robots ‘commu’ and ‘sota’. Research at Osaka University. http://resou.osaka-u.ac.jp/en/research/2015/20150120_2.
   Google Scholar
• Payr, S. 2005. Not quite an editorial: Educational agents and (E-)learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence 19 (3–4):199–213. doi:10.1080/08839510590910147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, A., C. Martinho, I. Leite, and A. Paiva. 2008. iCat, the chess player: The influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game. In Proceedings of 7th International Joint Conference on AAMAS, May 12 - 16, edited by Padgham, Parkes, Müller, and Parsons, 1253–56. Estoril, Portugal: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, A., R. Prada, and A. Paiva. 2014. Improving social presence in human-agent interaction. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1449–58. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557180.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. 2014. Robot teachers in the classroom. iQ. https://iq.intel.com/robot-teachers-in-the-classroom/.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. 2015. Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? British Educational Research Association Blog, September. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Provasnik, Stephen, Angelina KewalRamani, Mary McLaughlin Coleman, Lauren Gilbertson, Will Herring, and Qingshu Xie. 2007. “Status of Education in Rural America.” Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. K. 2003. Executive summary. In Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes, Vol. v-7. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. doi:10.1136/ip.8.suppl_1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H., B. MacDonald, N. Kerse, and E. Broadbent. 2013. The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 14 (9):661–67. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, N., G. Baltus, D. Fox, F. Gemperle, J. Goetz, T. Hirsch, D. Margaritis, et al. 2000. Towards personal service robots for the elderly. Workshop on Interactive Robots and Entertainment (WIRE 2000) (2000) 25 (2000):184. doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0232-4.
   Google Scholar
• Saltinski, R., and D. Ph. 2015. Accelerating technologies: Consequences for the future wellbeing of students. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies 17:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, A. J. C. 2016. Should we welcome robot teachers? Ethics and Information Technology 18:283–97. doi:10.1007/s10676-016-9387-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberg, G., and R. Wallace. 2012. Self-driving cars: The next revolution. Center for Automotive Research 36. Delaware: KPMG Group.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., W. B. Wood, W. K. Adams, C. Wieman, J. K. Knight, N. Guild, and T. T. Su. 2009. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science (New York, N.Y.) 323 (5910):122–24. doi:10.1126/science.1165919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, I. 2016. ‘It looks like a human!’ The interrelation of social presence, interaction and agency ascription: A case study about the effects of an android robot on social agency ascription. AI and Society 31 (4):Springer London: 553–71. doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0632-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegos, S., S. Demetriadis, and T. Tsiatsos. 2014. A configurable conversational agent to trigger students’ productive dialogue: A pilot study in the CALL domain. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 24 (1):62–91. doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0007-3.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2015. “The Challenge of Teacher Shortage and Quality: Have We Succeeded in Getting Enough Quality Teachers into Classrooms?” In 12th Session of the Joint ILO/UNESCO Committee of Experts on the Application of the Recommendations Concerning Teaching Personnel (CEART), Paris (April 2015), 1–9. Paris: GMR and UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• You, Z.-J., C.-Y. Shen, C.-W. Chang, B.-J. Liu, and G.-D. Chen. 2006. A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. Advanced Learning Technologies, 2006. Sixth International Conference on, 87–91. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652373.
   Google Scholar