Predictive Analytics Machinery for STEM Student Success Studies

References

• Alkhasawneh, R., and R. Hobson (2009). Summer transition program: A model for impacting first-year retention rates for underrepresented groups. Paper presented at the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhasawneh, R., and R. Hobson (2011). Modeling student retention in science and engineering disciplines using neural networks. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2011 IEEE, 660–63. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ameri, S., M. J. Fard, R. B. Chinnam, and C. K. Reddy (2016, October). Survival analysis based framework for early prediction of student dropouts. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 903–12. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, H. P., and W. D. Davidson. 2001. Establishing an early warning system: Predicting low grades in college students from survey of academic orientations scores. Research in High Education 42(6):709–23. doi:10.1023/A:1012253527960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beemer, J., K. Spoon, L. He, J. Fan, and R. A. Levine. 2017. Ensemble learning for estimating individualized treatment effects in student success studies. To appear in . International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. doi:10.1007/s40593-017-0148-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P. 2012. Identifying and nurturing future innovators in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: A review of findings from the study of mathematically precocious youth. Peabody Journal of Education 87(1):16–25. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2012.642236.
   Google Scholar
• Besterfield-Sacre, M., C. Atman, and L. Shuman. 1997. Characteristics of freshmen engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 86(2):139–49. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 2001. Random Forest. Machine Learning 45:5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (2002). Manual on setting up, using, and understanding random forests. Technical Report, V3.1. http://oz.berkeley.edu/users/breiman.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. I. Stone. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. L., G. Halpin, and G. Halpin. 2015. Relationship between high school mathematical achievement and quantitative GPA. Higher Education Studies 5(6):1–8. doi:10.5539/hes.v5n6p1.
   Google Scholar
• Burtner, J. 2005. The use of discriminant analysis to investigate the influence of non-cognitive factors on engineering school persistence. Journal of Engineering Education 94(3):335. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00858.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buuren, S. V., and K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn (1999). Flexible multivariate imputation by MICE. Technical report. Leiden, The Netherlands: TNO prevention and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Buuren, S. V., and K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn. 2011. MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations. Journal of Statistical Software 45: doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A., N. Smith, and M. Melton. 2011. STEM: Science, Technology. Georgetown University, Engineering and Mathematics. In Center on Education and the Workforce, Washington, DC. https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/stem-complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caruana, R., N. Karampatziakis, and A. Yessenalina (2008). An empirical evaluation of supervised learning in high dimensions, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning 2008, 96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Caruana, R., and A. Niculescu-Mizil (2006). An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning 2006, 161–68.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W. and Ribeiro, B. B. (2018). shinydashboard. R package version 0.7.0. CRAN. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/shinydashboard/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, N. V., K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16:321–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., and M. Soldner (2013). STEM attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM fields. Statistical Analysis Report. Report NCES 2014, US Dept. of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., and T. Weko. 2009. Students Who Study Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Postsecondary Education. . Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, S. 2000. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 19(22):3127–31. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dika, S. L., and M. M. D’Amico. 2016. Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53(3):368–83. doi:10.1002/tea.21301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, J. L. 2008. The use of formative online quizzes to enhance class preparation and scores on summative exams. Advances in Physiology Education 32(4):297–302. doi:10.1152/advan.90162.2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., S. E. Brownell, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology Classrooms. CBE-Life Sciences Education 13(3):478–92. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G. 2010. Analyzing the factors that influence persistence rates in STEM fields majors: Introduction to the symposium. Economics of Education Review 29:888–91. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feelders, A. 1999. Handling missing data in trees: Surrogate splits or statistical imputation? Zytkow and Rauch 255:329–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Delgado, M., E. Cernadas, S. Barro, and D. Amorim. 2014. Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? Journal of Machine Learning Research 15:3133–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., S. Ledbetter, D. Williams, and J. McCain. (2008). Engineering students define diversity: An uncommon thread. In 2008 ASEE Conference and Exposition.
   Google Scholar
• Genuer, R., V. Michel, E. Eger, and B. Thirion. 2010. Random forests based feature selection for decoding fMRI data. Proceedings Compstat 2010, August 2227, Paris, France 267:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Griff, E. R., and S. F. Matter. 2008. Early identification of at-risk students using a personal response system. British Journal of Educational Technology 39(6):1124–30. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00806.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haag, S., and J. Collofello (2008). Engineering undergraduate persistence and contributing factors. ASEE/IEEE Annual Fronters in Educaton Conference (38th), Saratoga Springs, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. 2006. Estimating student retention and degree-completion time: Decision trees and neural networks vis-a-vis regression. New Directions for Institutional Research (131):17–33. doi:10.1002/ir.185.
   Google Scholar
• James, G., D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kassaee, A., and G. H. Rowell (2016). Using digital metaphors to improve student success in mathematics and science. In 10th Annual TN STEM Education Research Conference February 11- 12, 2016 DoubleTree Hotel Murfreesboro, TN (p. 48).
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, J. E. 2015. Of needles and haystacks: Building an accurate statewide dropout early warning system in Wisconsin. Journal of Educational Data Mining 7(3):18–67.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., J. Maerten-Rivera, R. D. Penfield, K. LeRoy, and W. G. Secada. 2008. Science achievement of english language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(1):31–52. doi:10.1002/tea.20209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, U. J., G. C. Sbeglia, M. Ha, S. J. Finch, and R. H. Nehm. 2015. Clicker score trajectories and concept inventory scores as predictors for early warning systems for large STEM classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology 24(6):848–60. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9568-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. J., P. K. Imbrie, and K. J. Reid. 2009. Student Retention Modelling: An evaluation of different methods and their impact on prediction results. In Research in Engineering Education Sysmposium, 1–6. Palm Cove, Australia: Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN).
   Google Scholar
• Louppe, G. (2014). Understanding random forests: From theory to practice. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.7502.
   Google Scholar
• Macfadyen, L. P., and S. Dawson. 2010. Mining LMS Data to Develop an “early warning system” for Educators: A proof of concept. Computers and Education 54(2):588–99. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, G., T. D. Buskirk, S. Lohr, and S. Haag. 2008. Factors associated with persistence in science and engineering majors: An exploratory study using classification trees and random forests. Journal of Engineering Education 97(1):57–70. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00954.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. L., and A. Daniel. 2007. A Year-long Entry-level College Course Sequence for Enhancing Engineering Student Success. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE), Coimbra, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Murtaugh, P. A., L. D. Burns, and J. Schuster. 1999. Predicting the retention of university students. Research in Higher Education 40(3):355–71. doi:10.1023/A:1018755201899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, M. N., E. Chacko, R. Penny, and M. MonirHossain. 2003. Multivariate nearest neighbour imputation. Journal of Statistics in Transition 6:55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Neild, R. C., R. Balfanz, and L. Herzog. 2007. An early warning system. Educational Leadership 65(2):28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2012. Education At a Glance 2012: OECD indicators. Washington, D. C: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, R., and S. Foster. 2013. Increasing student success using online quizzing in introductory (majors) Biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education 12(3):509–14. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-10-0183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCAST. 2012. Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: PCAST.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E., L. Woessmann, E. A. Hanushek, and C. X. Lastra-Anadón (2011). Globally challenged: Are US students ready to compete? The latest on each state’s international standing in math and reading. PEPG 11-03. Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language for Statistical Computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. A., M. B. Bailey, J. Hamann, L. K. Pendleton, R. Reisberg, and D. L. Whitman. 2015. The role of work experience and self-efficacy in STEM student retention. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 26(4):29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rath, K. A., A. R. Peterfreund, S. P. Xenos, F. Bayliss, and N. Carnal. 2007. Supplemental Instruction in Introductory Biology I: Enhancing the performance and retention of underrepresented minority students. CBE-Life Sciences Education 6(3):203–16. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-10-0198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Redmond-Sanogo, A., J. Angle, and E. Davis. 2016. Kinks in the STEM Pipeline: Tracking STEM graduation rates using science and mathematics performance. School Science and Mathematics 116(7):378–88. doi:10.1111/ssm.2016.116.issue-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., C. Abraham, and R. Bond. 2012. Psychological correlates of university students? academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 138(2):353–87. doi:10.1037/a0026838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. 2002. Observational Studies (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., and R. H. Tai. 2007. The two high pillars supporting college science. Science 317(5837):457–58. doi:10.1126/science.1144214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., and J. W. Graham. 2002. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods 7:147–77. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens, G., and P. Long. 2011. Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review 46(5):30.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. A., M. W. Aulls, H. Dedic, K. Hubbard, and N. C. Hall. 2015. Exploring Student Persistence in STEM Programs: A motivational model. Canadian Journal of Education 38(1):1. doi:10.2307/canajeducrevucan.38.2.13.
   Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., A. L. Boulesteix, T. Kneib, T. Augustin, and A. Zeileis. 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forest. BMC Bioinformatics 9:307. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., A. L. Boulesteix, A. Zeileis, and T. Hothorn. 2007. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, R. H., P. M. Sadler, and J. J. Mintzes. 2006. Factors influencing college science success. Journal of College Science Teaching 35(8):56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, T., S. Peterman, and M. Brown. 2008. Addressing the crisis in college mathematics: Designing courses for student success. Change: the Magazine of Higher Learning 40(4): 44–49. 12. doi:10.3200/CHNG.40.4.44-49.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. D., B. V. Bowling, and R. E. Markle. 2018. Predicting student success in a major’s introductory biology course via logistic regression analysis of scientific reasoning ability and mathematics scores. Research in Science Education 48:151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, J. E., M. A. Reyes, and M. R. Anderson-Rowland (2002). Minority engineering program computer basics with a vision. In Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual (Vol. 3, pp. S3C-S3C). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. F., and M. C. Shelley II. 2010. Academic Success for STEM and Non-STEM majors. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 11(1/2):45.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., and S. Shrock (2001). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. SIGCSE Bulletin: The proceedings of the Thirty-Second SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 33, 184–88.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Q. Fei, M. Quddus, and C. Davis. 2014. An examination of the impact of early intervention on learning outcomes of at-risk students. Research in Higher Education Journal 26:1.
   Google Scholar