Human Judges in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities

References

• Barrat, J. 2015. Our final invention: Artificial intelligence and the end of the human era. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Calo., R., A. M. Froomkin., and I. Kerr. 2016. Robot law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cardozo., B. N. 2012. The nature of the judicial process. Dover Publications Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen., M., and H. Xiao (2017). The Provincial Higher People’s Court held a symposium on the review of standardized sentencing intelligent auxiliary systems. Hainan Legal Times, published on 2017- 12-8.
   Google Scholar
• Crootof, R. 2019. Cyborg justice and the risk of technological-legal lock-in. Columbia Law Review Forum 119 (20):233–1045.
   Google Scholar
• Dommel, L. 2016. The era of algorithms: The new engine of the new economy. Translated by X. R. Hu, et al. New York: CITIC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 2002. The empire of law. Translated by Li. G.Y. Taipei: Shiying Publishing (Taipei).
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. J. 2019. Opportunities, challenges and development paths of judicial intelligence in China in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (3):115–23. https://t.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKibYlV5Vjs7iLik5jEcCI09uHa3oBxtWoCltvs5AUkXkrsiI4UeryZI6juiT52TdikacmrOxiN20&uniplatform=NZKPT
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X. Q. 2019. Chinese justice in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 49 (4):229–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner., A. (1984). An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning. Stanford University, Thesis (Ph. D.), The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, R. 2006. The inner world of jurors-Psychoanalysis of the jury’s adjudication process. Translated by L.W& L.H. Beijing: Peking University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, O. W. 1963. The common law, 2005. Digireads com.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes.O.W. 2009. The Common Law. Chicago: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Honorê., T. 1996. About law: An introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. 2008. what can information technology do for law? Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 21 (2):589–607.
   Google Scholar
• Katsh, E. 1995. Law in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz., D. M., M. J. Bommarito., J. Blackman., and L. A. N. Amaral. 2017. A general approach for predicting the behavior of the supreme court of the United States. PLoS ONE 12 (4):1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. N. 2020. Trustworthy artificial intelligence judicature: Significance, challenges and governance responses. Law Forum 35 (4):116–26.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z. 2017. Artificial intelligence enters the court to “judge cases.” Economic Daily. No. 2017- 7-14.
   Google Scholar
• Li., X. M. 2020. Judicial big data and legal artificial intelligence’s tendency to public power and its response. Journal of Soochow University (Law Edition) 7(4):2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, C. S. 2020. Reshaping effect of judicial ARTIFICIAL intelligence and its limits. Legal Research 42 (4):23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mariusz, Z. (2020). Evidentiary function of the provisions on the form of wills in the contemporary succession law: Is the complete abandonment of formalism possible? Trusts & Trustees, ttaa080, Published: 04 October 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo, Y. 2016. Artificial intelligence Mania: Will robots surpass humans? H. B. Gao., and H. H. Zhao., Translated by. Beijing: China Machine Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayson., S. 2019. Bias in, Bias Out. Yale Law Journal 128(8) ():2218–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D. G. 1999. Social Psychology. Mcgraw-Hill College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, L. Y. 2017. The value and orientation of artificial intelligence intervention in the judicial field. Exploration and Contention (10):101–06. https://t.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKibYlV5Vjs7iAEhECQAQ9aTiC5BjCgn0RgMMPPJdcytd--LzJi-a06N5Q516PTHmaFOBo49hG9rP&uniplatform=NZKPT
   Google Scholar
• Radbruch, G. 1997. Introduction to law. ed. J. Mi., and L. Zhu. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, X. J. 2020. On the role of judges in reducing the crux of the same case with different judgments. Jiangsu Social Sciences 4:112–20.
   Google Scholar
• Slobogin, C. 2012. Risk Assessment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X. G. 2020. On the artificial intelligence of judicial adjudication and its limits. Comparative Law Research (5):80–92. https://t.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKibYlV5Vjs7i8oRR1PAr7RxjuAJk4dHXonunbTUQ14lpe_qmOZZFnH0-7VxMSApqqW_O0gWYzSnv&uniplatform=NZKPT
   Google Scholar
• Stanila.L.2020. Living in the Future: New Actors in the Field of Criminal Law- Artificial Intelligence. The 7th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia, 300–312.
   Google Scholar
• Surden, H. 2019. Artificial intelligence and law: An overview. Georgia State University Law Review 35:19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky., A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series 185 (4157):1124–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volokh, E. 2019. Chief Justice Robots. Duke Law Journal 68(6):1134–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. S. 2019. Risk and ethical regulation of judicial big data and application of ARTIFICIAL intelligence technology. Research of Law and Business 36(2):101–12.
   Google Scholar
• Weber., M. 2010. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xie., S. 2020. How ARTIFICIAL intelligence can help criminal justice “without bias” – From “evidence guidance” to “evidence assistance.” Law Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law) 38(5):109–19.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L. P. (2017). Practice and think about the construction of smart courts. People’s Court News(China), published on October 25.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. Q. 2020. The application of artificial intelligence in trials. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 49(1):102–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng., X. 2020. Application and regulation of artificial intelligence technology in judicial judgment. Chinese and Foreign Law 32 (3):675–96.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, S. J., and Q. Wu. 2019. The possibility and limit of artificial intelligence judicial decision making. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law 22(1):53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, F. Y., Y. D. Liu, F. Gao., and K. Wang. 2019. Research on the construction of artificial intelligence judicial database based on graph fusion. Journal of Yangzhou University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) 23 (6):89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, W. M. 2018. Some thoughts on the application prospects of legal artificial intelligence in China. Tsinghua Law Science 12(2):108–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, W. M. 2020. From generalization to specialization: Rethinking the application of artificial intelligence in China’s judicial system. Law Forum 35 (2):17–23.
   Google Scholar