A Review Helpfulness Modeling Mechanism for Online E-commerce: Multi-Channel CNN End‑to‑End Approach

References

• Agnihotri, A., and S. Bhattacharya. 2016. Online review helpfulness: Role of qualitative factors. Psychology & Marketing 33 (11):1006–153. doi:10.1002/mar.20934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S. N., and M. Laroche. 2017. Analyzing electronic word of mouth: A social commerce construct. International Journal of Information Management 37 (3):202–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengio, Y., R. Ducharme, and P. Vincent. 2000. A neural probabilistic language model. In Proceedings of the 2000 Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) Conference, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bilal, M., M. Marjani, I. A. T. Hashem, N. Malik, M. I. U. Lali, and A. Gani. 2021. Profiling reviewers’ social network strength and predicting the “Helpfulness” of online customer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 45:101026. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., W. Duan, and Q. Gan. 2011. Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems 50 (2):511–21. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., M. Qiu, Y. Yang, J. Zhou, J. Huang, X. Li, and F. S. Bao. 2019. Multi-domain gated CNN for review helpfulness prediction. In Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2630–2636.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., S. Xiao, C. Zhang, and W. Wang. 2022. An orthogonal-space-learning-based method for selecting semantically helpful reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 53:101154. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and J. Xie. 2008. Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management science 54 (3):477–91. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiriatti, G., D. Brunato, F. Dell’Orletta, and G. Venturi. 2019. What Makes a Review helpful? Predicting the Helpfulness of Italian TripAdvisor Reviews. In Proceedings of the Sixth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics, Bari, Italy: CEUR, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, H., and K. -S. Shin. 2020. Genetic algorithm-optimized multi-channel convolutional neural network for stock market prediction. Neural Computing & Applications 32 (12):7897–914. doi:10.1007/s00521-019-04236-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, C., and M. Gatti. 2014. Deep convolutional neural networks for sentiment analysis of short texts. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, Dublin, Ireland: Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics, 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., J. Rong, H. Wang, and Y. Zhang. 2021. Neighbor-aware review helpfulness prediction. Decision Support Systems 148:113581. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., L. Zheng, J. He, J. Rong, H. Wang, and Y. Zhang. 2020. An interactive network for end-to-end review helpfulness modeling. Data Science and Engineering 5 (3):261–79. doi:10.1007/s41019-020-00133-1.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, M., Y. Feng, M. Sun, P. Li, H. Wang, and J. Wang. 2018. Multi-task neural learning architecture for end-to-end identification of helpful reviews. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, IEEE Press, 343–350.
   Google Scholar
• Filieri, R., and M. Mariani. 2021. The role of cultural values in consumers’ evaluation of online review helpfulness: A big data approach. International Marketing Review 38 (6):1267–88. doi:10.1108/IMR-07-2020-0172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, S., T. Qi, C. Wu, F. Wu, X. Xie, and Y. Huang. 2019. Helpfulness-aware review based neural recommendation. CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction 1 (4):285–95. doi:10.1007/s42486-019-00023-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, A., and P. G. Ipeirotis. 2007. Designing novel review ranking systems: Predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 303–310.
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, A., and P. G. Ipeirotis. 2010. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 23 (10):1498–512. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2010.188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, S. A., and A. Mafael. 2017. Cutting through the online review jungle—investigating selective eWOM processing. Journal of Interactive Marketing 37:89–104. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, B., C. Zhang, J. Liu, and X. Ma. 2019. Improving text classification with weighted word embeddings via a multi-channel TextCNN model. Neurocomputing 363:366–74. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, W., H. Chen, Z. Hai, S. Poria, and L. Bing. 2022. SANCL: Multimodal Review Helpfulness Prediction with Selective Attention and Natural Contrastive Learning. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea: International Committee on Computational Linguistics, 5666–5677.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Q., Y. Kou, and D. Snaidauf. 2019. Experimental Evaluation of CNN Parameters for Text Categorization in Legal Document Review. In Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), IEEE, 4320–4324.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, M. E., M. E. Tozal, and A. Islam. 2018. Helpfulness prediction of online product reviews. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2018, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hazarika, B., K. Chen, and M. Razi. 2021. Are numeric ratings true representations of reviews? A study of inconsistency between reviews and ratings. International Journal of Business Information Systems 38 (1):85–106. doi:10.1504/IJBIS.2021.118637.
   Google Scholar
• He, X., L. Liao, H. Zhang, L. Nie, X. Hu, and T. -S. Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• He, R., and J. McAuley. 2016. Ups and downs: Modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 507–517.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. S., and M. F. Rahman. 2022. Detection of potential customers’ empathy behavior towards customers’ reviews. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 65:102881. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. S., M. F. Rahman, M. K. Uddin, and M. K. Hossain. 2022. Customer sentiment analysis and prediction of halal restaurants using machine learning approaches. Journal of Islamic Marketing(ahead-Of-print)(ahead-Of-Print). doi:10.1108/JIMA-04-2021-0125.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, A. H., K. Chen, D. C. Yen, and T. P. Tran. 2015. A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior 48:17–27. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y. -H., and K. Chen. 2016. Predicting hotel review helpfulness: The impact of review visibility, and interaction between hotel stars and review ratings. International Journal of Information Management 36 (6):929–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janiesch, C., P. Zschech, and K. Heinrich. 2021. Machine learning and deep learning. Electronic Markets 31 (3):685–95. doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Q., G. Ravid, and S. Rafaeli. 2004. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research 15 (2):194–210. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, Z. Y., and Z. Niu. 2021. CNN with depthwise separable convolutions and combined kernels for rating prediction. Expert Systems with Applications 170:114528. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1746–1751.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. J., E. Maslowska, and E. C. Malthouse. 2018. Understanding the effects of different review features on purchase probability. International Journal of Advertising 37 (1):29–53. doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1340928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. -M., P. Pantel, T. Chklovski, and M. Pennacchiotti. 2006. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sydney, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 423–430.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P., and J. Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412 6980.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, R., P. Kumar, and B. Bhasker. 2020. Oslcfit (organic simultaneous LSTM and CNN Fit): A novel deep learning based solution for sentiment polarity classification of reviews. Expert Systems with Applications 157:113488. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korfiatis, N., E. García-Bariocanal, and S. Sánchez-Alonso. 2012. Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 11 (3):205–17. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2011.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamoorthy, S. 2015. Linguistic features for review helpfulness prediction. Expert Systems with Applications 42 (7):3751–59. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 86 (11):2278–324. doi:10.1109/5.726791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., L. Huang, C. -H. Tan, and K. -K. Wei. 2013. Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 17 (4):101–36. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415170404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., X. Li, B. Lee, and J. Kim. 2021. A hybrid CNN-based review helpfulness filtering model for improving e-commerce recommendation Service. Applied Sciences 11 (18):8613. doi:10.3390/app11188613.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Y. Cao, C. -Y. Lin, Y. Huang, and M. Zhou. 2007. Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, Prague, Czech Republic: Association for Computational Linguistics, 334–342.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., X. Qiu, and X. Huang. 2016. Recurrent neural network for text classification with multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605 05101.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., B. Yuan, and Y. Ma. 2022. A multi-task dual attention deep recommendation model using ratings and review helpfulness. Applied Intelligence 52 (5):5595–607. doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02666-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., P. Tsaparas, A. Ntoulas, and L. Polanyi. 2010. Exploiting social context for review quality prediction. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 691–700.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, M., and A. Hussain. 2017. Helpfulness of product reviews as a function of discrete positive and negative emotions. Computers in Human Behavior 73:290–302. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, M., and A. Hussain. 2018. An analysis of review content and reviewer variables that contribute to review helpfulness. Information Processing & Management 54 (1):88–104. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2017.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., and P. Pu. 2014. Prediction of helpful reviews using emotions extraction. In Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, California, USA: AAAI Press, 1551–1557.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro, N., L. Ardissono, and G. Petrone. 2021. User and item-aware estimation of review helpfulness. Information Processing & Management 58 (1):102434. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., A. J. Flanagin, and R. B. Medders. 2010. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. The Journal of Communication 60 (3):413–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., and M. Jenamani. 2021. Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: A multi-perspective approach. Information Processing & Management 58 (3):102538. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, A. H., T. Alwada‘n, and O. Al-Momani. 2016. Arabic text categorization using support vector machine, Naïve Bayes and neural network. GSTF Journal on Computing (JoC) 5 (1):1–8. doi:10.7603/s40601-016-0016-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo-Ye, T. L., and A. P. Sinha. 2014. The influence of reviewer engagement characteristics on online review helpfulness: A text regression model. Decision Support Systems 61:47–58. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H., and R. Grishman. 2015. Relation extraction: Perspective from convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Vector Space Modeling for Natural Language Processing, Denver, Colorado: Association for Computational Linguistics, 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T., and M. Le Nguyen. 2019. An ensemble method with sentiment features and clustering support. Neurocomputing 370:155–65. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.08.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmedilla, M., M. R. Martínez-Torres, and S. Toral. 2022. Prediction and modelling online reviews helpfulness using 1D Convolutional Neural Networks. Expert Systems with Applications 198:116787. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, X., L. Hou, and K. Liu. 2020. Predicting the future increment of review helpfulness: An empirical study based on a two-wave data set. Electronic Library 39 (1):59–76. doi:10.1108/EL-06-2020-0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. H., H. K. Kim, I. Y. Choi, and J. K. Kim. 2012. A literature review and classification of recommender systems research. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (11):10059–72. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashchenko, Y., M. F. Rahman, M. S. Hossain, M. K. Uddin, and T. Islam. 2022. Emotional and the normative aspects of customers’ reviews. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 68:103011. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan, D., S. Wang, N. Huyan, J. Chanussot, R. Wang, X. Liang, B. Hou, and L. Jiao. 2022. Element-Wise Feature Relation Learning Network for Cross-Spectral Image Patch Matching. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 33 (8):3372–3386. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3052756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaschning, S., M. Pandelaere, and I. Vermeir. 2015. When consistency matters: The effect of valence consistency on review helpfulness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20 (2):136–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, X., X. Li, and J. R. Rose. 2018. Review helpfulness assessment based on convolutional neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808 09016.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, G., B. Datta, and S. Mukherjee. 2019. Role of electronic word-of-mouth content and valence in influencing online purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Communications 25 (6):661–84. doi:10.1080/13527266.2018.1497681.
   Google Scholar
• Saumya, S., J. P. Singh, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2020. Predicting the helpfulness score of online reviews using convolutional neural network. Soft Computing 24 (15):10989–1005. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-03851-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, A. E. 2011. Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21 (3):226–39. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, R. -P., H. -R. Zhang, H. Yu, and F. Min. 2019. Sentiment based matrix factorization with reliability for recommendation. Expert Systems with Applications 135:249–58. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Q., J. Niu, Z. Yao, and H. Yan. 2019. Exploring eWOM in online customer reviews: Sentiment analysis at a fine-grained level. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 81:68–78. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, W., X. Zhang, and S. Karimi. 2020. Beyond mean rating: Probabilistic aggregation of star ratings based on helpfulness. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71 (7):784–99. doi:10.1002/asi.24297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topaloglu, O., and M. Dass. 2021. The impact of online review content and linguistic style matching on new product sales: The moderating role of review helpfulness. Decision Sciences 52 (3):749–75. doi:10.1111/deci.12378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dinter, R., C. Catal, and B. Tekinerdogan. 2021. A Multi-Channel Convolutional Neural Network approach to automate the citation screening process. Applied Soft Computing 112:107765. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., and X. Gu. 2015. Towards dropout training for convolutional neural networks. Neural Networks 71:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2015.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. -Y., J. -S. Yang, and J. -J. Wang. 2009. Margin calibration in SVM class-imbalanced learning. Neurocomputing 73 (1–3):397–411. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2009.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Y. Yan, M. Qiu, and F. Bao. 2015. Semantic analysis and helpfulness prediction of text for online product reviews. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Beijing, China: Association for Computational Linguistics, 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., J. Yao, and A. Qazi. 2020. Does the review deserve more helpfulness when its title resembles the content? Locating helpful reviews by text mining. Information Processing & Management 57 (2):102179. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, D., S. D. Bond, and H. Zhang. 2014. Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly 38 (2):539–60. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., S. Roller, and B. Wallace. 2016. MGNC-CNN: A simple approach to exploiting multiple word embeddings for sentence classification. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. San Diego, California: Association for Computational Linguistics,1522–1527.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., T. Tran, and Y. Mao. 2012. Opinion helpfulness prediction in the presence of “words of few mouths”. World Wide Web 15 (2):117–38. doi:10.1007/s11280-011-0127-3.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Z. Xu, L. Liu, M. Guo, and J. Yun. 2018. Towards accurate deceptive opinions detection based on word order-preserving CNN. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018:1–9. doi:10.1155/2018/2410206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar