A Supervised Model of Multivariable Control in Quadruple Tank System

References

• Aftab, R. A., S. Zaidi, M. Danish, S. M. Adnan, K. B. Ansari, and M. Danish. 2021. Support vector regression-based model for phenol adsorption in rotating packed bed adsorber. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1 (1):452–622. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14953-9.
   Google Scholar
• Biswajit, D., and S. J. Mija. 2021. Emotional learning based controller for quadruple tank system - an improved stimuli design for multiple set-point tracking. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 68 (issue. 11). doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3038083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuongvo, L., L. V. T. Nguyen, and M. Lee, “Fractional order modeling and control of a quadruple-tank process,” in Proceedings of 2020 5th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development, GTSD, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, pp. 334–39, 2020. doi:10.1109/GTSD50082.2020.9303059
   Google Scholar
• Doguş Universitesi Istanbul, International symposium on innovations in intelligent systems and applications 2011.06.15-18 Istanbul, and INISTA 2011.06.15-18 Istanbul, International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), Istanbul, Turkey, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Govinda Kumar, E., B. Shiva Ram, U. B. Deepak, and G. Sabarinathan. 2018. The quadruple tank process with an interaction: A mathematical model. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7 (24):172–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hipni, A., A. E. Shafie, A. Najah, O. A. Karim, A. Hussain, and M. Mukhlisin. 2013. Daily forecasting of dam water levels: Comparing a support vector machine (svm) model with adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (anfis). Water Resources Management 27 (10):3803–23. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0382-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaprakash, J., T. Senthil Rajan, and T. H. Babu. 2014. Analysis of modelling methods of quadruple tank system. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering 3 (8):11552–65. doi:10.15662/ijareeie.2014.0308070.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, K. H. 2000. The quadruple-tank process: A multivariable laboratory process with an adjustable zero. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 8 (3):456–65. doi:10.1109/87.845876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchgassner, W., O. Wallscheid, and J. Bocker. 2021. Data-driven permanent magnet temperature estimation in synchronous motors with supervised machine learning: A benchmark. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 36 (3):2059–67. doi:10.1109/TEC.2021.3052546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., I. Kyoung, J. Pil Heo, Y. Park, Y. Lim, D. Hyun Kim, Y. Lee, and D. Ryook Yang. 2017. A simple method to make the quadruple tank system near linear. Korean Chemical Engineering Research 55 (6):767–70.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., W. Wang, F. Harrou, and Y. Sun. 2020. Wind power prediction using ensemble learning-based models. IEEE Access 8 (2):61517–27. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983234.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T., and H. T. Le, “Water level prediction at tich-bui river in Vietnam using support vector regression,” International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC), Kobe, Japan, 2019. doi:10.3390/w14101617
   Google Scholar
• Sapitang, M., W. M. Ridwan, K. F. Kushiar, A. N. Ahmed, and A. E. Shafie. 2020. Machine learning application in reservoir water level forecasting for sustainable hydropower generation strategy. Sustainability 12 (15):6121–30. doi:10.3390/su12156121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, D., and F. Esquembre, “The quadruple tank process: An interactive tool for control education,” 7th European Control Conference, ECC 2003, Cambridge, UK, September 1-4, IEEE, pp. 3267–72, 2003. doi: 10.23919/ECC.2003.7086543.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, S., G. B. Chidhambaram, and S. Dhandapani. 2021. Modeling and validation of a four-tank system for level control process using black box and white box model approaches. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering 16 (2):282–94. doi:10.1002/tee.23295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suja, R., M. Malar, and T. Thyagarajan. 2009. Modeling of quadruple tank system using soft computing techniques. European Journal of Scientific Research 29 (2):249–64.
   Google Scholar
• Tousi, A., and M. Lujan. 2022. Comparative analysis of machine learning models for performance prediction of the spec benchmarks. IEEE Access 10 (4):11994–2011. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142240.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., and S. Wang. 2020. Machine learning-based water level prediction in lake erie. Water 12 (10):2654–60. doi:10.3390/w12102654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., H. Wang, and Z. Wang. 2011. Groundwater level forecasting based on support vector machine. Applied Mechanics and Materials 44-47 (1):1365–69. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., A. Hahn, Y. Q. Wen, and W. Q. Sun. 2019. Optimized support vector regression algorithm- based modeling of ship dynamics. Applied Ocean Research 90 (6):101842–50.
   Google Scholar