Toward Data-Driven and Multi-Scale Modeling for Material Flow Simulation: Characteristic Analysis of Modeling Methods

References

• Barlas, P., and C. Heavey. 2016. Automation of input data to discrete event simulation for manufacturing: A review. International Journal of Modeling Simulation and Scientific Computing 7 (1):1630001. doi:10.1142/S1793962316300016.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H., S. Ohmori, and K. Yoshimoto. 2011. Improvement of particle swarm optimization: Proposal of R-best model and parameter adjustment with consideration to searching phase and state. 21st International Conference on Production Research, Stuttgart, Germany, 2079–16.
   Google Scholar
• Henkenjohann, M., R. Joppen, D. Kochling, S. Enzberg, A. Kuhn, and R. Dumitrescu. 2021. Identification and specification of standard modules in production for a material flow simulation. Procedia CIRP 99:21–26. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hoellthaler, G., M. Schreiber, K. Vernickel, J. Isa, J. Fischer, N. Weinert, R. Rosen, and S. Braunreuther. 2019. Reconfiguration of production systems using optimization and material flow simulation. Procedia CIRP 81:133–38. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.024.
   Google Scholar
• Karnok, D., and L. Monostori. 2011. Determination of routings and process time information from event logs. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 44 (1):14055–60. doi:10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.01448.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhof, P. 2016. Automatically generation flow shop simulation models from SAP data. Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 3588–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner, M., P. Mothwurf, L. Nohe, and R. Daub. 2023. Material flow simulation in Lithium-ion battery cell manufacturing as a planning tool for cost and energy optimization. 5th Conference on Production Systems and Logistics, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 212–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lingitz, L., V. Gallina, F. Ansari, D. Gyulai, A. Pfeiffer, W. Sihn, and L. Monostori. 2018. Lead time prediction using machine learning algorithms: A case study by a semiconductor manufacturer. Procedia CIRP 72:1051–56. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.148.
   Google Scholar
• May, M. C., C. Nestroy, L. Overbeck, and G. Lanza. 2024. Automated model generation framework for material flow simulations of production systems. International Journal of Production Research 62 (1–2):141–56. doi:10.1080/00207543.2023.2284833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monostori, L. 2014. Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP 17:9–13. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.115.
   Google Scholar
• Nagahara, S., T. Kaihara, N. Fujii, and D. Kokuryo. 2022. A proposal of data-driven and multi-scale modeling approach for material flow simulation. IFIP WG 5.7 International Conference APMS 2022, Gyeongju, Korea, 297–215.
   Google Scholar
• Nagahara, S., S. Serita, Y. Shiho, S. Zheng, H. Wang, T. Chida, and C. Gupta. 2020. Toward data-driven modeling of material flow simulation: Automatic parameter calibration of multiple agents from sparse production log. 16th IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 1096–101.
   Google Scholar
• Nagahara, S., T. A. Sprock, and M. M. Helu. 2019. Toward data-driven production simulation modeling: Dispatching rule identification by machine learning techniques. Procedia CIRP 81:222–27. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.039.
   Google Scholar
• Popovics, G., and L. Monostori. 2013. ISA standard simulation model generation supported by data stored in low level controllers. Procedia CIRP 12:432–37. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.09.074.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, R., G. Wichert, G. Lo, and K. D. Bettenhausen. 2015. About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-Papersonline 48 (3):567–72. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbacher, L. M., T. Düe, M. Veigt, and M. Freitag. 2023. Automatic model generation for material flow simulations of third-party logistics. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-023-02257-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar