Teaching Poverty With Geographic Visualization and Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A Case Study of East Buffalo and Food Access

REFERENCES

• Beaumont, J., Land, T., Leather, S., & Mucklow, C. (1995). Report from the Policy Sub-group to the Nutrition Task Force: Low Income Project Team. Watford, UK: Institute of Grocery Distribution.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R. M., Danziger, S. H., & Schoeni, R. F. (2006). Working and poor: How economic and policy changes are affecting low-wage workers. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhamer, D. J., Corrigan, J., & Harris, T. M. ( Eds.). (2010). The spatial humanities: GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K.-t. (2010). Introduction to Geographic Information Systems (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGrawHill.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, G., Eyre, H., & Guy, C. (2002). Deriving indicators of access to food retail provision in British cities: Studies of Cardiff, Leeds and Bradford. Urban Studies, 39, 2041–2060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=41861
   Google Scholar
• Dear, M., Ketchum, J., Luria, S., & Richardson, D. (2011). GeoHumanities: Art, history, text at the edge of place. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B. (2008). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Eitzen, D. S., & Smith, K. E. (2009). Experiencing poverty: Voices from the bottom. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Friedhoff, A., & Kulkarni, S. (2014). Metro monitor—April 2014. Retrieved from Brookings Institute website: http://www.brookings.edu/research/interactives/metromonitor#/M15380
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S., Ganapati, N. E., De La Rosa, M., & Rojas, P. (2010). Spatial disparity of HIV/AIDS service providers: The case of Miami-Dade County. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 9, 169–189. doi:10.1080/15381501003795543
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (1995). The war against the poor. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garoutte, L., & Bobbitt-Zeher, D. (2011). Changing students’ perceptions of inequality?: Combining traditional methods and a budget exercise to facilitate a sociological perspective. Teaching Sociology, 39, 227–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., & Clifton, K. J. (2000). Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Issues and methods using geographic information systems (Report No. SWUTC/00/167202-1). College Station: Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from http://swutc.tamu.edu/publications/technicalreports/167202-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, A. (2007). Why social work needs mapping? Journal of Social Work Education,43, 205–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juarez, P. D., Robinson, P. L. & Matthews-Juarez, P. (2002). 100% access, zero, health disparities, and GIS. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 16, 155–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung, J.-K. (2011). Participatory and collaborative geovisualization in the Masten District neighborhood planning process in Buffalo New York: Making geovisualization together. Journal of Korean Cartographic Association, 11(3), 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., Wheeler, J., & Holloway, S. (2009). Urban geography. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (2013). American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Krase, K. S. (2013). Differences in racially disproportionate reporting of child maltreatment across report sources. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7, 351–369.
   Google Scholar
• Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M., Macuire, D., & Rhind, D. (2011). Geographic information systems & science. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (1994). Visualization in modern cartography: Setting the agenda. In A. M. MacEachren & D. R. F. Taylor ( Eds.), Visualization in modern cartography ( pp. 1–11). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• McEntee, J., & Agyeman, A. (2010). Towards the development of a GIS method for identifying rural food deserts: Geographic access in Vermont, USA. Applied Geography, 30, 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. J. (2007). Social exclusion in space and time. In K. W. Axhausen ( Ed.), Moving through nets: The physical and social dimensions of travel ( pp. 353–380). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Mohai, P., & Saha, R. (2007). Racial inequality in the distribution of hazardous waste: A national-level reassessment. Social Problems, 54, 343–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rank, M. (1994). Living on the edge: The realities of welfare in America. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, B. R. (2008). The economics of poverty and discrimination. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Steck, L. W., Engler, J. N., Ligon, M., Druen, P. B., & Cosgrove, E. (2011). Doing poverty: Learning outcomes among students participating in the community action poverty simulation program. Teaching Sociology, 39, 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trattner, W. I. (1999). From poor law to welfare state: A history of social welfare in America (6th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). American Community Survey. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/acs/www/
   Google Scholar
• Warrington, M. (2005). Mirage in the desert? Access to educational opportunities in an area of social exclusion. Antipode 37, 794–816.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan, A., Wrigley, N., Warm, D., & Cannings, E. (2002). Life in a “food desert.” Urban Studies, 39, 2083–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Y.-L. I., & Hillier, A. E. (2001). Evaluating a community-based homelessness prevention program: A Geographic Information System approach. Administration in Social Work, 25, 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar