Preparing PhD-Level Clinical Social Work Practitioners for the 21st Century

REFERENCES

• Anastas, J. (2012). Doctoral education in social work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anastas, J., & Kuerbis, A. (2009). Doctoral education in social work: What we know and what we need to know. Social Work, 54, 71–81. doi:10.1093/sw/54.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastas, J., & Videka, L. (2012). Does social work need a practice doctorate? Clinical Social Work Journal, 40, 268–276. doi:10.1007/s10615-012-0392-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsky, A., Green, D., & Ayayo, M. (2014). Hiring priorities for BSW/MSW programs in the United States: Informing doctoral programs about current needs. Journal of Social Work, 14, 62–82. doi:10.1177/1468017313476772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belcher, J., Pecukonis, E., & Knight, C. (2011). Where have all the teachers gone? The selling out of social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31, 195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Berzoff, J. (2011). Falling through the cracks: Psychodynamic practice with vulnerable and at risk clients. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berzoff, J., Flanagan, L., & Hertz, P. (2011). Inside out and outside in: Psychodynamic theory and practice in multicultural contexts. Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bettman, J., Thompson, K., Padykula, N., & Berzoff, J. (2009). Innovations in doctoral education: Distance education methodology applied. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29, 291–312. doi:10.1080/08841230903018397
   Google Scholar
• Biegel, D. (2008). Social work education: Research. In T. Mizrahi & L. Davis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social work (Vol. IV, 20th ed., pp. 130–133). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bocage, M., Homonoff, E., & Riley, P. (1995). Measuring the impact of the current state and national fiscal crises on human service agencies and social work training. Social Work, 40, 701–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M. (1993). The student–field instructor relationship: The critical factor in field education. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(2), 23–36. doi:10.1300/J001v11n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M. (2010). Achieving competence in social work through field education. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucky, S., Marques, S., Daly, J., Alley, J., & Karp, A. (2010). Supervision characteristics related to the supervisory working alliance as rated by doctoral-level supervisees. The Clinical Supervisor, 29, 149–163. doi:10.1080/07325223.2010.519270
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, M., & Keenan, E. K. (2012). The common factors model for generalist practice. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Castonguay, L., & Beutler, L. (Eds.). (2006). Principles of therapeutic change that work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, B., & Cain, M. (1996). Students with disabilities: A proactive approach to accommodation. Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 339–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2011). 2010 statistics on social work education in the United States. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Donner, S. (1996). Field work crisis: Dilemmas, dangers and opportunities. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 66, 317–331. doi:10.1080/00377319609517469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, C. (2012). Introduction. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82, 113–115.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Rittner, B. (n.d.). The doctorate in social work (DSW) degree: Emergence of a new practice doctorate (Report of the Task Force on the DSW Degree convened by the CSWE Social Work Leadership Forum). Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=59954
   Google Scholar
• Everett, J., Miehls, D., DuBois, C., & Garran, A. M. (2011). The developmental model of supervision as reflected in the experiences of field supervisors and graduate students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31, 250–264.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan-Wilen, R., Springer, D. W., Ambrosino, B., & White, B. (2006). The support of adjunct faculty: An academic imperative. Social Work Education, 25, 39–51. doi:10.1080/02615470500477870
   Google Scholar
• Fong, R. (2011, May). Framing education for a science of social work: Missions, curricu- 660 lum and doctoral training. Paper presented at the Shaping a Science of Social Work Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education in Social Work (GADE). (1992). Guidelines for quality in social work doctoral programs. Retrieved from http://www.gadephd.org
   Google Scholar
• Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education in Social Work (GADE). (2003). Guidelines for quality in social work doctoral programs (revised). Retrieved from http://www.gadephd.org
   Google Scholar
• Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education in Social Work (GADE). (2013). PhD program quality guidelines. Retrieved from http://gadephd.org/Portals/0/docs/GADE%20quality%20guidelines%20approved%204%2006%202013%20%282%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S., & Wardell, P. (1988). Who’s responsible? The field liability dilemma. Journal of Social Work Education, 24, 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitterman, A., & Knight, C. (2013). Evidence-guided practice: Integrating the science and art of social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94, 70–78. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. (2007). Social work education and clinical learning: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35, 15–23. doi:10.1007/s10615-006-0067-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshong, L. (2009). Clinical social work practice and regulation: An overview. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27, 135–169. doi:10.1080/07325220802490828
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M., Allen-Meares, P., & Ruffolo, M. (2007). Teaching evidence-based practice: Strategic and pedagogical recommendations for schools of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 561–568. doi:10.1177/1049731507300191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M., & Garland, E. (2011). Our best schools of social work: How good are they? Social Work Research, 35, 195–201. doi:10.1093/swr/35.4.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Y., & Munch, S. (2010). Faculty with practice experience: The new dinosaurs in the social work academy? Journal of Social Work Education, 46, 57–66. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2010.200800050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W., Weisman, D., & Smith, T. (1996). The use of adjunct faculty: An exploratory study of eight social work programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students’ views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 357–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A. (1991). Is there a role for clinical doctoral education: Yes! Journal of Social Work Education, 27, 235–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailick, M. (1991). Reassessing assessment in clinical social work practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 62, 3–19. doi:10.1080/00377319109516696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., Angell, B., Andrews, C., & Curry, A. (2012). Client-provider relationship and treatment outcome: A systematic review of substance abuse, child welfare, and mental health services research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 3, 233–267.
   Google Scholar
• Marziali, E., & Alexander, L. (1991). The power of the therapeutic relationship. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 383–391. doi:10.1037/h0079268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtry, S., & McClelland, R. (1997). Trends in student–faculty ratios and the use of non-tenure-track faculty in MSW programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 293–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendenhall, A. (2007). Switching hats. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 27, 273–290. doi:10.1300/J067v27n03_17
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Aymer, C. (2009). The apparent conflict between commitment to the development of the profession and the imperatives of the academy. Social Work Education, 28, 81–95. doi:10.1080/02615470802109908
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2011). Furthering your social work education: Obtaining a doctorate. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://careers.socialworkers.org/documents/Furthering%20your%20social%20work%20education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2013, September 23–24). Advanced practice doctorate programs examined. NASW Social Work Policy Institute symposium. Task Force meeting. Reported in the November 2013 NASW News.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, C., & Irwin, J. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social, economic and political environment. Journal of Social Work, 9, 345–358. doi:10.1177/1468017309334848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcross, J., & Lambert, M. (2011). Evidence-based therapy relationships. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norcross, J., & Lambert, M. (2012). Evidence-based therapy relationships. Retrieved from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices: http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/Norcross.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Nye, C. (2012). Introduction to theoretical perspectives. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82, 122–123. doi:10.1080/00377317.2012.696984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcutt, B., & Mills, P. (1982). A model of doctoral education: Practice dimensions. In A. Rosen & J. Stretch (Eds.), Doctoral education in social work: Issues, perspectives and evaluation (pp. 3–10). St. Louis, MO: GADE.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman, C. (2013). Adjuncts in social work programs: Good practice or unethical? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33, 209–219. doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.778939
   Google Scholar
• Power, R., & Bogo, M. (2003). Educating field instructors and students to deal with challenges in their teaching relationships. The Clinical Supervisor, 21, 39–58. doi:10.1300/J001v21n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, J., DiClemente, C., & Norcross, J. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1114. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin, M., & Blome, W. (1998). The impact of managed care on field instruction. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 365–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. (2008). Practitioner’s guide to using research for evidence-based practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saltzburg, S., Greene, G., & Drew, H. (2010). Using live supervision in field education: Preparing social work students for clinical practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 91, 293–299. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schamess, G. (2012). Mutual influence in psychodynamic supervision. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82, 142–160. doi:10.1080/00377317.2012.693012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, R., Morrish, J., & Liu, G. (2008). Demographic trends in social work over a quarter-century in an increasingly female profession. Social Work, 53, 103–114. doi:10.1093/sw/53.2.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, B. (1991). Is there a role for clinical doctoral education? No! Journal of Social Work Education, 27, 231–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, G., Williams, J., & Segall, A. (2007). Social work education and clinical learning. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35, 3–14. doi:10.1007/s10615-006-0046-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J., & Greeno, C. (2013). When Bambi meets Godzilla. Best Practices in Mental Health, 9, 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, R. (2007). Life, death, survival: Where goes our profession? [Message from the President.]. Currents of the New York City Chapter, National Association of Social Workers, 52(2), 2, 9, 10, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Stegall, S., & Nangle, D. (2005). Successes and failures in the implementation of a manualized treatment for childhood depression in an outpatient setting. Clinical Case Studies, 4, 227–245. doi:10.1177/1534650103259718
   Google Scholar
• Stoesz, S., Karger, H., & Carrilio, T. (2010). A dream deferred: How social work education lost its way and what can be done about it. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D. (2003, January). Empirical progress in social work scholarship: The role of theory. Paper presented at the 2003 Conference for Society for Social Work and Research, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010–2011). Occupational outlook handbook: Social workers 2010-2011. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/community-and-social-service/social-workers.htm#tab-6
   Google Scholar
• Urdang, E. (1991). The discipline of faculty advising. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 5, 117–137. doi:10.1300/J067v05n01_10
   Google Scholar
• Urdang, E. (1999). Becoming a field instructor: A key experience in professional development. The Clinical Supervisor, 18, 85–103. doi:10.1300/J001v18n01_06
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, D., Edwards, S., Goghagan, D., Huff, M., Pereira, A., & Wilson, P. (1998). Preparing social work doctoral students for teaching: Report of a survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zastrow, C., & Bremner, J. (2004). Social work education responds to the shortage of persons with both a doctorate and a professional social work degree. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 351–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar