832
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teaching Social Work Practice Research to Enhance Research-Minded Expertise

, &

References

  • Austin, M. J., Dal Santo, T. S., & Lee, C. (2012). Building organizational supports for research-minded practitioners. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 9, 174–211. doi:10.1080/15433714.2012.636327
  • Austin, M. J., Fisher, M., & Uggerhøj, L. (2014). Helsinki statement on social work practice research. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(Suppl. 1), 7–13. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2014.981426
  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implication of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
  • Damşa, C., & Andriessen, J. (2012). Shared epistemic agency for knowledge creation. In A. Moen, I. Anders, & S. Paavola (Eds.), Collaborative knowledge creation: Practices, tools, concepts (pp. 203–217). Retrieved from https://www.sensepublishers.com/media/1329-collaborative-knowledge-creation.pdf
  • Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York, NY: Touchstone. (Original work published 1938)
  • Driessens, K., Saurama, E., & Fargion, S. (2011). Research with social workers to improve their social interventions. European Journal of Social Work, 14, 71–88. doi:10.1080/13691457.2010.516629
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Evans, T., Hardy, M., & Shaw, I. (2010). Evidence and knowledge for practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Fook, J. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London, England: Sage.
  • Fook, J. (2004). Critical reflection and organisational learning and change (A case study). In N. Gould & M. Baldwin (Eds.), Social work, critical reflection and the learning organisation (pp. 57–73). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  • Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Toward a trialogical approach to learning: Personal reflections [draft]. Lifelong Learning in Europe (Lline), 13, 22–29.
  • Hakkarainen, K., Lonka, K., & Lipponen, L. (2004). Tutkiva oppiminen: Älykkään toiminnan rajat ja niiden ylittäminen [Learning through discovery]. Helsinki, Finland: WSOY.
  • Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 65–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Heikki Waris Institute. (2015). What is it? Retrieved from http://blogs.helsinki.fi/heikkiwaris/what-is-it/
  • Hinkka, T., Juvonen, T., Kangas, S., Mustonen, T., Saurama, E., Tapola-Tuohikumpu, S., & Yliruka, L. (Eds.). (2009). Praksis sosiaalityön käytännön opetus ja oppimisen tutkimus [Praxsis: Research on practice teaching and learning]. Helsinki, Finland: Socca.
  • Kääriäinen, A. (2012). Opiskelijat käytäntöjen tutkijoina – käytäntötutkimuksen hämäryydestä hienoihin oivalluksiin [Students as researchers of social work practices: From the obscurity of practice research to brilliant insights]. In N. Tuohino, A. Pohjola, & M. Suonio (Eds.), Sosiaalityön käytännönopetus liikkeessä (pp. 88–107). Rovaniemi, Finland: SOSNET julkaisuja.
  • Kananoja, A. (2009). Practice-research in social work in Finland. ( Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from http://www.socca.fi/files/1050/Practice_research_paper_kananoja_June2009.pdf
  • Keskinen, J., Kääriäinen, A., Pitkänen, R., Tukiala, A., & Oravisto, J. (2012). Encounters in social work: Recipes for interaction. Helsinki, Finland: Socca.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Metropolitan Praxis Network. (2015). Praxis network in the Helsinki metropolitan area. Retrieved from http://blogs.helsinki.fi/heikkiwaris/praxis/praxis-network-in-the-helsinki-metropolitan-area/
  • Moe, A., Tronvoll, I. M., & Gjeitnes, K. (2014). A reflective approach in practice research. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(Suppl. 1), 14–25. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2014.982157
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Paavola, S., Engeström, R., & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). The trialogical approach as a new form of mediation. In A. Moen, I. Anders, & S. Paavola (Eds.), Collaborative knowledge creation: Practices, tools, concepts (pp. 1–14). Retrieved from https://www.sensepublishers.com/media/1329-collaborative-knowledge-creation.pdf
  • Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor–An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535–557. doi:10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0
  • Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Kosonen, K., & Karlgren, K. (2011). The roles and uses of design principles for developing the trialogical approach on learning. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 233–246. doi:10.1080/21567069.2011.624171
  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576. doi:10.3102/00346543074004557
  • Pierson, J., & Thomas, M. (2002). Dictionary of social work. Glasgow, Scotland: Harper Collins.
  • Satka, M. (1997). Social science and social work education: A Finnish example of reconstructing the curriculum. In M. Satka (Ed.), Sosiaalityön tulevaisuutta rakentamassa: Artikkeleita sosiaalityön opetuksen uudistamisesta (University of Jyväskylä Social Sciences Working Papers 101, pp. 113–128). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
  • Satka, M. (2014). Looking to the past for sustainable social work. In T. Harrikari, P. Rauhala, & E. Virokannas (Eds.), Social change and social work: The changing societal conditions of social work in time and place (pp. 193–202). Surrey, England: Ashgate.
  • Saurama, E., & Julkunen, I. (2012). Approaching practice research in theory and practice. In E. Marthinssen & I. Julkunen (Eds.), Critical studies in socio-critical diversity: Vol. 1 practice research in Nordic social work: Knowledge production in transition (pp. 171–193). London, England: Whiting & Birch.
  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1370–1373). New York, NY: MacMillan Reference.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X027002004
  • Uggerhøj, L. (2011). What is practice research in social work: Definitions, barriers and possibilities. Social Work & Society, 9, 45–59.
  • Uggerhøj, L. (2014). Learning from each other: Collaboration processes in practice research. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(Suppl. 1), 44–57. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2014.928647
  • Webber, M., Hardy, M., Cauvain, S., Kääriäinen, A., Satka, M., Yliruka, L., & Shaw, I. (2014). W(h)ither the academy? An exploration of the role of university social work in shaping the future of social work in Europe. European Journal of Social Work, 17, 627–640. doi:10.1080/13691457.2014.912202
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
  • Yliruka, L. (2012). The Mirror method: A structure supporting expertise in social welfare services. In E. Marthinssen & I. Julkunen (Eds.), Critical studies in socio-critical diversity: Vol. 1 Practice research in Nordic social work: Knowledge production in transition (pp. 117–148). London, England: Whiting & Birch.
  • Yliruka, L. (2015). Itsearviointi reflektiivisenä rakenteena: Kuvastin-menetelmän toimivuus, käyttöönotto ja kehittäminen [Self-evaluation as a reflective structure: Workability, adaptation and development of the Mirror Method]. Heikki Waris Research Reports 1. Helsinki, Finland: Unigrafia.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.