Introducing Social Work to HyFlex Blended Learning: A Student-centered Approach

References

• Abdelmalak, M. (2014, March). Towards flexible learning for adult students: HyFlex design. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 706–712). Jacksonville, Florida: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. (2006, October). Designing the hyFlex world - hybrid, flexible courses for all students. Paper presented at Association for Educational Communication and Technology International Conference, Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. (2007, June). Transitioning to an online world: Using HyFlex courses to bridge the gap. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 2701–2706). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. (2010). Hybrid courses with flexible participation – the HyFlex design. Draft v2.2. Retrieved from http://itec.sfsu.edu/hyflex/hyflex_course_design_theory_2.2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. (2014). Hybrid courses with flexible participation: The HyFlex course design. In L. Kyei-Blankson & E. Ntuli (Eds.), Practical applications and experiences in K-20 blended learning environments (pp. 153–177). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. doi:10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2005). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. L., & Mathews, D. A. (2013). A comparison of student knowledge and attitude toward research: Are main campus students different from those in a hybrid environment? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4–5), 467–480. doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.828668
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., Davis, M., Phelan, A., & Hanley, D. (2018). Dealing with the learning needs of child welfare social and health care workers: an interdisciplinary approach to blended learning with part time students. Social Work Education, 37(6), 746–760. doi:10.1080/02615479.2018.1479384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., Melton, M., & Price, E. (2015). Learning while earning: The new normal. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved from https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/Working-Learners-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carter, I., Damianakis, T., Munro, S., Skinner, H., Matin, S., & Nash Andrews, T. (2018). Exploring online and blended course delivery in social group work. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 38(5), 486–503. doi:10.1080/08841233.2018.1523824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 236–241. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. J. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzman, P. A., & Maiden, R. P. (Eds.). (2014). Distance learning and online education in social work. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kyei-Blankson, L., & Godwyll, F. (2010, October). An examination of learning outcomes in HyFlex learning environments. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), E-Learn: World conference on E-Learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 532–535). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Kyei-Blankson, L., Godwyll, F., Nur-Awaleh, M., & Keengwe, J. (2011, March). The New Blend: When students are given the option to choose. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 433–436). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Kyei-Blankson, L., Godwyll, F., & Nur-Awaleh, M. A. (2014). Innovative blended delivery and learning: exploring student choice, experience, and level of satisfaction in a hyflex course. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 16(3), 243–252. doi:10.1504/IJIL.2014.064728
   Google Scholar
• Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Pascot, D. (2014). Academic students’ satisfaction and learning outcomes in a HyFlex course: Do delivery modes matter?. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), E-Learn: World conference on E-Learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 1075–1083). New Orleans, LA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S., Fulginiti, A., & Moore, B. (2018). The perceived effectiveness of online social work education: insights from a national survey of social work educators. Social Work Education, 37(6), 775–789. doi:10.1080/02615479.2018.1482864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S., Whitsett, D., & Wood, G. (2013). Teaching MSW social work practice in a blended online learning environment. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4–5), 408–420. doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.829168
   Google Scholar
• Ma’arop, A. H., & Embi, M. A. (2016). Implementation of blended learning in higher learning institutions: A review of literature. International Education Studies, 9(3), 41. doi:10.5539/ies.v9n3p41
   Google Scholar
• McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Risser, M., & Griffiths, R. (2013). Student choice, instructor flexibility: Moving beyond the blended instructional model. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 1(1), 8–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pelech, W., Wulff, D., Perrault, E., Ayala, J., Baynton, M., Williams, M., … Shankar, J. (2013). Current challenges in social work distance education: Responses from the Elluminati. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4–5), 393–407. doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.834863
   Google Scholar
• Racovita-Szilagyi, L., Carbonero Muñoz, D., & Diaconu, M. (2018). Challenges and opportunities to eLearning in social work education: perspectives from Spain and the United States. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 1–14. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1461066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Keyes, E., & Schneider, D. (2013). Cultivating curiosity: Integrating hybrid teaching in courses in human behavior in the social environment. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(3), 227–238. doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.796304
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/192/274.
   Google Scholar
• Stotzer, R. L., Fujikawa, K., Sur, J., & Arnsberger, P. (2013). Cost analysis of a distance education MSW program. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4–5), 357–368. doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.826318
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. (2016). The HyFlex course design: A case study on adult and career education courses. National Social Science Journal, 48(2), 88–93.
   Google Scholar