References
- Bauer & Barrett-Greenly. (n.d.) Checklists and rubrics, para 2. Retrieved from https://topkit.org/developing/checklists-rubrics/
- Bertera, E., & Littlefield, M. (2003). Evaluation of electronic discussion forums in social work diversity education: A comparison of anonymous and identified participation. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 21(4), 53–72. doi:10.1300/J017v21n04_04
- Blackboard, Inc. (n.d.) Exemplary course program. Retrieved from https://community.blackboard.com/community/ecp/pages/program-volunteer-reviewer-information
- CSWE. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards educational policy and accreditation standards for baccalaureate and master’s social work programs. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-EPAS
- CSWE. (n.d.) Online and distance education offerings by accredited programs. Retrieved from https://cswe.org/Accreditation/Directory-of-Accredited-Programs/Online-and-Distance-Education
- Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education. Retrieved from http://www.ihep.org/sites/default/files/uploads/docs/pubs/qualityontheline.pdf
- Littlefield, M. B., & Bertera, E. M. (2005). A discourse analysis of online dialogs in social work diversity courses: Topical themes, depth and tone. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(3/4), 131–146. doi:10.1300/J067v24n03_09
- Littlefield, M. B., & Roberson, K. C. (2005). Computer Technology for the Feminist Classroom. Affilia, 20(2), 186–202. doi:10.1177/0886109905274676
- Maidment, J. (2005). Teaching social work online: Dilemmas and debates. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 24(2), 184–195. doi:10.1080/0261547052000333126
- Maryland Online. (2016/2018a). Why QM? Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/why-quality-matters/
- Maryland Online. (2016/2018b). Course design rubric standards. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/higher-ed-rubric
- Maryland Online. (2016/2018c). Why QM? Process. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/why-quality-matters/process
- Moore, S. E., Golder, S., Sterrett, E., Faul, A. C., Yankeelov, P., Weathers Mathis, L., & Barbee, A. P. (2015). Social work online education: A model for getting started and staying connected. Journal of Social Work Education, 51, 508–518. doi:10.1080/10437797.2015.1043200
- Online Learning Consortium. (2014, July 7). The sloan consortium changes name to ‘online learning consortium’ [Press Release] Retrieved from https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/olc-quality-scorecard-history/
- Online Learning Consortium. (2019). OLC quality scorecard suite: A mandate for quality, para. 2. Retrieved from https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/olc-quality-scorecard-history/
- Reamer, F. (2013). Distance and online social work education: Novel ethical challenges. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 43(4/5), 369–384. doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.828669
- Roblyer, M. D., & Wiencke, W. R. (2003). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 77–98. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1702_2
- Shattuck, K. (2015). Focusing research on quality matters. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(3), 155–158. doi:10.1080/08923647.2015.1061809
- Shelton, K. (2010). A quality scorecard for the administration of online education programs. Online Learning, 14(4). doi:10.24059/olj.v14i4.163
- Vernon, R., Vakalahi, H., Pierce, D., Pittman-Munke, D., & Frantz-Adkins, L. (2009). Distance education programs in social work. Emerging trends. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 263–276. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700081
- Woods, D. (2017, December 17). About the exemplary course program. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://community.blackboard.com/community/ecp/blog/2017/12/27/about-the-exemplary-course-program