Embracing online education: exploring options for success

References

• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. doi: 10.1287/isre.9.2.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy – An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418–430. doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card – Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos 22 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Aypay, A., Celik, H. C., Aypay, A., & Sever, M. (2012). Technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers in Turkey. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 264–272.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. doi: 10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Balaji, M. S, Roy, S. K., & Sadeque, S. (2016). Antecedents and consequences of university brand identification. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3023–3032. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, J. L.-H. (2009). The process of customer engagement: A conceptual framework. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(1), 63–74. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679170105
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, D., Shepherd, C. D., Humphreys, M., & Ziebell, M. (2011). To be or not to be: That isn’t the question! An empirical look at online versus traditional brick-and-mortar courses at the university level. Marketing Education Review, 21(3), 241–250. doi: 10.2753/MER1052-8008210304
   Google Scholar
• Burnkrant, R. E., & Page, T. J. (1982). An examination of the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of Fishbein’s behavioral intention model. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 550–561. doi: 10.2307/3151726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casidy, R. (2014). Brand orientation and service quality in online and offline environments: Empirical examination in higher education. Services Marketing Quarterly, 35(3), 236–254. doi: 10.1080/15332969.2014.916143
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. doi: 10.2307/3150876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, G. A., Jr. & Peter, J. P. (1984). Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(4), 360–375. doi: 10.2307/3151463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–322. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake-Bridges, E., Strelzoff, A., & Sulbaran, T. (2011). Teaching marketing through a micro-economy in virtual reality. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(3), 295–311. doi: 10.1177/0273475311420236
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388. doi: 10.2307/3150980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T., Barker, M., & Graham, P. (1999). Measuring communication impact for university advertising materials. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(2), 73–79. doi: 10.1108/13563289910268106
   Google Scholar
• Gopala, G., Paswan, A., & Qin, S. (2015). Are face-to-face classes more effective than online classes? An empirical examination. Marketing Education Review, 25(2), 67–81. doi: 10.1080/10528008.2015.1029851
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23(4), 519–529. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1040.0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, X., Zhu, Y., & Guo, X. (2013). Meeting the ‘digital natives’: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 392–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghshenas, H., Chatroudi, E. A., & Njeje, F. A. (2012). Does educational level matter in adopting online education? A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(1), 117–151. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2012.705798
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr. Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 657–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miniard, P. W., & Cohen, J. B. (1979). Isolating attitudinal and normative influences in behavioral intentions models. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 102–110. doi: 10.2307/3150881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318–332. doi: 10.2307/3150973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A., Koenig-Lewis, N., & Asaad, Y. (2016). Brand identification in higher education: A conditional process analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3033–3040. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Jr. (2006). Moving beyond adoption: Exploring the determinants of student intention to use technology. Marketing Education Review, 16(2), 79–88. doi: 10.1080/10528008.2006.11488962
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Jr. Marshall, G. W., & Stamps, M. B. (2005). Sales force use of technology: Antecedents to technology acceptance. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1623–1631. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, R., Roper, S., & Lettice, F. (2016). The adoption of information technology in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4), 3096–3104.
   Google Scholar
• Schillewaert, N., Ahearne, M. J., Frambach, R. T., & Moenaert, R. K. (2005). The adoption of information technology in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4), 323–336. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, S. D., Weathers, D., & Niedrich, R. W. (2008). Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed likert items. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 116–131. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.45.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2013). User acceptance towards web-based learning systems: Investigating the role of social, organizational and individual factors in European higher education. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.026
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewe, P. L. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26, 381–396. doi: 10.2307/4132314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. L., & Omar, M. (2014). Applying brand management to higher education through the use of the Brand Flux Model – The case of Arcadia University. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 24(2), 222–242. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2014.973471
   Google Scholar