Considering the marketing of higher education: the role of student learning gain as a potential indicator of teaching quality

References

• Ashwin, P. (2015, December 21). A response to the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Lancaster: Lancaster University Blog. Retrieved from www.lancaster.ac.uk/educational-research/news-and-events/blog/paul-ashwin/a-response-to-the-green-paper/
   Google Scholar
• Association of Heads of University Administration. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Manchester: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., & Ali-Choudhury, R. (2009). Prospective students’ perceptions of university brands: An empirical study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19(1), 85–107. doi: 10.1080/08841240902905445
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. (2007). Integrating research and teaching: Understanding excellence. In A. Skelton (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching excellence in higher education: Improving knowledge and practice (pp. 74–88). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, D., & Schneider, K. (2002). Collegiate student orientation scale (CSOS): Application of the marketing concept to higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(2), 15–34. Database: Education Source. doi: 10.1300/J050v12n02_02
   Google Scholar
• British International Studies Association. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Aberystwyth: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of the Association of National Teaching Fellows. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of University Chairs. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Bristol: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Competition & Markets Authority. (2016). An open letter to higher education providers following the CMA’s review of compliance with consumer protection law in the sector. London: Author. Retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/540253/higher-education-compliance-review-open-letter-to-providers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Confederation of British Industry. (2015). Inspiring growth. CBI/Pearson education and skills survey 2015. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Defence of British Universities. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society. Report of the National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education. London: HMSO. Retrieved from www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2015a). Fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2015b). Graduate labour market statistics January-­March Q1 2015. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2015c). Graduate labour market statistics April-­June Q2 2015. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2016). Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Durham University. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Durham: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Engineering Employers Federation. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Birmingham: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Engineering Professors’ Council. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Godalming: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith’s – University of London. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, V., & Fisk, A. (2013). Considering teaching excellence in higher education: 2007–2013. A literature review since the CHERI report 2007. The Higher Education Academy (HEA) Research Series. York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The Higher Education Academy. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2015). National student survey summary data for 2015. London: Author. Retrieved from www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/2015/
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Policy Institute. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Oxford: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2015). Destinations of leavers from higher education in the United Kingdom for the academic year 2013/14. Cheltenham: Author. Retrieved from www.hesa.ac.uk/sfr217
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Southend-on-Sea: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B. (2003). Marketisation in higher education, Clark’s triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 110–135. doi: 10.1111/1468-2273.00238
   Google Scholar
• Kings College London. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). Maldon: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McGettigan, A. (2013). The great university gamble: Money, markets and the future of higher education. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, C., Guerin, B., Harte, E., Frearson, M., & Manville, C. (2015). Hefce report – learning gain in higher education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Molesworth, M., Scullion, R., & Nixon, E. (2010). The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Union of Students. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nedbalova, E., Greenacre, L., & Schulz, J. (2014). Uk higher education viewed through the marketization and marketing lenses. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 24(2), 178–195. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2014.973472
   Google Scholar
• Ng, I., & Forbes, J. (2009). Education as service: The understanding of university experience through the service logic. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19(1), 38–64. doi: 10.1080/08841240902904703
   Google Scholar
• Oxford University Student Union. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Oxford: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Palfreymam, D., & Tapper, T. (2016). The marketization of English higher education and the financing of tuition fees. Review of Education, 14(1), 47–55. doi: 10.18546/LRE.14.1.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, M., & Arnold, A. (2014). A six step guide to using recursive abstraction applied to the qualitative analysis of interview data. Poole: Bournemouth University.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, M. (2015). Two blue hats student guide to analysing qualitative interview data using recursive abstraction. Poole: Kindle Direct Publishing in Association with Two Blue Hats.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, M., & Roushan, G. (2017, June 13). Assessing student learning: A comparison of existing methods for evaluating the learning gain of students. Poster presented at the 2017 CELebrate Regional Teaching and Learning Conference, Bournemouth University. Retrieved June 28, 2017, from http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29220/
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, M., Roushan, G., & Taylor, J. (2017, May 11). Evaluating student learning gain: An alternative perspective. Poster presented at the 2017 HEA Surveys Conference, Manchester. Retrieved June 28, 2017, from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/evaluating-student-learning-gain-alternative-perspective-hea-surveys-conference-2017
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Gloucester: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., & Sykes, A. (2014). Listening to students’ views on NSS data for quality enhancement. Journal of Health and Social Care Education, 3(1), 35–40. doi: 10.11120/hsce.2013.00035
   Google Scholar
• Royal Academy of Engineering. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Geographical Society. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Historical Society. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Holloway – University of London. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society of Chemistry. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Russell Group. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Cambridge: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business studies students (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (2015, November 2). Three reasons why the teaching excellence framework won’t work. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/nov/02/why-teaching-excellence-framework-tef-metrics-university-fees
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (2005). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. In Talk delivered at the Math Science Partnerships (MSP) workshop: ‘Teacher education for effective teaching and learning’ hosted by the National Research Council’s Center for Education. Retrieved from http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/10531
   Google Scholar
• Times Higher Education. (2017). Teaching excellence framework (TEF) results 2017. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/teaching-excellence-framework-tef-results-2017
   Google Scholar
• Universities UK. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• University Alliance. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• University College London. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• University of Brighton. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Brighton: Author.
   Google Scholar
• University of Cambridge. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Cambridge: Author.
   Google Scholar
• University of Oxford. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Oxford: Author.
   Google Scholar
• University of Southampton. (2016). Consultation response on the higher education green paper – fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Southampton: Author.
   Google Scholar