Personalizing twitter communication: an evaluation of ‘rotation-curation’ for enhancing social media engagement within higher education

References

• Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Priego, E. (2014). Opening teaching landscapes: The importance of quality assurance in the delivery of open educational resources. Open Praxis, 6(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.81
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id = 2584525
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2009). Code of ethics and conduct. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2013). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. British Psychological Society. Retrieved from https://doi.org/INF206/1.2013
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Moe, H. (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society. New York: Peter Lang. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/66324/
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. (2013). @ Sweden: Curating a nation on Twitter. Popular Communication, 11(1), 30–46. doi: 10.1080/15405702.2013.751855
   Google Scholar
• Condie, J., & Cooper, A. (2014). We are all@ salfordpsych the rotation curation approach and twitter as a learning tool in higher education. Retrieved from http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/33395
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides, E., & Zinck Stagno, M. C. (2011). Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: A segmentation study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2011.573593
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., & Condie, J. (2016). Bakhtin, digital scholarship and new publishing practices as carnival. Journal of Applied Social Theory, 1(1), 26–43. Retrieved from http://socialtheoryapplied.com/journal/jast/article/view/31
   Google Scholar
• Costa, C. (2014a). Double gamers: Academics between fields. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2014.982861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, C. (2014b). Outcasts on the inside: Academics reinventing themselves online. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2014.985752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAndrea, D., Ellison, N., LaRose, R., Steinfield, C., & Fiore, A. (2012). Serious social media: On the use of social media for improving students’ adjustment to college. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhir, A., Buragga, K., & Boreqqah, A. (2013). Tweeters on campus: Twitter a learning tool in classroom? Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(5), 672–691. doi: 10.3217/jucs-019-05-0672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erskine, M., Fustos, M., McDaniel, A., & Watkins, D. (2014). Social media in higher education: Exploring content guidelines and policy using a grounded theory approach. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi = 10.1.1.842.4006&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fagerstrøm, A., & Ghinea, G. (2013). Co-creation of value in higher education: Using social network marketing in the recruitment of students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 45–53. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.748524
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2016). Social media, professionalism and higher education: A sociomaterial consideration. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 664–677. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.942275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. (2014). Social media as a tool for increased student participation and engagement outside the classroom in higher education. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 2(3), 16–24. doi: 10.14297/jpaap.v2i3.113
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, K., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1027–1042. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JISC. (2015). UK higher education social media influencers named. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/blog/uk-higher-education-social-media-influencers-named-05-oct-2015
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, C. G., & Kaye, L. K. (2014). “To tweet or not to tweet?” A comparison of academics’ and students’ usage of Twitter in academic contexts. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.928229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krachenberg, A. (1972). Bringing the concept of marketing to higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 43(5), 369–380. doi: 10.2307/1980714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzma, J., & Wright, W. (2013). Using social networks as a catalyst for change in global higher education marketing and recruiting. Journal of Continuing Engineering Education, 23(1), 53–66. doi: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2013.051766
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T., Marginson, S., & Snyder, I. (2005). The network university? Technology, culture and organisational complexity in contemporary higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(1), 56–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2005.00281.x
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B., & Rush, D. (2013). Experience of developing twitter-based communities of practice in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 21(1), 1–13. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v21i0.18598
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2014). “Feeling better connected”: academics’ use of social media. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/research/feeling-better-connected-academics-use-social-media
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, T. (2012). Don’t affect the share price’’: social media policy in higher education as reputation management. Research in Learning Technology. Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/19194
   Google Scholar
• Mewburn, I., & Thomson, P. (2013). Why do academics blog? An analysis of audiences, purposes and challenges. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1105–1119. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.835624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaei, A., Siuki, E., Gray, D., & Johnson, L. (2016). Brand associations in the higher education sector: The difference between shared and owned associations. Journal of Brand Management, 23(4), 419–438. doi: 10.1057/bm.2016.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, D., & Bowman, S. A. (2014). Big data solutions on a small scale: Evaluating accessible high-performance computing for social research. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2053951714559105
   Google Scholar
• Neier, S., & Zayer, L. T. (2015). Students’ perceptions and experiences of social media in higher education. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 133–143. doi: 10.1177/0273475315583748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. (2014). Characterizing Twitter communication–a case study of international engineering academic units. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 24(2), 257–273. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2014.907220
   Google Scholar
• Rise. (2015). Top 100 UK Universities on Social Media. Retrieved from https://www.rise.global/top-uk-universities
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., & Russell, B. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183–195. doi: 10.1087/20110306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, R., Roper, S., & Lettice, F. (2016). Social media interaction, the university brand and recruitment performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3096–3104. doi:10.1087/20110306 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, R. (2013). Who is following us? Data mining a library’s Twitter followers. Library Hi Tech, 31(1), 160–170. doi: 10.1108/07378831311303994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, R. (2016). Following the leader? Network models of “world-class” universities on Twitter. Higher Education, 71(2), 253–268. doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9900-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, I., Marginson, S., & Lewis, T. (2007). “An alignment of the planets”: mapping the intersections between pedagogy, technology and management in Australian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(2), 187–202. doi: 10.1080/13600800701351769
   Google Scholar
• Stephansen, H. C., & Couldry, N. (2014). Understanding micro-processes of community building and mutual learning on Twitter: A ‘small data’approach. Information, Communication & Society, 17(10), 1212–1227. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.902984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• theunipod. (2013). theunipod Social Media Rankings 2013. Retrieved from http://www.theunipod.com/making-your-choice/university-rankings/social-media-rankings
   Google Scholar
• University of Salford. (2015). Salford University is among the most influential on social media in the UK. Retrieved from http://www.salford.ac.uk/news1/salford-a-top-10-university-for-social-media
   Google Scholar
• VandenBroek, A. (2015). Tweeting Sweden: Technological solutionism,# RotationCuration, and the world’s most democratic Twitter account. Interface, 1(1), 1–37. doi: 10.7710/2373-4914.1004
   Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2016). Scholars in an increasingly open and digital world: How do education professors and students use Twitter? The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar