533
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Digital technology and eWOM in the context of higher education: a study from Portugal and Spain

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 159-178 | Received 25 Apr 2019, Accepted 05 Sep 2020, Published online: 04 Nov 2020

References

  • Abney, A. K., Pelletier, M. J., Ford, T.-R. S., & Horky, A. B. (2017). #IHateYourBrand: Adaptive service recovery strategies on Twitter. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2016-0079
  • Abrantes, J. L., Seabra, C., & Lages, L. F. (2007). Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 960–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.026
  • Ackerman, D., & Chung, C. (2018). Is RateMyProfessors.com Unbiased? A look at the impact of social Modelling on student online Reviews of marketing classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475317735654
  • Avidov-Ungar, O., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2018). Professional identity of teacher educators in the digital era in light of demands of pedagogical innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.017
  • Bal, A. S., Grewal, D., Mills, A., & Ottley, G. (2015). Engaging students With social media. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315593380
  • Bernard, Z. (2017). Here’s how technology is shaping the future of education. https://www.businessinsider.com/how-technology-is-shaping-the-future-of-education-2017-12
  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2012). Race Against the machine: How the digital revolution is Accelerating innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly transforming Employment and the Economy. Digital Frontier Press.
  • Carvalho, L., Brandão, A., & Pinto, L. H. (2020). Understanding the importance of eWOM on higher education institutions’ brand equity. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1788196
  • Cownie, F. (2017). Gratitude and its drivers within higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(2), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1389795
  • Daly, A., Baron, S., Dorsch, M., Fisk, R., Grove, S., Harris, K., & Harris, R. (2014). Bridging the academia-practitioner divide: The case of “service theater”. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(7), 580–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-05-2013-0105
  • Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2018). Just plain peers across social networks: Peer-feedback networks nested in personal and academic networks in higher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.02.002
  • Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q., & Wahl, S. T. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated Word-of-Mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 56(3), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701236866
  • Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Shaver, C., & Oaks, M. (2009). Computer-Mediated Word-of-Mouth communication on RateMyProfessors.com: Expectancy effects on student cognitive and behavioral learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01445.x
  • Engelland, B. T., Workman, L., & Singh, M. (2000). Ensuring service quality for campus career services centers: A modified SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(3), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475300223007
  • Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, Family, and community Partnerships: Preparing educators and Improving schools. Taylor & Francis.
  • Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  • Gray, D. M., Peltier, J. W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2012). The journal of marketing education: Past, present, and future. Journal of Marketing Education, 34(3), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475312458676
  • Grewal, D., Motyka, S., & Levy, M. (2018). The Evolution and future of retailing and retailing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318755838
  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
  • Herold, K., Sipilä, J., Tarkiainen, A., & Sundqvist, S. (2017). How service values influence the processing of word-of-mouth in the evaluation of credence beliefs. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.1213347
  • Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications.
  • Hutton, P. A. (2006). Understanding student Cheating and what educators can do about it. College Teaching, 54(1), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.171-176
  • Isaac, S., Le Duc, I., Hardebolle, C., & Tormey, R. (2018). Training and development needs for a 21st century academic. In C. Broughan, G. Steventon, & L. Clouder (Eds.), Global Perspectives on teaching excellence (pp. 140–151). Routledge.
  • Ismagilova, E., Dwivedi, Y. K., Slade, E., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the marketing context: A state of the Art analysis and future directions. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
  • Javalgi, R. G., Benoy Joseph, W., & LaRosa, R. J. (2009). Cross-cultural marketing strategies for delivering knowledge-based services in a borderless world: The case of management education. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(6), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040910985852
  • Kardaras, N. (2016). Glow Kids: How screen addiction is hijacking our kids-and how to break the Trance. St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
  • Kerawalla, L., Petrou, M., & Scanlon, E. (2013). Talk Factory: Supporting ‘exploratory talk’ around an interactive whiteboard in primary school science plenaries. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.745049
  • Khoo-Lattimore, C., Mura, P., & Yung, R. (2019). The time has come: A systematic literature review of mixed methods research in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(13), 1531–1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1406900
  • Konjalić, N., Jefić, B., & Fodolović, A. (2018). Efficiency of mobile learning in processes of formal and informal education. International Journal of Management Cases, 20(2), 69–84.
  • Lee, N. M., & Merle, P. F. (2018). Media relations and universities: An assessment of digital newsrooms. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1467991
  • Lowe, B., & Laffey, D. (2011). Is Twitter for the Birds?:Using Twitter to enhance student learning in a marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475311410851
  • Ma, J., & Zhou, D. (2000). Fuzzy set approach to the assessment of student-centered learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1109/13.848079
  • Marks, R. B. (2000). Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475300222005
  • McCoy, B. (2016). Digital distractions in the classroom phase II: Student classroom use of digital devices for non–class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 7(1), 5–32. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismfacpub/90/
  • Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
  • Neier, S., & Zayer, L. T. (2015). Students’ perceptions and experiences of social media in higher education. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315583748
  • Paswan, A. K., & Young, J. A. (2002). Student evaluation of instructor: A Nomological Investigation using Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(3), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475302238042
  • Peruta, A., & Shields, A. B. (2018). Marketing your university on social media: A content analysis of Facebook post types and formats. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1442896
  • Pöntinen, S., Dillon, P., & Väisänen, P. (2017). Student teachers’ discourse about digital technologies and transitions between formal and informal learning contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9450-0
  • Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003
  • Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Reiter, B. (2017). Theory and methodology of exploratory social science research. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology, 5(4), 129. http://ijsrm.humanjournals.com/theory-and-methodology-of-exploratory-social-science-research/
  • Rouse, M. (2013). “Definition: social network”, available at: https://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/social-network (accessed at 1 October 2018)
  • Santini, F. D. O., Ladeira, W. J., Sampaio, C. H., & da Silva Costa, G. (2017). Student satisfaction in higher education: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1311980
  • Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences. A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  • Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229
  • Sembroiz, D., Ricciardi, S., & Careglio, D. (2018). Chapter 10 - A Novel Cloud-based IoT Architecture for Smart Building Automation. In M. Ficco, & F. Palmieri (Eds.), Security and Resilience in Intelligent data-Centric Systems and communication networks (pp. 215–233). Academic Press.
  • Tingting, Z., Behzad, A. O., & Cihan, C. (2017). Generation Y’s positive and negative eWOM: Use of social media and mobile technology. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 732–761. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0611
  • Valdez, F., D, A., & Valdez Cervantes, A. (2018). Retailing laboratory: Delivering skills through Experiential learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475317753679
  • Veal, A. J. (2017). Research methods for Leisure and Tourism: A practical Guide (5th ed). Pearson Education.
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge University Press.
  • West, B., Moore, H., & Barry, B. (2015). Beyond the Tweet:Using Twitter to enhance engagement, learning, and Success Among first-year students. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315586061
  • Young, M. R., Klemz, B. R., & Murphy, J. W. (2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of Instructional technology, learning Styles, Instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475303254004
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.