300
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Higher education and ‘marketization of intellect’: university admission advertisements from a genre perspective

ORCID Icon &
Received 07 Jul 2021, Accepted 02 Jul 2023, Published online: 11 Jul 2023

References

  • Admissions ads in Pakistan newspapers as advertisement notices. (2015). Retrieved on December 22, 2015, from http://admissionads.pk/.
  • Admissions in Pakistan at university, college and school – newspaper ads. (2015). November 15, 2015, from http://scanjobs.net/admissions/index.php.
  • Ahmad, N. N., & Masroor, F. (2020). The study of generic patterns of mission and vision statements of the universities. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/4.2.13
  • Ahmad, U. K. (1997). Scientific research articles in Malay: A situated discourse analysis [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, UMI.
  • Aib, I., & Shehzad, W. (2022). Defining mission statements in higher education: Towards a genre perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12378
  • Ali, S. S., Amin, T., & Shahid, M. (2020). Website homepages of private universities of Pakistan serving as bait for prospective students: A critical discourse analysis. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 4(3), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2020(4-III)14
  • All about education in Pakistan. (2015). Retrieved on November 22, 2015, from http://www.eduvision.edu.pk/admissions.php.
  • Al-Qahtani, A. (2021). Website representations of Saudi universities in Makkah Region: A critical discourse analysis approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1895463. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1895463
  • Anctil, E. J. (2008). Selling higher education: Marketing and advertising America’s colleges and universities. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(2), 1–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3402
  • Arshad, M. (2017). The marketization higher education in Pakistan; a critical analysis of Pakistani print media discourse. Hayatian Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(1), 37–64. http://uog.edu.pk/downloads/journal/HJLL/I/3.pdf.
  • Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres the international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082576
  • Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied linguistics, 22(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195
  • Bano, Z., & Shakir, A. (2015). Personal pronouns in about US section of online university prospectus. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 133–139.
  • Barton, S. W. (2021). Niche marketing as a valuable strategy to grow enrollment at an institution of higher education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 77(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2021.1925826
  • Beamer, S. A. (2011). Private vs. public higher education budgeting. Planning for Higher Education, 40(1), 7.
  • Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional setting. Longman.
  • Bhatia, V. K. (1996). Methodological issues in genre analysis. Hermes Journal of Linguistics, 16, 39–59. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v9i16.25383
  • Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7
  • Bhatia, V. K. (2001). Analysing genre: Some conceptual issues. In M. Hewing (Ed.), Academic Writing Context: Implications and applications: Papers in honour of Tony Dudley-Evans (pp. 79–92). Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.
  • Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum.
  • Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Routledge.
  • Bradley, J. (2018). Integrity in higher education marketing and misleading claims in the university prospectus: what happened next … and is it enough? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0026-9
  • Büyükdoğan, B., & Gedik, H. (2017). The using of websites of the universities for prospectives students for purpose of institutional promotion [Paper presentation]. The International Social Sciences Congress, Hopa, Turkey. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12498/1646.
  • Chaiyasuk, I. (2007). A critical description of the persuasive discourse of British and Thai university web pages [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Chapleo, C. (2011). Exploring rationales for branding a university: Should we be seeking to measure branding in UK universities? Journal of Brand Management, 18(6), 411–422.
  • Chapleo, C., & O’Sullivan, H. (2017). Contemporary thought in higher education marketing.
  • Coffield, F., & Williamson, B. (1997). Repositioning higher education. Society for Research into Higher Education.
  • Connell, I., & Galasi’nski, D. (1998). Academic mission statements: An exercise in negotiation. Discourse & Society, 9(4), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009004003
  • Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00026-4
  • Connor, U., & Upton, T. (2004). The genre of grant proposals: A corpus linguistic analysis. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics (pp. 235–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Constantinides, E., & Stagno, M. C. Z. (2012). Higher education marketing: A study on the impact of social media on study selection and university choice. International journal of technology and educational marketing (IJTEM), 2(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtem.2012010104
  • Cook, G. (1992). The discourse of advertising. Routledge.
  • Cordelier, B., Vasquez, C., & Viviane, S. (2021). Branding the university: Building up meaning through ideological oppositions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 31(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1761507
  • Crossley, S. (2007). A chronotopic approach to genre analysis: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.10.004
  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of “new managerialism” in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980500117827
  • dos Santos, V. B. M. P. (2002). Genre analysis of business letters of negotiation. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00028-4
  • Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 133–168. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002002
  • Featherstone, M. (1991). Consumer culture and postmodernism. Sage Publications.
  • Foskett, N. (2011). Markets, government, funding and the marketisation of UK higher education. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as a consumer (pp. 25–38). Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. Penguin.
  • Garland, C. (2019). The McDonaldization of higher education? Notes on the UK experience. Fast Capitalism, 4(1), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.200801.011
  • Groccia, J. E. (1997). The student as customer versus the student as learner. About Campus, 2(2), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/108648229700200209
  • Haas, E., & Fischman, G. (2010). Nostalgia, entrepreneurship, and redemption: Understanding prototypes in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 532–562. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209359419
  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, vol. 1. Heinemann.
  • Han, Z. (2014). The marketization of public discourse: The Chinese universities. Discourse & Communication, 8(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313503221
  • Hanung, B. (2013). Genre analysis of Stanford University brochures [Unpublished Bachelor of Literature Dissertation]. Dian Nuswantoro. University, Semarang, Indonesia.
  • Higher Education Commission, Pakistan. (2015). Recognised universities. Retrieved on December 20, 2015, from http://www.hec.gov.pk/english/universities/pages/recognised.aspx.
  • Huggins, R., Jones, M., & Upton, S. (2008). Universities as drivers of knowledge-based regional development: A triple helix analysis of Wales. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2008.016858
  • Johnson, H. (2001). Neutral, colluding or subversive? Recognizing the political implications of the marketing subdiscourses in English higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 29(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211x010293002
  • Kango, U., Kartiko, A., & Maarif, M. A. (2021). The effect of promotion on the decision to choose a higher education through the brand image of education. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1611–1621. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.852
  • Khalid, M. (2016). Study report: Overall assessment of the higher education sector. Higher Education Commission Pakistan. http://hec.gov.pk/english/universities/projects/TESP/Documents/FR-Assessment20HE20Sector.pdf.
  • Kheovichai, B. (2013). Marketization in the language of UK university recruitment: A critical discourse analysis and corpus comparison of university and finance industry job advertisements [Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham]. Language Studies Unit, The University of Aston in Birmingham.
  • Kwong, J. (2000). Introduction: Marketization and privatization in education. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(99)00060-7
  • Lien, Y. L., & Lang, H. L. (2008). A corpus-based genre analysis of English tourism brochures. In The 3rd International Conference on English Education, Taipei, Shih Chien University, Taiwan.
  • Luo, J., & Huang, T. (2015). Genre-based analysis of American tourism brochure. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3(09), 200. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2015.39028
  • Martín, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00033-3
  • Masroor, F. (2013). Argumentative strategies of newspaper editorials in English across cultures. The Asian ESP Journal, 9(2), 34–72.
  • Masroor, F., & Ahmad, U. K. (2017). Directives in English language newspaper editorials across cultures. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.09.009
  • Mautner, G. (2005). The entrepreneurial university. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283540
  • Nawaz, N., & Shakir, A. (2014). Significance of non-narrative features in online university prospectus of pakistan: A corpus-based investigation. Significance. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(19), 128–138.
  • Ngo, J., & Ismandoyo, D. A. (2018). Higher education: The impacts of educational brand on students’ decision to enroll through advertising brochures for higher education institutions in surabaya Indonesia. In A. Papadimitriou (Ed.), Competition in higher education branding and marketing: National and Global Perspectives (pp. 143–157). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nguyen, T. P. H. (2011). A discourse analysis of job advertisements in English and Vietnamese [Doctoral Dissertation].
  • Oke, F. B., & Olajimbiti, E. O. (2021). The pragmatics of promotional features and discourse strategies in postgraduate school prospectus in Nigeria. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 32(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.15290/CR.2021.32.1.01
  • Önder, N. (2013). Generic structure and promotional elements in best-selling online book blurbs: A cross-cultural study. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos (AELFE), 25, 171–194.
  • Osman, H. (2006). An investigation of socio-cognitive strategies in university brochures. ESP Malaysia, 12, 39–51.
  • Osman, H. (2008). Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: A genre perspective. Discourse & Communication, 2(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307085577
  • Osman, H. (2013). Pedagogic genre analysis: A module for copy-writing. English for Specific Purposes World, 13(37), 1–29.
  • Papadimitriou, A. (Ed.). (2017). Competition in higher education branding and marketing: National and global perspectives. Springer.
  • Peruta, A., & Shields, A. B. (2018). Marketing your university on social media: A content analysis of Facebook post types and formats. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1442896
  • Pizarro Milian, R., & Quirke, L. (2017). Alternative pathways to legitimacy: Promotional practices in the Ontario for-profit college sector. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.1212450
  • Polkinghorne, M., Roushan, G., & Taylor, J. (2017). Considering the marketing of higher education: The role of student learning gain as a potential indicator of teaching quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1380741
  • Räsänen, I. (2013). Adjectives in job advertisements in English in Helsingin Sanomat: a semantic analysis (Bachelor’s Thesis. Iida Räsänen. University of Jyväskylä).
  • Rosyidah, N., & Rosyidi, U. (2020). Internationalization in higher education: University’s effective promotion strategies in building international trust. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.351
  • Rouse, W. B., Lombardi, J. V., & Craig, D. D. (2018). Modelling research universities: Predicting probable futures of public vs. private and large vs. small research universities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(50), 12582–12589. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807174115
  • Rutter, R., Lettice, F., & Nadeau, J. (2017). Brand personality in higher education: Anthropomorphized university marketing communications. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.1213346
  • Sadeghi, V., & Samuel, M. (2013). Genre analysis of the letters of appeal. Discourse Studies, 15(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612471467
  • Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
  • Sauntson, H., & Morrish, L. (2011). Vision, values and international excellence: The products that university mission statements sell to students. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer (pp. 73–85). Routledge.
  • Shahnaz, A. (2021). Marketisation of higher education: A genre analysis of university prospectuses in Pakistan. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(3), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12334
  • Shahnaz, A., Fatima, S. T., & Qadir, S. A. (2020). Education for sale: The identity construction of university and students new age university prospectuses. Higher Education Policy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00212-y
  • Sinraksa, D. (2009). A genre-based approach to ‘describing the attraction’ move in tourist leaflets of TAT. Master’s project, M.A. (English). Bangkok: Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University.
  • Slater, K. (2010). Commercities? A corpus-driven analysis of the marketization of British universities [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. The University of Birmingham.
  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
  • Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  • Upton, T. A., & Connor, U. (2001). Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 20(4), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00022-3
  • Uslu, B., Calikoglu, A., Seggie, F. N., & Seggie, S. H. (2019). The entrepreneurial university and academic discourses: The meta-synthesis of higher education articles. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(3), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12198
  • van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Sage.
  • Wernick, A. (1991). Promotional culture. CTheory, 15(1-3), 260–281.
  • Williamson, B. (2021). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e) valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1737556
  • Winter, E., & Thompson-Whiteside, H. (2017). Location, location, location: Does place provide the opportunity for differentiation for universities? Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1377798
  • Wong, L. W., Tan, G. W. H., Hew, J. J., Ooi, K. B., & Leong, L. Y. (2020). Mobile social media marketing: a new marketing channel among digital natives in higher education? Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 32(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1834486
  • Xiong, T. (2012). Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts. Discourse & Society, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511433786
  • Zhang, Y., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2013). ‘Toward a global knowledge enterprise’: University websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813777
  • Zhu, H., Ren, W., & Han, Z. (2016). The impact of marketization on the communication of Chinese academicians: A genre analytical perspective. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1169194

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.