87
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of marketization on the interpersonal relation between the university and students in modern university prospectuses

ORCID Icon, &
Received 21 May 2022, Accepted 25 Nov 2023, Published online: 19 Dec 2023

References

  • Abbasi, K. (2020). Public universities undergoing financial crisis. Retrieved March 19, 2020, from https://nation.com.pk/30-Jan-2020/public-universities-under-going-financial-crisis
  • Abu Talib, N. A. (2014). Theme and thematic progression of Malaysian higher education advertorials/Nurul Amilin binti Abu Talib [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Malaya.
  • Akhtar, M. M. S., & Kalsoom, T. (2014). Issues of Universities ’ Governance in Pakistan. Journal of Elementary Education, 22(2), 81–94.
  • Alhojailan, A. I. (2020). Genre analysis of Saudi Universities’ websites: Analysis of rhetorical moves and discursive strategies for marketization purposes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(6), 65. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n6p65
  • Al-Mutairi, A., Naser, K., & Saeid, M. (2014). Employability factors of business graduates in Kuwait: Evidence from an emerging country. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(10), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n10p49
  • Amjad, T., & Shakir, A. (2014). Study of information generating linguistic features in online university prospectuses. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(25), 122–128.
  • Anctil, E. J. (2008). Selling higher education: Marketing and advertising America's colleges and universities: Ashe higher education report. ASHE Higher Education Report.
  • Arshad, A., & Shakir, A. (2014). Corpus based study of private and public verbs in online university prospectus. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(25), 24–29.
  • Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres—the international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082576
  • Atai, M. R., & Asadnia, F. (2016). The prestigious World University on its homepage: The promotional academic genre of overview. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1).
  • Ayoola, T. (2013). The effect of cashless policy of government on corruption in Nigeria. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(3), 682–690.
  • Bae, S., Grimm, A. T., & Kim, D. (2023). Only one way to be a world-class university? Comparative analysis on the texts and visual images on websites of universities in China and South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(1), 144–159.
  • Baicheng, Z. (2017). Discourse construction of Chinese universities’ institutional identities. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 4.
  • Bano, Z., & Shakir, A. (2015). Personal pronouns in “about us” section of online university prospectus. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 133–139.
  • Barabas, C. D. (2017). A genre analysis of Philippine University brochures [Unpublished master's thesis]. University of San Carlos, Cebu City, The Philippines.
  • Barabas, C. D. (2018). Rhetorical moves and the functional constituent of process in higher education institutions’ promotional materials. The Asian ESP Journal, 14(1), 364–390.
  • Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
  • Bhatia, V. K. (2005). Generic patterns in promotional discourse. Persuasion across Genres: A Linguistic Approach, 130, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.130.13bha
  • Blankenship, K. L., & Craig, T. Y. (2006). Rhetorical question use and resistance to persuasion: An attitude strength analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06286380
  • Bramley, R. (2001). So you want to build a ‘hall of fame’? In CAUTHE 2001: Capitalising on research; Proceedings of the 11th Australian tourism and hospitality research conference (pp. 17–27). Canberra, ACT: University of Canberra Press.
  • Chueasuai, P. (2017). The interpersonal metafunction and translation of power relations: A case study of fifty shades of grey. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 20(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-02003001
  • Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries (Croom Helm Linguistics Series). Croom Helm.
  • Coffin, C., Hewings, A., & O’Halloran, K. (2014). Applying English grammar: Corpus and functional approaches. Routledge.
  • Cook, G. (2001). The discourse of advertising. Routledge.
  • Dann, G. M. S. (2001). The language of tourism—A sociolinguistic perspective. CAB International.
  • Delin, J. (2000). The language of everyday life: An introduction. Sage.
  • Docherty, T. (2015). Universities at war. Sage.
  • Downing, A., & Locke, P. (2002). A university course in English grammar. Psychology Press.
  • Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional grammar. Pinter.
  • Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group, p. 386, ISBN 0-8264-5787-8.
  • Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing in tertiary EFL context in Indonesia [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne.
  • Erkan, I., Unal, S., & Acikgoz, F. (2023). What affects university image and students’ supportive attitudes: The 4Q Model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 33(2), 205–222.
  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Longman Inc.
  • Frank, J. (1989). The use of questions in direct sales letters. Text, 9(2), 231–259.
  • Gee, J. P. (1999). Critical issues: Reading and the new literacy studies: Reframing the national academy of sciences report on reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 31(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969909548052
  • Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5
  • Guijarro, A. J. M. (2010). A multimodal analysis of “The Tale of Peter Rabbit” within the interpersonal metafunction/ “Un análisis multimodal” de El cuento de Peter Rabbit desde una perspectiva interpersonal. Atlantis, 32(1), 123–140.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1984). On the ineffability of grammatical categories. The Tenth LACUS Forum 1983 (pp. 3–18). Hornbeam Press.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd revised ed.). Edward Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to Halliday’s functional grammar. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Han, Z. (2014). The marketization of public discourse: The Chinese universities. Discourse & Communication, 8(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313503221
  • HEC. (2020). HEC vision 2025. Retrieved March 23, 2019, from https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/HECAnnouncements/Documents/Announcement/HECVision-2025.
  • Hoang, T. V. Y., & Rojas-Lizana, I. (2015). Promotional discourse in the websites of two Australian universities: A discourse analytic approach. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1011488. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1011488
  • Hui, K. L. (2009). Higher education in a globalised market: A comparative discourse study of university prospectuses in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom [Unpublished master thesis]. The University of Edinburgh, UK.
  • Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400103
  • Islam, N. (2004). Sifarish, sycophants, power and collectivism: administrative culture in Pakistan. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852304044259
  • Karapetjana, I. (2011). Pronominal choice in political interviews. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 1(1), 36–45.
  • Károly, S. (1963). Kinds of sentences examined from the point of view of function and form. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 13(3/4), 225–255.
  • Kawashima, K. (2004). Interpersonal relationships in Japanese and Australian women’s magazines: A case study. Proceedings of the 2004 conference of the Australian linguistics society.
  • Khalid, P. Z. B. M. (2013). Modality analysis of the newspaper articles about the Scottish Ship RMS Queen Elizabeth. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(9), 458–461.
  • Khattak, K. (2020). HEC budget cut eclipsed education scene in 2019. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/591770-hec-budget-cut-eclipsed-education-scene-in-2019
  • Kwong, J. (2000). Introduction: Marketization and privatization in education. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(99)00060-7
  • Leech, G. N. (1966). English in advertising: A linguistic study of advertising in Great Britain. Longmans.
  • Lestari, U. T., & Rahmah, R. (2014). Realization of speech functions in cigarette’s slogans. Linguistica, 3(3), 353–364.
  • Levidow, L. (2000). Marketization of higher education: Neo-liberal strategies and counter strategies. Marxism and Education, 2, 237–256.
  • Maci, S. (2007). Virtual touring: The web-language of tourism. Linguistica e Filologia, 25, 41–65.
  • Manzoor, S. R., Ho, J. S. Y., & Al Mahmud, A. (2021). Revisiting the ‘university image model’ for higher education institutions’ sustainability. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 31(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1781736
  • Martin, J. R. (1985). Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (pp. 248–274). Ablex.
  • Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Theme as an enabling resource in ideational ‘knowledge’ construction. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 20–54). London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Mayr, A. (2008). Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. Continuum.
  • Mok, K. H. (2007). Questing for internationalization of universities in Asia: Critical reflections. Journal of studies in international education, 11(3-4), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306291945
  • Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902898841
  • Mushtaq, A., Sadiq, R., & Ijaz, F. (2014). Religious education: Analysis over the years. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 4(2), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.42.05
  • Myers, G. (1994). Words in ads. Arnold.
  • Nasir, A., & Shakir, A. (2015). Use of present tense in online university prospectus. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 9, 64–72.
  • Osman, H. (2008). Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: A genre perspective. Discourse & Communication, 2(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307085577
  • Pakistan Today. (2020). HEC may face up to 50 pc budget cuts. https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2019/04/19/hec-may-face-up-to-50pc-budget-cuts/
  • Pearce, M. (2004). The marketization of discourse about education in UK general election manifestos. Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 24(2), 245–265.
  • Pertiwi, T. I. (2015). The interpersonal meaning of indonesian newspapers in presidential election 2014 (A systemic functional linguistics approach).
  • Pettinger, L., Forkert, K., & Goffey, A. (2018). The promises of creative industry higher education: An analysis of university prospectuses in Malaysia. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 24(4), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1223644
  • Roggendorf, N. (2008). How New Zealand universities present themselves to the public: An analysis of communication strategies [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Auckland University of Technology.
  • Saher, U., & Ch, H. A. (2019). A comparison of self-perceived employability of graduates from public and private universities of Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(1), 119–130.
  • Shahnaz, A. (2013). Linguistic analysis of e-print media advertisements in Pakistan: Practices and functions. Elixir Literature, 62, 17849–17854.
  • Shahnaz, A., Fatima, S. T., & Qadir, S. A. (2022). Education for sale: The identity construction of ‘university’ and ‘students’ in new age university prospectuses. Higher Education Policy, 35, 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00212-y
  • Singh, M., Singh, B., & Singh, K. (2008). The influence of emotional intelligence and learning style on student’s academic achievement. Social and Management Research Journal, 5(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v5i2.5157
  • Špago, D. (2016). Rhetorical questions or rhetorical uses of questions? Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 102–115.
  • Svendsen, J. T., & Svendsen, A. M. (2017). Social life for sale! A critical discourse analysis of the concept of student life on Danish university websites. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(4), 642–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1301381
  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
  • Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  • Teo, P. (2007). The marketisation of higher education: A comparative case-study of two universities in Singapore. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 1(1), 95–111.
  • Teo, P., & Ren, S. (2019). Marketization of universities in China: A critical discourse analysis of the university president’s message. Discourse & Communication, 13(5), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319856203
  • Tetteh, G., & Afful, J. B. A. (2020). Marketisation of Ghanaian higher academic institutions: A hypermodal analysis of universities’ homepages. International Journal of Marketing Semiotics & Discourse Studies, VIII, 1–24.
  • Tian, H. (2010). Discursive production of teaching quality assessment report: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(4), 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.4.06tia
  • Tiejun, W. (2007). Deconstructing modernization. Chinese Sociology & Anthropology, 39(4), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA0009-4625390401
  • Toma, J. D., Dubrow, G., & Hartley, M. (2005). The uses of institutional culture: Strengthening identification and building brand equity in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(2), 1–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3102
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis. Belgian journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
  • Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). 10 Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. Meaning and Relevance, 210. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370
  • Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. Longman.
  • Wu, C., & Fang, J. (2006). The social semiotics of university introductions in Australia and China. 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress, 568–591. http://www.pucsp.br/isfc/proceedings/Artigos pdf/27acd_fang_568a591.pdf
  • Xie, C., & Teo, P. (2020). Tuning up the promotional volume: Comparing the about us texts of top-and second-tier universities in China and America. Journal of Pragmatics, 159, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.010
  • Xiong, T. (2012). Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts. Discourse and Society, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511433786
  • Yang, M. (2019). Organizational identity construction of the world’s top universities: A discourse analysis of university prospectuses. Beyond Philology: An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching, 16(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2019.1.05
  • Young, J. (2002). Heidegger’s later philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Yuliana, D., & Imperiani, E. D. (2017). The realization of interpersonal meaning in course newsletters: A systemic functional linguistic perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6873
  • Zaidi, S. (2013). Madrassa education in Pakistan: Controversies, challenges and prospects, Centre for international and strategic analysis (No. 3, p. 4). Report.
  • Zhang, T. (2017). The marketization of higher education discourse: A genre analysis of university website homepages in China. Higher Education Studies, 7(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n3p64
  • Zhang, Y., & O'Halloran, K. L. (2013). ‘Toward a global knowledge enterprise’: University websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813777

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.