Sales Technology Applications: Exploring Group Support Systems in Sales Management Applications

References

• Albanese, R. and D.D. Van Fleet (1985), “Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free Riding Tendency,” Academy of Management Review, 10, 244–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, Steven H. and Edward J. Conlon (1994), “Effects of Distribution of Feedback in Work Groups,” Academy of Management Journal, 37(3)., 641–655.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T., L. M. Jessup, and J. Valacich (1990), “Idea generation using a GDSS: Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone,” Management Science, 36(6), 689–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curren, Mary T., Valerie S. Folkes, and Joel H. Steckel (1992), “Explanations of Successful and Unsuccessful Marketing Decisions: The Decision Maker's Perspective,” The Journal of Marketing, 56(April), 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., C.K. Tyran, D.R. Vogel, and J.F. Nunamaker (1990), “An Evaluation of Electronic Meeting Support for Strategic Management,” Proceedings of ICIS, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., C.K. Tyran, D.R. Vogel, and J.F. Nunamaker, J.S. Valacich, and J.F. Nunamaker (1990), “An Experimental Investigation of Group Size in an Electronic Meeting System Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(5), 1049–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande, Rohit and Gerald Zaltman (1987), “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Use of Marketing Information in Customer and Industrial Firms,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24(February) 114–118.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, M. and W. Stroebe (1987), “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C.A., S. J. Gibbs, and G. L. Rein (1991), “Groupware: Some Issues and Experiences,” Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, Michael (1991), “Welcome to the Electronic Meeting,” Training, (July), 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gallupe, R. B., W. Cooper, and L. Bastianutti (1990), “Why is Electronic Brainstorming More Productive than Traditional Brainstorming,” Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference Proceedings, Information Systems Division (Whistler, Canada), 82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, Rashi, Joel H. Steckel and Russell S. Winer (1987), “Group Process and Decision Performance in a Simulated Marketing Environment,” Journal of Business Research, 15, 545–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J.R. and R.E. Kaplan (1974), “Interventions into Group Process: An Approach to Improving the Effectiveness of Groups,” Decision Sciences, 5, 459–480.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, G.W. (1982), “Group versus individual performance Are N+1 heads better than one?” Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517 539.
   Google Scholar
• Jablin, F.M. and D.R. Siebold (1978), “Implications for Problem Solving Groups of Empirical Research on ‘Brainstorming’: A Critical Review of the Literature,” The Southern States Speech Communication Journal, 43, 327–356.
   Google Scholar
• Jessup, L. M., T. Connolly, and J. Galegher (1990), “The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task,” MIS Quarterly, 14(3), 312–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, H. and G. Trommsdorff (1973), “Group Versus Individual Performance on Tasks Requiring Ideational Proficiency (Brainstorming): A review,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 361–387.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Hanjoon, Frank Acito, and Ralph L. Day (1987), “Evaluations and Use of Market Research by Decision Makers: A Behavioral Simulation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24(May) 187–196.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T.W. and J.F. Rockart (1994), “Computers, Networks, and the Corporation,” in Management of Information Systems, (Paul Gray, William King, Ephraim McLean, and Hugh Watson, eds.), New York: Dryden.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, Poppy L. (1992). “An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis,” Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 257–280.
   Google Scholar
• Nagasundaram, M. and A.R. Dennis (1993), “When a Group is Not a Group: The Cognitive Foundation of Group Idea Generation,” Small Group Research, 24(4), 463–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., L.M. Applegate, and B.R. Konsynski (1988), “Computer-aided Deliberation: Model Management and Group Decision Support,” Journal of Operations Research, 36(6), 826–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., L.M. Applegate, and B.R. Konsynski, A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D.R. Vogel, and J.F. George (1991), “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work,” Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 40–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A. and K.L. Kraemar (1989), “The Impact of Technological Support on Groups: An Assessment of the Empirical Research,” Decision Support Systems, 5(2), 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1957), Leadership in Administration: A sociological interpretation, New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. (1981), Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, 3rd edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J., V. Dubrovsky, S. Kiesler, and T.W. McGuire (1986), “Group Processes in Computer Mediated Communication,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, Dean, Valerie Dunn, and Choy Wong (1992). “Managing Conflict Between Departments to Service Customers,” Human Relations, 45(10), 1035–1054.
   Google Scholar
• Tryan, Craig K., Alan R. Dennis, Douglas R. Vogel, and J.F. Nunamaker, Jr. (1992), “The Application of Electronic Meeting Technology to Support Strategic Management,” MIS Quarterly, 16(September), 316–334.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, Glen (1991), “Decision Failures: Why They Occur and How to Prevent Them,” Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, George M., Erich A. Joachimsthaler, and Thomas C. Kinnear (1987), “Individual Differences and Marketing Decision Support System Usage and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24(May) 208–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar