595
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Distance, Transaction Costs, and Preferences in European Trade

&

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, J. E. 1979. A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review 69(1): 106–116.
  • Anderson, J. E., and van Wincoop, E. 2003. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review 93(1): 170–192.
  • Antia, M., Lin, J. B., and Pantzalis, C. 2007. Cultural Distance and Valuation of Multinational Corporations. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 17(5): 365–383.
  • Baldwin, R., and Taglioni, D. 2006. Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations (NBER Working Paper No. 12516). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12516 (accessed November 30, 2012).
  • Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H. J., and Pennings, J. M. 1996. Foreign Entry, Cultural Barriers, and Learning. Strategic Management Journal 17(2): 151–166.
  • Beckerman, W. 1956. Distance and the Pattern of Inter-European Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 38(1): 31–40.
  • Benedictis, L. D., and Vicarelli, C. 2009. Dummies for Gravity and Gravity for Policies: Mission Impossible. Mimeo, Presented at the European Trade Study Group (ETSG) conference, Rome, Italy, September.
  • Benito, G. R. G., and Gripsrud, G. 1992. The Expansion of Foreign Direct Investments: Discrete Rational Location Choices or a Cultural Learning Process? Journal of International Business Studies 23(3): 461–476.
  • Bergstrand, J. H. 1990. The Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis, and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade. Economic Journal 100(4): 1216–1229.
  • Bernasconi, C. 2009. New Evidence for the Linder Hypothesis and the Two Extensive Margins of Trade. Mimeo, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, February.
  • Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., and Zhou, N. 2010. An Institutional Approach to Cross-National Distance. Journal of International Business Studies 41(9): 1460–1480.
  • Bils, M., and Klenow, P. 2001. Quantifying Quality Growth. American Economic Review 91(4): 1006–1030.
  • Breusch, T., Kompas, T., Nguyen, H. T. M., and Ward, M. B. 2011a. On the Fixed-Effects Vector Decomposition. Political Analysis 19(2): 123–134.
  • Breusch, T., Kompas, T., Nguyen, H. T. M., and Ward, M. B. 2011b. FEVD: Just IV or Just Mistaken. Political Analysis 19(2): 165–169.
  • Brewer, P. A. 2007. Operationalizing Psychic Distance: A Revised Approach. Journal of International Marketing 15(1): 44–66.
  • Chaney, T. 2008. Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade. American Economic Review 98(4): 1707–1721.
  • Choi, C. 2002. Linder Hypothesis Revisited. Applied Economics Letters 9(9): 601–605.
  • Clerides, S., and Stengos, T. 2012. Love Thy Neighbour, Love Thy Kin: Strategy and Bias in the Eurovision Song Contest. Ekonomia 15(10): 22–44.
  • Deardorff, A. 1998. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? In J. Frankel, ed., The Regionalization of the World Economy, pp. 7–32. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dow, D. 2000. A Note on Psychological Distance and Export Market Selection. Journal of International Marketing 8(1): 51–64.
  • Dow, D., and Karunaratna, A. 2006. Developing a Multidimensional Instrument to Measure Psychic Distance Stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies 37(5): 578–602.
  • Ellis, P. D. 2007. Paths to Foreign Markets: Does Distance to Market Affect Firm Internationalisation? International Business Review 16(5): 573–593.
  • Ellis, P. D. 2008. Does Psychic Distance Moderate the Market Size–Entry Sequence Relationship? Journal of International Business Studies 39(3): 351–369.
  • Engwall, L., and Wallenstål, M. 1988. Tit for Tat in Small Steps: The Internationalization of Swedish Banks. Scandinavian Journal of Management 4(3/4): 147–155.
  • Evans, J., Treadgold, A., and Mavondo, F. T. 2000. Psychic Distance and the Performance of International Retailers: A Suggested Theoretical Framework. International Marketing Review 17(4/5): 373–391.
  • Feenstra, R. C. 2002. Border Effects and the Gravity Equation: Consistent Methods for Estimation. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49(5): 491–506.
  • Feenstra, R. C. 2004. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Felbermayr, G. J., and Toubal, F. 2010. Cultural Proximity and Trade. European Economic Review 54(2): 279–293.
  • Fillat-Castejon, C., and Serrano-Sanz, J. M. 2004. Linder Revisited: Trade and Development in the Spanish Economy. International Review of Applied Economics 18(3): 323–348.
  • Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance Still Matters: The Hard Reality of Global Expansion. Harvard Business Review 79(8): 137–147.
  • Ginsburgh, V. A., and Noury, A. 2008. Is Voting Political or Cultural? European Journal of Political Economy 24(1): 41–52.
  • Greenaway, D., Gullstrand, J., and Kneller, R. 2008. Firm Heterogeneity and the Geography of International Trade. University of Nottingham, GEP Research Papers No. 08/41. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/gep/documents/papers/2008/08-41.pdf (accessed November 30, 2012).
  • Greene, W. 2011a. Fixed Effects Vector Decomposition: A Magical Solution to the Problem of Time-Invariant Variables in Fixed Effects Models? Political Analysis 19(2): 135–146.
  • Greene, W. 2011b. Reply to Rejoinder by Plümper and Troeger. Political Analysis 19(2): 170–172.
  • Greytak, D., and McHugh, R. 1977. Linder’s Trade Thesis: An Empirical Examination. Southern Economic Journal January: 1386–1389.
  • Greytak, D., and Tuchinda, U. 1990. The Composition of Consumption and Trade Intensities: An Alternative Test of the Linder Hypothesis. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 126(1): 50–57.
  • Haan, M. A., Dijkstra, S. G., and Dijkstra, P. T. 2005. Expert Judgment versus Public Opinion—Evidence from the Eurovision Song Contest. Journal of Cultural Economics 29(1): 59–78.
  • Håkanson, L., and Ambos, B. 2010. The Antecedents of Psychic Distance. Journal of International Management 16(3): 195–210.
  • Hallak, J. C. 2010. A Product-Quality View of the Linder Hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics 92(3): 453–466.
  • Helpman, E., and Krugman, P. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M., and Rubinstein, Y. 2008. Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2): 441–487.
  • Hennart, J., and Larimo, J. 1998. The Impact of Culture on the Strategy of Multinational Enterprises: Does National Origin Affect Ownership Decisions? Journal of International Business Studies 29(3): 515–538.
  • Hirsch, Z., and Lev, B. 1973. Trade and Per Capita Income Differentials: A Test of the Burenstam-Linder Hypothesis. World Development 1(9): 11–17.
  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. 2006. What Did GLOBE Really Measure? Researchers’ Minds versus Respondents’ Minds. Journal of International Business Studies 37(6): 882–896.
  • Hoftyzer, J. 1975. Empirical Verification of Linder’s Trade Thesis: Comment. Southern Economic Journal April: 694–698.
  • Hörnell, E., Vahlne, J.-E., and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. 1973. Export och utlandsetableringar. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist and Wiksell.
  • Hufbauer, G. C. 1970. The Impact of National Characteristics and Technology on the Commodity Composition of Trade in Manufactured Goods. In R. Vernon, ed., The Technology Factor in International Trade, pp. 143–232. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Hummels, D., and Klenow, P. 2005. The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports. American Economic Review 95(3): 704–723.
  • Javidian, M., Dorfman, P. W., de Luque, M., and House, R. J. 2006. In the Eye of the Beholder: Cross Cultural Lessons in Leadership from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives 20(1): 67–90.
  • Johanson, J., and Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The Internationalisation Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Market Commitment. Journal of International Business Studies 8(1): 23–32.
  • Johanson, J., and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. 1975. The Internationalization of the Firm: Four Swedish Cases. Journal of Management Studies 12(3): 305–322.
  • Kennedy, T. E., and McHugh, R. 1980. An Intertemporal Test and Rejection of the Linder Hypothesis. Southern Economic Journal January: 898–903.
  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., and Gibson, C. B. 2006. A Quarter Century of Culture’s Consequences: A Review of Empirical Research Incorporating Hofstede’s Cultural Values Framework. Journal of International Business Studies 37(3): 285–320.
  • Kogut, B., and Singh, H. 1988. The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business Studies 19(3): 411–432.
  • Leamer, E. E. 1995. The Heckscher–Ohlin Model in Theory and Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Linder, S. B. 1961. An Essay on Trade and Transformation. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist and Wiksell.
  • McPherson, M. A., Redfearn, M. R., and Tieslau, M. A. 2000. A Re-Examination of the Linder Hypothesis: A Random-Effects Tobit Approach. International Economic Journal 14(3): 123–136.
  • McPherson, M. A., Redfearn, M. R., and Tieslau, M. A. 2001. International Trade and Developing Countries: An Empirical Investigation of the Linder Hypothesis. Applied Economics 33(5): 649–657.
  • Melitz, M. J. 2003. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica 71(6): 1695–1725.
  • Nordström, K. 1991. The Internationalization Process of the Firm: Searching for New Patterns and Explanations. Stockholm, Sweden: Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics.
  • Nordström, K., and Vahlne, J. E. 1994. Is the Globe Shrinking? Psychic Distance and the Establishment of Swedish Sales Subsidiaries during the Last 100 Years. In M. Landeck, ed., International Trade: Regional and Global Issues, pp. 41–56. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  • O’Cass, A., and Julian, C. 2003. Examining Firm And Environmental Influences on Export Marketing Mix Strategy and Export Performance of Australian Exporters. European Journal of Marketing 37(3/4): 366–384.
  • O’Grady, S., and Lane, H. W. 1996. The Psychic Distance Paradox. Journal of International Business Studies 27(2): 309–333.
  • Overman, H. G., Redding, S., and Venables, A. J. 2003. The Economic Geography of Trade, Production, and Income: A Survey of Empirics. In E. Kwan-Choi and J. Harrigan, eds., Handbook of International Trade, pp. 353–387. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., and Kemmelmeier, M. 2002. Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 128(1): 3–72.
  • Plümper, T., and Troeger, V. E. 2007. Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects. Political Analysis 15(2): 124–139.
  • Plümper, T., and Troeger, V. E. 2011. Fixed-Effects Vector Decomposition: Properties, Reliability, and Instruments. Political Analysis 19(2): 147–164.
  • Qureshi, U. A., French, G. L., and Sailors, J. W. 1980. Linder’s Trade Thesis: A Further Examination. Southern Economic Journal January: 933–936.
  • Sailors, J. W., Qureshi, U. A., and Cross, E. M. 1973. Empirical Verification of Linder’s Trade Thesis. Southern Economic Journal October: 262–268.
  • Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural Distance Revisited: Toward a More Rigorous Conceptualization and Measurement of Cultural Differences. Journal of International Business Studies 32(3): 519–535.
  • Smith, P. B. 2006. When Elephants Fight, the Grass Gets Trampled: The GLOBE and Hofstede Projects. Journal of International Business Studies 37(6): 915–921.
  • Sousa, C. M. P., and Bradley, F. 2006. Cultural Distance and Psychic Distance: Two Peas in a Pod? Journal of International Marketing 14(1): 49–70.
  • Sousa, C. M. P., and Lages, L. F. 2011. The PD Scale: A Measure of Psychic Distance and Its Impact on International Marketing Strategy. International Marketing Review 28(2): 201–222.
  • Sousa, C. M. P., Martinéz-Lopés, F. J., and Coelho, F. 2008. The Determinants of Export Behavior: A Review of the Research in the Literature between 1998 and 2005. International Journal of Management Reviews 10(4): 343–374.
  • Spierdijk, L., and Vellekoop, M. H. 2006. Geography, Culture, and Religion: Explaining the Bias in Eurovision Song Contest Voting (Memorandum No. 1794). Enschede, The Netherlands: Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente.
  • Srivastava, K. R., and Green, R. T. 1986. Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows. Journal of Business 59(4): 623–640.
  • Stöttinger, B., and Schlegelmilch, B. B. 1988. Explaining Export Development through Psychic Distance: Enlightening or Elusive? International Marketing Review 15(5): 357–372.
  • Taavo, S. 2008. Demand-Based Determinants of Trade: The Role of Country Preferences. Master’s Thesis, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Tadesse, B., and White, R. 2010. Does Cultural Distance Hinder Trade in Goods? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Member Nations. Open Economies Review 21(2): 237–261.
  • Thursby, J. G., and Thursby, M. C. 1987. Bilateral Trade Flows, the Linder Hypothesis, and Exchange Risk. Review of Economics and Statistics 69(3): 488–495.
  • Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
  • Yair, G. 1995. ‘Unite Unite Europe’: The Political and Cultural Structures of Europe as Reflected in the Eurovision Song Contest. Social Networks 17(2): 147–161.
  • Yair, G., and Maman, D. 1996. The Persistent Structure of Hegemony in the Eurovision Song Contest. Acta Sociologica 39(3): 309–325.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.