Emerging Powers in WTO Negotiations: The Domestic Sources of Trade Policy Preferences

REFERENCES

• Alesina , A. 1987 . Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 102 ( 2 ) : 651 – 678 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho , M. I. 2010 . Condicionantes Internacionais e Domésticos: O Brasil e o G-20 nas Negociações Agrícolas da Rodada Doha . DADOS Revista de Ciências Sociais , 53 ( 2 ) : 405 – 445 .
   Google Scholar
• Conceição-Heldt , E. D. 2011 . Negotiating Trade Liberalization at the WTO: Domestic Politics and Bargaining Dynamics , Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Conceição-Heldt , E. D. 2013a . Two-Level Games and Trade Cooperation: What Do We Now Know? . International Politics , 50 ( 4 ) : 579 – 599 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conceição-Heldt , E. D. 2013b . The Domestic Sources of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Explaining Brazil's Negotiating Position in the Doha Round . The International Trade Journal , 27 ( 2 ) : 173 – 194 .
   Google Scholar
• Confederação Única dos Trabalhadores. 2007. Carta Enviada pela CUT sobre a Retomada das Negociações na OMC http://intranet.cut.org.br (http://intranet.cut.org.br) (Accessed: 4 September 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• Confederation of Indian Farmers Associations (CIFA). 2012. Farmers' Agenda for Economic Equity http://indianfarmers.org/farmers-agenda-for-economic-equity-k-ramasubba-reddy/ (http://indianfarmers.org/farmers-agenda-for-economic-equity-k-ramasubba-reddy/) (Accessed: 30 July 2013 ).
   Google Scholar
• Coskeran , H. , Kim , D. and Narlikar , A. 2012 . “ Trade in Manufactures and Agricultural Products ” . In The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization , Edited by: Narlikar , A. , Daunton , M. and Stern , P. A. 343 – 369 . Oxford : Oxford University Press . Ineds.pp.
   Google Scholar
• Davis , C. L. 2004 . International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization . American Political Science Review , 98 ( 1 ) : 153 – 169 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bièvre , D. and Dür , A. 2005 . Constituency Interests and Delegation in European and American Trade Policy . Comparative Political Studies , 38 ( 10 ) : 1271 – 1296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bièvre , D. and Eckhardt , J. 2011 . Interest Groups and EU Anti-Dumping Policy . Journal of European Public Policy , 18 ( 3 ) : 339 – 360 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür , A. 2010 . Protection for Exporters: Discrimination and Liberalization in Transatlantic Trade Relations, 1930–2010 , Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich , S. D. 2007 . Access to Protection: Domestic Institutions and Trade Policy in Democracies . International Organization , 67 ( 3 ) : 571 – 605 .
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich , S. D. 2009 . Constituency Size and Support for Trade Liberalization: An Analysis of Foreign Economic Policy Preferences in Congress . Foreign Policy Analysis , 5 ( 3 ) : 215 – 232 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsig , M. and Dupont , C. 2012 . “ Persistent Deadlock in Multilateral Trade Negotiations ” . In The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization , Edited by: Narlikar , A. , Daunton , M. and Stern , R. M. 587 – 628 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Evenett , S. J. 2006 . The World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong: What Next? . Journal of World Trade , 40 ( 2 ) : 221 – 238 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon , J. D. 1998 . Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International Relations . Annual Review of Political Science , 1 : 289 – 313 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo. 2008. Quem Somos http://www.fiesp.com.br/fiesp/default.aspx (http://www.fiesp.com.br/fiesp/default.aspx) (Accessed: 14 August 2008 ).
   Google Scholar
• Frieden , J. A. 1988 . “ Sectoral Conflict and U.S. Foreign Economic Policy ” . In The State and American Foreign Economic Policy , Edited by: Ikenberry , J. , Lake , D. A. and Mastanduno , M. 59 – 90 . Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press . Ineds.pp.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden , J. A. 1999 . “ Actors and Preferences in International Relations ” . In Strategic Choice and International Relations , Edited by: Lake , D. A. and Powell , R. 39 – 76 . Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press . Ineds.pp.
   Google Scholar
• G-20. 2005. Two Years of Activities of the G-20: Moving Forward the Doha Round http://www.g-20.mre.gov.br/conteudo (http://www.g-20.mre.gov.br/conteudo) (Accessed: 27 March 2007 ).
   Google Scholar
• Ghosn , F. 2010 . Getting to the Table and Getting to Yes: An Analysis of International Negotiations . International Studies Quarterly , 54 ( 4 ) : 1055 – 1072 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein , J. 2012 . “ Trade Liberalization and Domestic Politics ” . In The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization , Edited by: Narlikar , A. , Daunton , M. and Stern , R. M. 64 – 82 . Oxford : Oxford University Press . Ineds.pp.
   Google Scholar
• Goméz-Mera , L. 2009 . Domestic Constraints on Regional Cooperation: Explaining Trade Conflict in MERCOSUR . Review of International Political Economy , 16 ( 5 ) : 746 – 777 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch , P. 1986 . Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises , Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hiscox , M. J. 2002 . International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions and Mobility , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell , A. and Narlikar , A. 2006 . The New Politics of Confrontation? Brazil and India in Multilateral Trade Negotiations . Global Society , 24 ( 4 ) : 415 – 433 .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , K. 2010 . The Doha Blues: Institutional Crisis and Reform in the WTO , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , D. and Wilkinson , R. 2007 . The WTO after Hong Kong: Progress in, and Prospects for, the Doha Development Agenda , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Lilja , J. 2012 . Domestic-Level Factors and Negotiation (In)Flexibility in the WTO . International Negotiation , 17 ( 1 ) : 115 – 138 .
   Google Scholar
• Mahrenbach , L. 2013 . The Trade Policy of Emerging Powers , Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan .
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield , E. D. , Milner , H. V. and Pevehouse , J. C. 2007 . Vetoing Cooperation: The Impact of Veto Players on International Trade Agreements . British Journal of Political Science , 37 ( 5 ) : 403 – 432 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marconini , M. 2005 . Trade Policy-Making Process in Brazil , London : London School of Economics .
   Google Scholar
• McGillivray , F. 2004 . Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Milner , H. V. 1997 . Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Milner , H. V. and Rosendorff , P. B. 1997 . Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations: Elections and Divided Government as Constraints on Trade Liberalization . Journal of Conflict Resolution , 41 ( 1 ) : 117 – 146 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik , A. 1997 . Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics . International Organization , 51 ( 4 ) : 513 – 553 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta Veiga , P. and Martinez-Diaz , L. 2013 . “ Brazil's Trade Policy: Moving Away from Old Paradigms ” . In Brazil as an Economic Superpower? Understanding Brazil's Changing Role in the Global Economy , eds , Edited by: Brainard , L. 26 – 52 . Washington , DC : Brookings Institution Press .
   Google Scholar
• Narlikar , A. 2010a . Deadlocks in Multilateral Negotiations: Causes and Solutions , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Narlikar , A. 2010b . New Powers in the Club: The Challenges of Global Trade Governance . International Affairs , 86 ( 3 ) : 717 – 728 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar , A. and Tussie , D. 2004 . The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO . The World Economy , 27 ( 7 ) : 947 – 966 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira , S. 2009 . The International Financial Crisis and Brazil in the Doha Development Round , Geneva : Institute for International Trade Negotiations .
   Google Scholar
• Odell , J. S. 2000 . Negotiating the World Economy , Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Odell , J. S. 2006 . Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Odell , J. S. 2009 . Breaking Deadlocks in International Institutional Negotiations: The WTO, Seattle, and Doha . International Studies Quarterly , 53 ( 2 ) : 273 – 299 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD . 2005 . OECD Review of Agricultural Policies: Brazil , Paris : OECD .
   Google Scholar
• Olson , M. 1965 . The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Priyadarshi , S. 2005 . “ Decision-Making Processes in India: The Case of the Agriculture Negotiations ” . In Managing the Challenges of WTO Participation: 45 Case Studies , Edited by: Gallagher , P. , Low , P. and Stoler , A. L. 216 – 230 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press . Ineds.pp.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam , R. D. 1988 . Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games . International Organization , 42 ( 3 ) : 427 – 460 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray , A. S. and Saha , S. 2009 . “ Unaltered Paradigm ” . In India's Stance at the WTO: Shifting Coordinates New Delhi: Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski , R. 1989 . Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski , R. 1999 . “ Institutions as Constraints on Strategic Choice ” . In Strategic Choice and International Relations , Edited by: Lake , D. A. and Powell , R. 115 – 136 . Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press . Ineds.pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sally , R. 2011 . Indian Trade Policy after the Crisis , Brussels : European Centre for International Political Economy .
   Google Scholar
• Sengputa , S. 2006 . “ On India's Farms, a Plague of Suicide ” . In The New York Times September 19http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/world/asia/19india.html (accessed August 14, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Simonelli , N. 2011 . Bargaining over International Multilateral Agreements: The Duration of Negotiations . International Interactions , 37 ( 2 ) : 147 – 169 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh , J. P. 2008 . Negotiation and the Global Information Economy , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Stephen , M. D. 2012 . Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa . Global Society , 26 ( 3 ) : 289 – 309 .
   Google Scholar
• Thakurta , P. July 2006 . “ 2006. Trade-India: Rare Unity against West's Farm Subsidies ” . In Inter Press Service July , 27http://www.ipsnews.net/2006/07/trade-india-rare-unity-against-wests-farm-subsidies/ (accessed August 14, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Vickers , B. 2012 . “ The Role of the BRICs in the WTO: System-Supporters or Change Agents in Multilateral Trade? ” . In The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization , Edited by: Narlikar , A. , Daunton , M. and Stern , R. M. 254 – 273 . Oxford : Oxford University Press. . Ineds.pp.
   Google Scholar
• Whalley , J. 1999 . Special and Differential Treatment on the Millenium Round . The World Economy , 22 ( 8 ) : 1065 – 1093 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2001a. Doha WTO Ministerial 2001: Ministerial Declaration http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e (http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e) (Accessed: 14 March 2007 ).
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2001b. Ministerial Conference: Fourth Session http://www.wto.org (http://www.wto.org) (Accessed: 25 July 2013 ).
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2001c. The Doha Declaration Explained http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e) (Accessed: 25 August 2008 ).
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2003. Agriculture Framework Proposal: Joint Proposal by Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, India, Mexico, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, South Africa, Thailand and Venezuela http://docsonline.wto.org (http://docsonline.wto.org) (Accessed: 27 March 2007 ).
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2006. Lamy Outlines Schedule for ‘Moment-of-Truth’ Meetings. WTO News Release, June 28 http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/ (http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/) (Accessed: 18 April 2007 ).
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization , WTO . 2011 . International Trade Statistics 2011 , Geneva : WTO .
   Google Scholar