Towards a Concept of Emancipation for a Diverse Left: Reflecting on My Practice

References

• Allen, Amy. 1998. “Rethinking Power.” Hypatia 13, no. 1: 21–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810605.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Amy. 2008. “Power and the Politics of Difference: Oppression, Empowerment and Transnational Justice.” Hypatia, 23, no. 3 (July–September): 156–172. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01210.x.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities - Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2020. “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/feminism-epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-On, Tamir. 2018. “‘Islamofascism’: Four Competing Discourses on the Islamism-Fascism Comparison.”, Fascism 7, no. 2: 241–274, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/22116257-00702005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltansky, Luc. 2013. On Critique – A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Second Edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Bob and Sealey, Alison. 2000. “Language, structure and agency: What can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics?” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4: 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00100.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Maeve. 2006. Representing the Good Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demirović, Alex. 2007. Nicos Poulantzas: Aktualität und Probleme materialistischer Staatstheorie. Münster: Westphälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Demirović, Alex. 2019. “Zwei Weisen der Emanzipation – oder: Ist Emanzipation noch ein Ziel sozialer Kämpfe?” In Emanzipation - Zur Geschichte und Aktualität eines politischen Begriffes. Edited by Alex Demirović, Susanne Lettow, Andrea Maihofer, 206–230. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Dohm, Hedwig. 1874. “Die wissenschaftliche Emanzipation der Frau.” in Emanzipation. 2. Auflage (1982), 1–188 . Zurich: Ala Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Elbe, I., Ellmers, S., Eufinger J. 2012. Anonyme Herrschaft – Zur Struktur moderner Machtverhältnisse. Münster: Westphälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Erich, J.S. and Gruber, J.G. 1840. “Emancipation.” In Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste. Erste Section – A-G. Vierunddreißigster Theil. Edited by J.G. Gruber (Leipzig: 1840) – Original Text reprinted in Emanzipation. Edited by Martin Greifenhagen (1973). Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni-Halevy, Eva. 1989. “Elite Power, Manipulation and Corruption: A Demo-Elite Perspective.” Government and Opposition 24, no. 2: 215–231. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44482438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanon, Frantz. 1968. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Constance Farrington. New York: Grove Weidenfield. http://niqhat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Frantz-Fanon-The-Wretched-of-the-Earth-1965.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism – From State Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paolo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30^th Anniversary Edition 2005, Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Continuum. https://envs.ucsc.edu/internships/internship-readings/freire-pedagogy-of-the-oppressed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, Des. 1996. “Essentialism in and about development discourse.” The European Journal of Development Research, 8, no.1: 149–176. DOI: 10.1080/09578819608426656
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Danya. 2014. “The Effects of Child Maltreatment on the Developing Brain.” Medico-Legal Journal, 82, no. 3: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817214540395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. [1985] 2016. A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=4392065.
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, Jonathan G. 2019. “Emotion as power: capital and strategy in the field of politics.” Journal of Political Power, 12, no. 2: 224–244. DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2019.1618485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, John. 2002. Change the World Without Taking Power. The Meaning of Revolution Today. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchens, Anna. 2009. Changing Big Business – The Globalisation of the Fairtrade Movement. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Imbusch, Peter. 2012. “Macht und Herrschaft in der wissenschaftlichen Kontroverse.” In Macht und Herrschaft - Sozialwissenschaftliche Theorien und Konzeptionen, 9–35. Edited by Peter Imbusch. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, Jeffrey C. 1987a. “Beyond the Three Faces of Power: A Realist Critique.” Polity. 20, no. 1 (Autumn): 4–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3234935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, Jeffrey C. 1987b. Power and Marxist Theory: A Realist View. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2007. Kapitalismus, Regulation, Staat – Ausgewählte Schriften. Hamburg: Argument.
   Google Scholar
• Kotz, David M. 2009. “The Financial and Economic Crisis of 2008: A Systemic Crisis of Neoliberal Capitalism.” Review of Radical Political Economics 41, no. 3 (September): 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613409335093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. 2002. Emanzipation und Differenz. Aus dem Englischen von Oliver Marchert. Wien: Turia + Kant.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, Derek. 2005. Understanding Social Theory. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lettow, Susanne. 2019. “Subjektivität, Herrschaft und Zeit – Dimensionen eines feminsitischen Begriffs der Emanzipation.“ In Emanzipation - Zur Geschichte und Aktualität eines politischen Begriffes. Edited by Alex Demirović, Susanne Lettow, Andrea Maihofer, 37–56. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, Gerda. 1986. The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, U., Mader, D. and Pühretmayer, H. 2017. “Einleitung. Critical Realism als Philosophie der Sozialwissenschaften.” In Critical Realism meets kritische Sozialtheorie – Onotologie, Erklärung und Kritik in den Sozialwissenschaften. Edited by Urs Lindner and Dimitri Mader. 7–73. Berlin: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, Frank. 2010. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power – A Radical View. Second Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mader, Dimitri. 2016. “Theorizing Agency and Domination through a Critical Realist Perspective on Gender Positionality.” Journal of Critical Realism, 15, no. 5: 440–457. DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2016.1210338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthaei, Julie. 1996. “Why Feminist, Marxist, and Anti-Racist Economists Should be Feminist–Marxist–Anti-Racist Economists.” Feminist Economics, 2, no. 1: 22–42. DOI: 10.1080/738552684
   Google Scholar
• Northup, S. (1853). Twelve Years a Slave: Narrative of Solomon Northup, a Citizen of New-York, Kidnapped in Washington City in 1841, and Rescued in 1853. Derby and Miller. https://docsouth.unc.edu/fpn/northup/northup.html
   Google Scholar
• Poliakov, Leon. 2003. The History of Anti-Semitism, Volume 3: From Voltaire to Wagner. Translated by Miriam Kochan. Pennsylvania: Penn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, William Clare. 2017. “The Idea of Emancipation after Postcolonial Theory.” Interventions, 19, no. 6: 747–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankara, Thomas. 2002. “Building a New Society, Rid of Social Injustice and Imperial Domination.” In We Are Heirs of the World’s Revolutions: Thomas Sankara – Speeches from the Burkina Faso Revolution 1983–87. New York: Pathfinder.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago, C.D., Wadsworth, M.E. and Stump, J. 2011. “Socioeconomic Status, Neighborhood Disadvantage, and Poverty-Related Stress: Prospective Effects on Psychological Syndromes among Diverse Low-Income Families.” Journal of Economic Psychology 32: 218–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, Hartwig. 2012. “Macht und Herrschaft – Eine Realistische Analyse.” In Anonyme Herrschaft – Zur Struktur moderner Machtverhältnisse. Edited by Ingo Elbe, Sven Ellmers, Jan Eufinger, 35–81. Münster: Westphälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Joan Wallach. 2012. “The Vexed Relationship of Emancipation and Equality” In History of the Present, 2, no. 2 (Fall): 148–168. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/historypresent.2.2.0148?origin=JSTOR-pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sikorski, Christian von, and Jörg Matthes. 2020. “Framing and Journalism.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, by Christian von Sikorski and Jörg Matthes. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.817.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Feminist Epistomology.” Accessed September 15, 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Angus. 2001. Theories of Power and Domination. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stögner, K. (2020). Intersectionality and Antisemitism – A New Approach. Fathom. https://fathomjournal.org/intersectionality-and-antisemitism-a-new-approach/
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. (2014). “Emancipation.” In M. T. Gibbons (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (pp. 1024–1038). Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Ton Steine Scherben. “Keine Macht für Niemand (with English Translation).” YouTube, Accessed September 6, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5KE0SuRqpw
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division. “The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021.” Accessed November 1, 2021. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/.
   Google Scholar
• VeneKlasen, Lisa and Miller, Valerie. 2006. A New Weave of Power, People and Politics: The Action Guide for Advocacy and Citizen Participation. Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wartenberg, Thomas E. 1990. The Forms of Power. From Domination to Transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. 1905. Die Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Reprint (2006). Erftstadt: Area Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. 1922. “Die Typen der Herrschaft.” In: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft – Grundrisse einer verstehenden Soziologie. Erster Teil: Die Wirtschaft und die gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen und Mächte, 122–176. Tübingen: Mohr. Accessed via Textlog.de on October 21, 2021: https://www.textlog.de/7323.html
   Google Scholar
• Winker, Gabriele. 2018. “Care Revolution, interviewed by Brigitte Aulenbacher and Birgit Riegraf.” In: Equalitiy, Diversity and Inclusion. no. 37, 4: 420–428. https://www.gabriele-winker.de/pdf/Interview_Care_Revolution_EDI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. Verso.
   Google Scholar