Young people’s preferences for social interaction in terms of homophily and social inclusion: a critical discussion about respect

References

• Allan, J. 2004. “Deterritorializations: Putting Postmodernism to Work on Teacher Education and Inclusion.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (4): 417–432.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00078.x
   Google Scholar
• Allan, J. 2005. “Inclusion as an Ethical Project.” In Foucault and the Government of Disability, edited by S. Tremain, 281–297. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. 2005. “Reinventing ‘Inclusion’: New Labour and the Cultural Politics of Special Education.” Oxford Review of Education 31 (1): 135–151.10.1080/0305498042000337237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, A., D. Armstrong, and I. Spandagou. 2010. Inclusive Education: International Policy and Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. 2003. The Crooked Timber of Humanity. London: Pimlico.
   Google Scholar
• Bessant, J., and D. Francis. 2005. “Transferring Soft Technologies: Exploring Adaptive Theory.” International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 4 (2): 93–112.10.1386/ijtm.2005.4.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., G. L. Clore, and G. Smeaton. 1986. “The Attraction Hypothesis: Do Similar Attitudes Affect Anything?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1167–1170.10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigman, R. 2007a. Included or Excluded: The Challenge of the Mainstream for Some SEN Children. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cigman, R. 2007b. “A Question of Universality: Inclusive Education and the Principle of Respect.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (4): 776–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. M., and R. Meleady. 2012. “Adapting to a Multicultural Future.” Science 336 (6083): 853–855.10.1126/science.1219009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, N. 2005. “Invisible Disability.” Ethics 116 (1): 153–213.10.1086/et.2005.116.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 2010. “Justice for Hedgehogs: Keynote Address.” Boston University Law Review 90: 469–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, A., and A. Howes. 2009. “Towards an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda for Inclusive Education.” In Psychology for Inclusive Education, edited by P. Hick, R. Kershner, and P. T. Farrell, 153–164. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frostad, P., and S. J. Pijl. 2007. “Does being Friendly Help in Making Friends? The Relation between the Social Position and Social Skills of Pupils with Special Educational Needs in Mainstream Education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 22 (1): 15–30.10.1080/08856250601082224
   Google Scholar
• Goodhart, D. 2004. “Discomfort of Strangers.” The Guardian, February 24, 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, D. 2008. “Democracy, Citizenship Education and Inclusion: A Multi-dimensional Approach.” Prospects 38 (1): 35–46.10.1007/s11125-008-9054-1
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Klohnen, E. C., and S. Luo. 2003. “Interpersonal Attraction and Personality: What is Attractive – Self, Similarity, Ideal Similarity, Complementarity, or Attachment Security?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (4): 709–722.10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. 1981. The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice, Vol. 1. San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kossinets, G., and D. Watts. 2009. “Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network.” American Journal of Sociology 115 (2): 405–450.10.1086/599245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layder, D. 1998. Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, G. 2002. “The Disappearance of Disability? Thoughts on a Changing Culture.” British Journal of Special Education 29 (4): 159–163.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nangle, D. W., C. A. Erdley, K. R. Zeff, and L. L. Stanchfield. 2002. “Opposites Do not Attract: Social Status and Behavioral-style Concordances and Discordances among Children and the Peers Who Like or Dislike Them.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 32 (4): 425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. 2008. Dilemmas of Difference, Inclusion and Disability: International Perspectives and Future Directions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. 2007. “Inclusion as a Strategy for Achieving Education for All.” In The Sage Handbook of Special Education, edited by L. Florian, 117–130. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pirrie, A., and G. Head. 2007. “Martians in the Playground: Researching Special Educational Needs.” Oxford Review of Education 33 (1): 19–31.10.1080/03054980601119441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C. 2011. Real World Research. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. 1995. “Empowerment Examined.” Development in Practice 5 (2): 101–107.10.1080/0961452951000157074
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slee, R. 2011. The Irregular School: Exclusion, Schooling and Inclusive Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E., and P. J. Burke. 2000. “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (3): 224–237.10.2307/2695870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappan, M. 2006. “Reframing Internalised Oppression and Internalised Domination: From the Psychological to the Sociocultural.” Teachers College Record 108 (10): 2115–2144.10.1111/tcre.2006.108.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2005. “Beyond the Dilemma of Difference: The Capability Approach to Disability and Special Educational Needs.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (3): 443–459.10.1111/jope.2005.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2013. “A Review of Thinking and Research about Inclusive Education Policy, with Suggestions for a New Kind of Inclusive Thinking.” British Educational Research Journal 39 (3): 473–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremain, S., ed. 2005. Foucault and the Government of Disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., and R. A. Bianchi. 2006. “Valuing Diversity and Interest in Intergroup Contact.” Journal of Social Issues 62 (3): 533–551.10.1111/josi.2006.62.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turiel, E. 2008. “Thought about Actions in Social Domains: Morality, Social Conventions, and Social Interactions.” Cognitive Development 23: 136–154.10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 1994. The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Warnock, M., B. Norwich, and L. Terzi. 2010. Special Educational Needs: A New Look. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar