Tiered intervention: history and trends in Finland and the United States

References

• Basic Education Act 628/1998. Amendments up to 1136/2010. 2010. Government of Finland. http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf (accessed May 12, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Björn, P. M., M. T. Aro, T. K. Koponen, L. S. Fuchs, and D. H. Fuchs. 2015. “The Many Faces of Special Education within RTI Frameworks in the United States and Finland.” Learning Disability Quarterly E-pub ahead of the print. doi:10.1177/0731948715594787.10.1177/001440291007600304
   Google Scholar
• Boynton Hauerwas, L., R. Brown, and A. N. Scott. 2013. “Specific Learning Disability and Response to Intervention: State-level Guidance.” Exceptional Children 80 (1): 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callender, W. 2007. The Idaho Results-based Model: Implementing Response to Intervention Statewide. In Handbook of Response to Intervention, edited by S. Jimerson, M. Burns, and A. VanDerHeyden, 331–342. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-49053-3
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, G., J. Travers, M. McLinden, C. Robertson, E. Smith, N. Macnab, S. Powers, et al. 2012. Measuring Educational Engagement, Progress and Outcomes for Children with Special Educational Needs: A Review. NCSE research reports no 11. Meath Co: National Council for Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M., M. Atkins, D. Cullinan, K. Kutash, and R. Weaver. 2008. Reducing Behavior Problems in the Elementary School Classroom: A Practice Guide ( NCEE #2008-012). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Accessed March 30, 2014. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. 2011. Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman muutokset ja täydennykset 2010 [The Amendments of the National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2010]. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L., and M. J. McLaughlin. 2008. “Disability Classification in Education.” In Disability Classification in Education. Issues and Perspectives, edited by L. Florian, and M. J. McLaughlin, 3–10. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., L. S. Fuchs, and P. M. Stecker. 2010. “The ‘Blurring’ of Special Education in a New Continuum of General Education Placements and Services.” Exceptional Children 76 (3): 301–323.10.1177/001440291007600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., L. S. Fuchs, and D. L. Compton. 2012. “Smart RTI: A Next-generation Approach to Multilevel Prevention.” Exceptional Children 78 (3): 263–279.10.1177/001440291207800301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, L. J., and M. Jahnukainen. 2011. “Wherefore Art Thou, Inclusion? Analysing the Development of Inclusive Education in New South Wales, Alberta and Finland.” Journal of Education Policy 26 (2): 261–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haager, D. 2008. “Early Intervention for Students in General Education. Promoting Academic Achievement for All.” In Education for All. Critical Issues in the Education of Children and Youth with Disabilities, edited by T. C. Jiménez and V. L. Graf, 67–185. San Francisco: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, J., J. Kuusela, and T. Mänty. 1996. “Erityisopettajien valmistuminen suomessa 1960–1994 [Special Education Teacher Graduation in Finland 1960–1994].” In Erityisopetuksen tila [The Current State of Special Education], edited by H. Blom, R. Laukkanen, A. Lindström, U. Saresma, and P. Virtanen, 75–80. Helsinki: National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. 2006. New Directions in Education Policy Implementation: Confronting Complexity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. 2004 20 U.S.C. 2004. Public Law. 108–446. Accessed October 19, 2013. http://www.nasponline.org/advocacy/IDEA2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disability Education Act. 1990. 20 U.S.C. 1990. Public Law 101–476. Accessed July 4, 2013. http://uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/101/476.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disability Education Act Amendments of 1997. 1997. 20 U.S.C. 1997. Public Law. 105–117. Accessed July 4, 2013. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.php
   Google Scholar
• Itkonen, T. 2009. “Stories of Hope and Decline: Interest Group Effectiveness in National Special Education Policy.” Educational Policy 23 (1): 43–65.10.1177/0895904808328526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itkonen, T., and M. Jahnukainen. 2007. “An Analysis of Accountability Policies in Finland and the United States.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 54 (1): 5–23.10.1080/10349120601149664
   Google Scholar
• Itkonen, T., and M. Jahnukainen. 2010. “Disability or Learning Difficulty? Politicians or Educators? Constructing Special Education in Finland and the United States.” Comparative Sociology 9 (2): 182–201.10.1163/156913210X12536181351033
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. 2005a. “Education in the Prevention of Social Exclusion.” The Review of Disability Studies 1 (3): 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. 2005b. “Koulutus syrjäytymisen ehkäisyssä [Education in the Prevention of Social Exclusion].” In Selviytymisen polkuja. Opetusjärjestelyt oppilaan tukena [Paths of Survival. Teaching Arrangements as a Students Support], edited by P. Koivula, 40–50. National Board of Education in Finland. Vammala: Vammalan kirjapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. 2011. “Different Strategies, Different Outcomes? The History and Trends of the Inclusive and Special Education in Alberta (Canada) and in Finland.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 55 (5): 489–502.10.1080/00313831.2010.537689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. 2013. “Two Models of ‘Education for All’. A Comparative View on the Inclusive and Special Education Politics in Alberta and Finland.” In Rethinking Equity: Creating a Great School for All, edited by S. Murgatroyd and J.-C. Couture, 81–104. Edmonton: The Alberta Teachers’ Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. 2015. “Inclusion, Integration, or What? A Comparative Study of the School Principals’ Perceptions of Inclusive and Special Education in Finland and in Alberta.” Canada. Disability & Society 30 (1): 59–72. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.982788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M. 1999. “How We Prevent the Prevention of Emotional and Behavioural Disorders.” Exceptional Children 65 (4): 448–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirjavainen, T. 2010. Esiselvitysraportti: Erityisopetuksen vaikuttavuus perusopetuksesssa [Report of the Preliminary Study: The Effectiveness of Special Education in Compulsory Education]. Helsinki: National Audit Office of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Kirjavainen, T., J. Pulkkinen, and M. Jahnukainen. 2014. “Perusopetuksen erityisopetusjärjestelyt eri ikäryhmissä vuosina 2001–2010.” [Special Education Arrangements in Basic Education for Different Age Cohorts in Years 2001–2010.] Kasvatus – The Finnish Journal of Education 45 (2): 152–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kivinen, O., and J. Kivirauma. 1989. “Special Education as a Part of the School System and as a Classification System: The Case of Finland in the Twentieth Century.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 33 (1): 67–78.10.1080/0031383890330105
   Google Scholar
• Kovaleski, J. 2007. “Potential Pitfalls of Response to Intervention.” In Handbook of Response to Intervention, edited by S. Jimerson, M. Burns, and A. VanDerHeyden, 80–89. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-49053-3
   Google Scholar
• Mahitivanichcha, K., and T. Parrish. 2005. “The Implications of Fiscal Incentives on Identification Rates and Placement in Special Education: Formulas for Influencing Best Practice.” Journal of Education Finance 31 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Malinen, O.-P., P. Väisänen, and H. Savolainen. 2012. “Teacher Education in Finland: A Review of a National Effort for Preparing Teachers for the Future.” Curriculum Journal 23 (4): 567–584.10.1080/09585176.2012.731011
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, K., L. D. MacKay, T. Andreou, J. A. Brown, S. Mathews, C. Gietz, and J. Bennett. 2011. “Response to Intervention in Canada: Definitions, the Evidence Base, and Future Directions.” Canadian Journal of School Psychology 26 (1): 18–43.10.1177/0829573511400857
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, J. A., and R. B. Lewis. 2008. Assessing Students with Special Needs. 7th ed. Columbus, OH: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2007. Erityisopetuksen strategia [Special education strategy]. Reports of the Ministry of Education 2007: 47. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2014. What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education? Using Evidence-based Teaching Strategies. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left behind Act of 2001. 20 U.S.C. 2001. Public Law 107–110. January 8, 2002. Accessed November 20, 2013. http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. 2009. “Dilemmas of Difference and the Identification of Special Educational Needs/Disability: International Perspectives.” British Educational Research Journal 35 (3): 447–467.10.1080/01411920802044446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., K. M. Bocian, K. D. Beach, V. Sanchez, and L. J. Flynn. 2013. “Special Education in a 4-year Response to Intervention (RtI) Environment: Characteristics of Students with Learning Disability and Grade of Identification.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 28 (3): 98–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official Statistics of Finland. 2012. Special Education [E-Publication]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Accessed November 20, 2013. http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/erop/2012/erop_2012_2013-06-12_tie_001_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Pesonen, H., T. Itkonen, M. Jahnukainen, E. Kontu, T. Kokko, T. Ojala, and R. Pirttimaa. 2015. “The Implementation of New Special Education Legislation in Finland.” Educational Policy 29 (1): 162–178. doi:10.1177/0895904814556754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijl, S. J., and H. Veneman. 2005. “Evaluating New Criteria and Procedures for Funding Special Needs Education in the Netherlands.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 33 (1): 93–108.10.1177/1741143205048176
   Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen, J., and M. Jahnukainen. 2015. Finnish Reform of the Funding and Provision of Special Education: The Views of Principals and Municipal Education Administration. Educational Review: E-pub ahead of Publication. doi:10.1080/00131911.2015.1060586.
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 29 U.S.C. 1973. Section 504. Accessed February 7, 2015. http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/sec504.htm
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. G., and J. J. W. Powell. 2011. Comparing Special Education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.11126/stanford/9780804760737.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. 2011. Finnish Lessons. What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shonkoff, J. P., and S. J. Meisels. 2000. Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511529320
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. 2013. “What is Wrong with the ‘What-went-right’ Approach in Education Policy?” European Educational Research Journal 12 (1): 20–33.10.2304/eerj
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, E., M. Solis, S. Ciullo, and J. W. McKenna. 2012. “Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions and Instructional Practices in Response to Intervention Implementation.” Learning Disability Quarterly 35 (2): 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2013. “A Review of Thinking and Research about Inclusive Education Policy, Suggestions for a New Kind of Inclusive Thinking.” British Educational Research Journal 39 (3): 473–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuneberg, H., J. Hautamäki, R. Ahtiainen, M. Lintuvuori, M.-P. Vainikainen, and T. Hilasvuori. 2014. “Conceptual Change in Adopting the Nationwide Special Education Strategy in Finland.” Journal of Educational Change 15 (1): 37–56.10.1007/s10833-013-9213-x
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., and C. A. Denton. 2008. “The Role of Intervention.” In Response to Intervention: A Framework for Reading Educators, edited by D. Fuchs, L. S. Fuchs and S. Vaughn, 51–70. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., and L. S. Fuchs. 2003. “Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 18 (3): 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherley, R., and M. Lipsky. 1977. “Street-Level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special-education Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 47 (2): 171–197.10.17763/haer.47.2.v870r1v16786270x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, D., and M. Jahnukainen. 2010. “Difficulties Associated with the Coding and Categorization of Students with Emotional and Behavioural Disabilities in Alberta.” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 15 (3): 181–187.10.1080/13632752.2010.497655
   Google Scholar