Creating an optimal environment for inclusive education: co-location and transformation in interdisciplinary collaboration

References

• Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and L. Empson. 2008. “The Construction of Organizational Identity: Comparative Case Studies of Consulting Firms.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 24 (1): 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R. 2001. “Trust, Power and Control in Trans-organizational Relations.” Organization Studies 22 (2): 337–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, N., and C. Huxham. 2003. “Cycles of Identity Formation in Interorganizational Collaborations.” International Studies of Management & Organization 33 (3): 28–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2003.11043686.
   Google Scholar
• Brattström, A., and R. Bachmann. 2018. “Cooperation and Coordination: The Role of Trust in Inter-organizational Relationships.” In The Routledge Companion to Trust, edited by Searle, Rosalind H., Ann-Marie I. Nienaber, and Sim B. Sitkin, 129–142. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J., S. Mccluskey, E. Turley, and N. King. 2015. “The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 12 (2): 202–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555–568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vroey, A., E. Struyf, and K. Petry. 2016. “Secondary Schools Included: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 20 (2): 109–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1075609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2007. “Relational Agency in Professional Practice: A Chat Analysis.” Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory 1 (3): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2009. “From the Systemic to the Relational: Relational Agency and Activity Theory.” In Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory, 197–211. New York: NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., H. Daniels, T. Gallagher, J. Leadbetter, and P. Warmington. 2009. Improving Inter-professional Collaborations: Multi-agency Working for Children’s Wellbeing. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., C. Montecinos, J. Cádiz, P. Jorratt, L. Manriquez, and C. Rojas. 2017. “Working Relationally on Complex Problems: Building Capacity for Joint Agency in New Forms of Work.” In Agency at Work, 229–247. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N., and S. Ybema. 2010. “Marketing Identities: Shifting Circles of Identification in Inter-organizational Relationships.” Organization Studies 31 (3): 279–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609357397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2010. “Activity Theory and Learning at Work.” In The Sage Handbook of Workplace Learning, edited by M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, and B. N. O’conner, 86–104. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2015. Learning by Expanding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eteläpelto, A., K. Vähäsantanen, P. Hökkä, and S. Paloniemi. 2013. “What Is Agency? Conceptualizing Professional Agency at Work.” Educational Research Review 10: 45–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. 2000. “Can We Trust Trust.” Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations 13: 213–237.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdes, J., S. L. Goei, M. Huizinga, and D. De Ruyter. 2020. “Analytic Framework for Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Inclusive Education.” Journal of Workplace Learning ahead-of-print (ahead–of–print). doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-08-2019-0099.
   Google Scholar
• Gubbels, J., K. M. Coppens, and I. De Wolf. 2018. “Inclusive Education in the Netherlands: How Funding Arrangements and Demographic Trends Relate to Dropout and Participation Rates.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (11): 1137–1153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1416684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelman, A. T. 2001. “Collaborative Empowerment.” American Journal of Community Psychology 29 (2): 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N. 2012. “Doing Template Analysis.” In Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges, 426. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., and L. A. Oerlemans. 2006. “Proximity and Inter‐organizational Collaboration: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Management Reviews 8 (2): 71–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, P., G. Ledoux, A. Karssen, A. Meijden, and R. Petit. 2015. Vervolgmeting 1 Kengetallen Passend Onderwijs. Amsterdam: Kohnstamm Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. 2011. Focus Group Methodology: Principle and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mcnamara, M. 2012. “Starting to Untangle the Web of Cooperation, Coordination, and Collaboration: A Framework for Public Managers.” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (6): 389–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.655527.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. 2008. “Special Schools: What Future for Special Schools and Inclusion? Conceptual and Professional Perspectives.” British Journal of Special Education 35 (3): 136–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00387.x.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., L. Lipponen, and K. Hakkarainen. 2004. “Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning.” Review of Educational Research 74 (4): 557–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paloniemi, S., and M. Goller. 2017. “The Multifaceted Nature of Agency and Professional Learning.” In Agency at Work, 465–478. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., Y. Engeström, and M. Lemos. 2016. “Formative Interventions for Expansive Learning and Transformative Agency.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 25 (4): 599–633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2005. “Beyond the Dilemma of Difference: The Capability Approach to Disability and Special Educational Needs 39(3),443-459.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (3): 16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2005.00447.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. 2019. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis. communicating impact: Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J. 2006. “Dilemmas in Building Shared Transformative Agency. 3 (3-1).” Activités 3: 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Waitoller, F. R., and E. B. Kozleski. 2013. “Working in Boundary Practices: Identity Development and Learning in Partnerships for Inclusive Education teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies.” Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 31 (3): 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.006.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York, NY: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar