The educational context in expert assessments. A study of special education documents of children in ECEC institutions

References

• Barton, L. 1997. “Inclusive Education: Romantic, Subversive or Realistic?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 1 (3): 231–242. doi:10.1080/1360311970010301.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, edited by H. Cooper, 57–71. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13620-004.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. L., V. B. Kovac, and A. D. Tveit. 2011. En undersøkelse om PP-tjenestens arbeid med barnehagen [A study of Educational-Pedagogical Services’ Work in Kindergarten]. Skriftserien nr. 155. Kristiansand: Universitetet i Agder. https://www.udir.no/globalassets/upload/barnehage/forskning_og_statistikk/rapporter/rapport_ppt_og_barnehagen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. 2014. “Analysing Documents.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 367–379. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. 2004. “Textual Agency: How Texts Do Things in Organizational Settings.” Organization 11 (3): 373–393. doi:10.1177/1350508404041998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. T., and A. A. Rizzo. 1974. “A Paradigm for Humanizing Special Education.” The Journal of Special Education 8 (4): 321–329. doi:10.1177/002246697400800404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., and A. Duranti. 1992. “Rethinking Context: An Introduction.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halldén, O. 1999. “Conceptual Change and Contextualization.” In New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, edited by W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, and M. Carretero, 53–65. Oxford: Pergamon, Elsevier Science
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, N. 2020. “Constructing Appropriate Information in School Transition. Documents as Institutional Agents of Topicalising Children’s (In) Capabilities and Pedagogical Practices.” In Documentation in Institutional Contexts of Early Childhood, edited by M. Alasuutari, H. Kelle, and H. Knauf, 79–101. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, N., M. Alasuutari, and T. Vehkakoski. 2018. “Positioning Children with Special Educational Needs in Early Childhood Education and Care Documents.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 39 (6): 827–843. doi:10.1080/01425692.2018.1426443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlofsen, C. 2014. “Spesialundervisningens tiltakskjede–lokal praksis sett i forhold til regelverk og retningslinjer.” [Chain of Action in Special Education – Local Practices Compared to Regulations and Guidelines]. PhD diss., University of Oslo. https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/49867/PhD-Herlofsen.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, J., R. Lindqvist, and E. Bergström. 2007. “School Problems or Individual Shortcomings? A Study of Individual Educational Plans in Sweden.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 22 (1): 75–91. doi:10.1080/08856250601082323.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, K. 2016. “Analysing Documents through Fieldwork.” In Qualitative Research, edited by D. Silverman, 155–170. 4th ed. London/Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jortveit, M., A. D. Tveit, D. L. Cameron, and G. Lindqvist. 2020. “A Comparative Study of Norwegian and Swedish Special Educators’ Beliefs and Practices.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 35 (3): 350–365. doi:10.1080/08856257.2019.1689716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindergarten Act. [2006] 2021. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2005-06-17-64#KAPITTEL_7
   Google Scholar
• Kolnes, J., and U. V. Midthassel. 2021. Capturing students’ needs through collaboration - exploring challenges experienced by Norwegian educational-psychological advisers. European Journal of Special Needs Education 1–15. 10.1080/08856257.2021.1885175
   Google Scholar
• Løkken, G., and T. Moser. 2012. “Space and Materiality in Early Childhood Pedagogy – Introductory Notes.” Education Inquiry 3 (3): 303–315. doi:10.3402/edui.v3i3.22036.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., M. Morton, and G. Hornby. 2010. Review of the Literature on Individual Education Plans. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, T., M. Rismark, A. S. Samuelsen, and A. M. Sølvberg. 2018. “The Norwegian Educational Psychological Service: A Systematic Review of Research from the Period 2000-2015.” Nordic Studies in Education 38 (2): 101–117. doi:10.18261/.1891-5949-2018-02-02.
   Google Scholar
• Nordahl, T., B. Persson, C. B. Dyssegaard, B. W. Hennestad, M. V. Wang, J. Martinsen, E. K. Vold, P. Paulsrud, and T. Johnsen. 2018. Inkluderende Fellesskap For Barn Og Unge [Inclusive Communities for Children and Youth]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Nordtømme, S. 2012. “Place, Space and Materiality for Pedagogy in a Kindergarten.” Education Inquiry 3 (3): 317–333. doi:10.3402/edui.v3i3.22037.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Education. 2020. Stortingsmelding 6 (2019-2020) Tett på – tidlig innsats og inkluderende fellesskap i barnehage, skole og SFO [White Paper 6 Early Intervention and Inclusive Education in Kindergartens, Schools and Out-of-school-hours Care]. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/3dacd48f7c94401ebefc91549a5d08cd/no/pdfs/stm201920200006000dddpdfs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Official Norwegian Report. 2019 :3. Nye sjanser – bedre læring. Kjønnsforskjeller I skoleprestasjoner og utdanningsløp [New Chances – Better Learning. Gender Disparaties in School Achievements and Educational Pathways]. https://files.nettsteder.regjeringen.no/wpuploads01/blogs.dir/241/files/2019/02/nou201920190003000dddpdfs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Palla, L. 2015. “Specialpedagogik I Förskolan: En Forskningsöversikt.” In Förskola: Tidig Intervention – SKOLFORSK, edited by I. Tallberg Broman, A. C. Vallberg Roth, L. Palla, and S. Persson, 96–120. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Palla, L. 2018. “Individcentrerad prestation och måluppfyllelse i förskolan?: När åtgärdsprogram blir examinerande dokument och verktyg i specialpedagogiska processer.” Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige 23 (1–2): 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Palla, L. 2019. “Characteristics of Nordic Research on Special Education in Preschool: A Review with Special Focus on Swedish Conditions.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (4): 436–453. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1441337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2008. “Repositioning Documents in Social Research.” Sociology 42 (5): 821–836. doi:10.1177/0038038508094564.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2016. “Using Documents in Social Research.” In Qualitative Research, edited by D. Silverman, 171–185. 4th ed. London/Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rix, J. 2009. “Statutory Assessment of the Class? Supporting the Additional Needs of the Learning Context.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 13 (3): 253–272. doi:10.1080/13603110701433956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rix, J., and A. Matthews. 2014. “Viewing the Child as a Participant within Context.” Disability & Society 29 (9): 1428–1442. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.934955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røn Larsen, M. 2016. ““May I Please Tell You a Little Anecdote?” Inter-Professional Decision-Making about Inclusion in the Borderland between General and Special Schooling.” International Journal on School Disaffection 12 (1): 65–84. doi:10.18546/IJSD.12.1.04.
   Google Scholar
• Sando, O. J., and E. B. H. Sandseter. 2020. “Affordances for Physical Activity and Well-being in the ECEC Outdoor Environment.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 69: 101430. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, D. 1996. “Towards an Integrated Theoretical Framework for Research into Special Educational Needs.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 11 (1): 33–47. doi:10.1080/0885625960110103.
   Google Scholar
• Solli, K.-A. 2010. “Inkludering og spesialpedagogiske tiltak – motsetninger eller to sider av samme sak?” Tidsskriftet FoU i praksis 4 (1): 27–45. https://docplayer.me/366663-Inkludering-og-spesialpedagogiske-tiltak-motsetninger-eller-to-sider-av-samme-sak.html
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. 2017a. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/sarskilte-behov/spesialpedagogisk-hjelp/Spesialpedagogisk-hjelp/
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. 2017b. https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/samarbeid/pp-tjenesten/hva-gjor-pp-tjenesten/
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. 2020. https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/finn-forskning/tema/fakta-om-barnehager-2020/spesialpedagogisk-hjelp/
   Google Scholar
• Tjora, A. 2018. Qualitative Research as Stepwise-Deductive Induction. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780203730072.
   Google Scholar
• Tveitnes, M. S. 2018. “Sakkyndighet med mål og mening.” [ Expert-knowledge with Goals and Purpose]. PhD diss., University of Stavanger. https://uis.brage.unit.no/uis-xmlui/handle/11250/2499868
   Google Scholar
• Wendelborg, C., J. Caspersen, A. M. Kittelsaa, S. Svendsen, A. S. Haugset, T. Kongsvik, and R. B. Reiling. 2015. Barnehagetilbudet til barn med særlige behov [Services Provided to Children with Special Needs in Kindergarten]. Rapport 2015. Trondheim: NTNU Samfunnsforskning AS, Mangfold og inkludering. https://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/tall-og-forskning/forskningsrapporter/barnehagetilbudet_til_barn_med_sarlige_behov.pdf
   Google Scholar