A cross-sectional study on reading among young L1 and L2 students in Sweden

References

• Batt, E. G. 2008. “Teachers’ Perceptions of ELL Education: Potential Solutions to Overcome the Greatest Challenges.” Multicultural Education 15 (3): 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. B. 2011. Understanding Advanced Second-language Reading. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., D. Kim, and S. Jeong. 2021. “Evidence-based Reading Interventions for English Language Learners: A Multilevel Meta-analysis.” Heliyon 7 (9): e07985. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1979).“Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children.“ Review of educational research 49 (2), 222–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. M. B., and R. Keijzer. 2000. “What Is Hard to Learn Is Easy to Forget: The Roles of Word Concreteness, Cognate Status, and Word Frequency in Foreign-language Vocabulary Learning and Forgetting.” Language Learning 50: 1–56. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droop, M., and L. Verhoeven. 2003. “Language Proficiency and Reading Ability in First‐and Second‐language Learners.” Reading Research Quarterly 38 (1): 78–103. doi:10.1598/RRQ.38.1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., and P. D. Pearson. 2009. “Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Education 189 (1–2): 107–122. doi:10.1177/0022057409189001-208.
   Google Scholar
• Fälth, L., S. Gustafson, E. Kugelberg, and T. Nordström 2017. LegiLexis formativa bedömningsverktyg-Testmanual.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, U., and K. Taube. 2001. Läsning bland elever med invandrarbakgrund: En undersökning av läsförmåga och bakgrundsfaktorer hos elever i årskurs 3 i Stockholm 1993–96 [Reading among students with an immigrant background: A study of reading ability and background factors in students in grade 3 in Stockholm 1993–96]. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för internationell pedagogik.
   Google Scholar
• Ganuza, N., and C. Hedman. 2015. “Struggles for Legitimacy in Mother Tongue Instruction in Sweden.” Language and Education 29 (2): 125–139. doi:10.1080/09500782.2014.978871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geva, E., and M. Wang. 2001. “The Development of Basic Reading Skills in Children: A Crosslanguage Perspective.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21: 182–204. doi:10.1017/S0267190501000113.
   Google Scholar
• Gottardo, A., and J. Mueller. 2009. “Are First and Second Language Factors Related in Predicting L2 Reading Comprehension? A Study of Spanish-speaking Children Acquiring English as A Second Language from First to Second Grade.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101: 330–344. doi:10.1037/a0014320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., and W. E. Tunmer. 1986. “Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability.” Remedial and Special Education: RASE 7 (1): 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. 2009. Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, A. E., H. Danielsson, T. Nordström, and L. Fälth 2021. “No Learning Loss in Sweden during the Pandemic: Evidence from Primary School Reading Assessments.” Submitted
   Google Scholar
• Herbers, J. E., J. J. Cutuli, L. M. Supkoff, D. Heistad, C. K. Chan, E. Hinz, A. S. Masten, et al. 2012. “Early Reading Skills and Academic Achievement Trajectories of Students Facing Poverty, Homelessness, and High Residential Mobility.” Educational Researcher 41: 366–374. doi:10.3102/0013189X12445320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., and P. B. Gough. 1990. “The Simple View of Reading.” Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2: 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, M. R., P. Koh, Y. Cheng, S. H. Marinova-Todd, and X. Chen. 2021. “The Simple View of Reading in French Second Language Learners.” Learning and Individual Differences 92: 102082. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., M. Stevens, P. Mandera, and M. Brysbaert. 2015. “Word Knowledge in the Crowd: Measuring Vocabulary Size and Word Prevalence in a Massive Online Experiment.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (8): 1665–1692. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda, K. 2005. Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross-linguistic Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LegiLexi. 2021. Kontakta oss [ Contact us]. https://legilexi.org/kontakt/
   Google Scholar
• Lervåg, A., and V. G. Aukrust. 2010. “Vocabulary Knowledge Is a Critical Determinant of the Difference in Reading Comprehension Growth between First and Second Language Learners.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51 (5): 612–620. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02185.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., A. A. Rupp, and L. S. Siegel. 2007. “Growth in Reading Skills of Children from Diverse Linguistic Backgrounds: Findings from a 5-year Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (4): 821. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCardle, P., H. S. Scarborough, and H. W. Catts. 2001. “Predicting, Explaining, and Preventing Children’s Reading Difficulties.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 16 (4): 230–239. doi:10.1111/0938-8982.00023.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., C. Brock, V. Zygouris‐Coe, C. H. Brock, and V. I. (Vicky) Zygouris‐Coe. 2021. “Instructional Casualties: A Review of Transforming Literacy Education for Long-Term English Learners: Recognizing Brilliance in the Undervalued.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 64 (5): 604–607. doi:10.1002/jaal.1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K. 2009 Reading comprehension and vocabulary: what´s the connection? Wagner, R.K., Schatschneider, C., Phythian-Sence, C. eds. Beyond Decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension. Guilford Press. 176–194.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. 2000. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, J., and M. Axelsson. 2013. “‘Welcome to Sweden’: Newly Arrived Students’ Experiences of Pedagogical and Social Provision in Introductory and Regular Classes.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 6 (1): 137–164.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquarella, A., A. Gottardo, and A. Grant. 2012. “Comparing Factors Related to Reading Comprehension in Adolescents Who Speak English as a First (L1) or Second (L2) Language.” Scientific Studies of Reading 16 (6): 475–503. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.593066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. 1998. “Two Basic Questions about Reading and Learning to Read.” In Problems and Interventions in Literacy Development, edited by P. Reitsma and L. Verhoeven, 15–48. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2772-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., N. Landi, and J. Oakhill. 2005. “The Acquisition of Reading Comprehension Skill.” In The Science of Reading: A Handbook, edited by M. J. Snowling and C. Hulme, 227–247. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• PIRLS. 2011. “Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.” IEA. Accessed 9 December 2021 https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/pirls
   Google Scholar
• PIRLS. 2016. “Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.” IEA. Accessed 9 December 2021 https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/pirls
   Google Scholar
• PISA. 2012. “Programme for International Student Assessment.OECD.” Accessed 9 December 2021 https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
   Google Scholar
• PISA. 2015. “Programme for International Student Assessment.” OECD. Accessed 9 December 2021 https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
   Google Scholar
• PISA. 2018. “Programme for International Student Assessment.” OECD. Accessed 9 December 2021 https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
   Google Scholar
• Purves, A. C., Ed. 1991. The Idea of Difficulty in Literature. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, D. K., Y. Petscher, and A. J. Truckenmiller. 2017. “The Contribution of General Reading Ability to Science Achievement.” Reading Research Quarterly 52 (2): 253–266. doi:10.1002/rrq.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2014. “Size and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge: What the Research Shows.” Language Learning 64 (4): 913–951. doi:10.1111/lang.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R., and M. Verhallen. 2008. “The Assessment of Deep Word Knowledge in Young First and Second Language Learners.” Language Testing 25 (2): 211–236. doi:10.1177/0265532207086782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, M. (1998). ”A comparison of L1 and L2 reading: Cultural differences and schema.” The internet TESL journal 4 (10): 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. 2000. Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Statistic Sweden. 2020. Uppväxtvillkor för barn med utländsk bakgrund [Childhood conditions for children with immigrant bakground]. Stockholm: SCB.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2015. “Swedish National Exams.” Accessed 13 December 2021 https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik/sok-statistik-om-forskola-skola-och-vuxenutbildning?sok=SokB&run=1
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2019. “Swedish National Exams.” Accessed 13 December 2021 https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik/sok-statistik-om-forskola-skola-och-vuxenutbildning?sok=SokB&run=1
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, K. R., J. K. Torgesen, and R. K. Wagner. 2006. “Relationships between Word Knowledge and Reading Comprehension in Third-grade Children.” Scientific Studies of Reading 10 (4): 381–398. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. P., and V. P. Collier. 2002. A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long-term Academic Achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Centerfor Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence, University of California-SantaCruz.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2018. “Functional Literacy and Numeracy: Definitions and Options for Measurement of SDG 4.6.” GAML Fifth Meeting 17–18 October 2018 Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelderen, A., R. Schoonen, K. De Glopper, J. Hulstijn, P. Snellings, A. Simis, and M. Stevenson. 2003. “Roles of Linguistic Knowledge, Metacognitive Knowledge and Processing Speed in L3, L2 and L1 Reading Comprehension: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” International Journal of Bilingualism 7 (1): 7–25. doi:10.1177/13670069030070010201.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., and J. van Leeuwe. 2012. “The Simple View of Second Language Reading Throughout the Primary Grades.” Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 25 (8): 1805˗1818. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9346-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar