Collaborative Problem-Solving in the Cross-Border Context: Learning from Paired Local Communities along the Russian Border

References

• Amurskaya Pravda. 2013. Amurskaya Pravda priglashaet v Kitai [Amurskaya pravda invites to China]. http://www.ampravda.ru/2013/04/26/038329.html.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, James, Liam O’Dowd, and Tom Wilson. 2003. Culture, Co-operation and Borders. European Studies: A Journal of European Culture, History and Politics 19, no. 1: 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, Caroline, and Michael Goldsmith. 1998. From Local Government to Local Governance – And Beyond? International Political Science Review 19, no. 2: 101–117. doi: 10.1177/019251298019002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apap, Joanna, and Angelina Tchorbadijska. 2004. What about the Neighbours? The Impact of Schengen along the EU’s External Borders. CEPS Working Paper no. 210.
   Google Scholar
• Aristov, Lev, and Iryna Khanipova. 2012. Postroenie vneshnikh svyazey munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problem i puti ikh preodoleniya. [Construction of External Ties of Municipal Units of the Russian Federation: Problems and Solutions]. Economics, State, Society Journal 11, no. 4. http://ego.uapa.ru/ru-ru/issue/2012/04/11/.
   Google Scholar
• Basadur, Min, Pam Pringle, Gwen Speranzini, and Bacot Marie. 2000. Collaborative Problem Solving Through Creativity in Problem Definition: Expanding the Pie. Creativity and Innovation Management 9, no. 1: 54–76. doi: 10.1111/1467-8691.00157
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Maria, and Sören Kock. 2000. “Coopetition” in Business Networks—To Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management 29: 411–426. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00067-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benington, John, and Mark H. Moore. 2010. Public Value: Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Seth, and Stuart Ablon. 2011. Collaborative Problem Solving: An Effective Approach for Managing Conflict in the Workplace. http://www.mediate.com/articles/BernsteinS1.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Blagov, Sergei. 2005. Russia Hails Border Deal with China Despite Criticism. The Jamestown Foundation. www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=30445#.VBg6B5R_un0.
   Google Scholar
• Bolotov, Dmitry, Nikolay Mezhevich, and Vladimir Shuraev. 2005. Prigranichnoe (mezhdunarodnoe) sotrudnichestvo v sisteme mezhmunitsipal’nogo vzaimodejstvija [Cross-border (International) Cooperation in the System of Intermunicipal Interactions]. St. Petersburg: Polytechnical University Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Bomsdorf, Clemens. 2010. Alles dreht sich um Kirkenes. Financial Times Deutschland. http://www.pikene.no/files/attachments/0000/0830/nopolkirkenesnabelftdbomsdorf2010316.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Borge, Lars-Erik. 2010. Local Government in Norway. In Local Public Sector in Transition: A Nordic Perspective, ed. Moisio A. Helsinki, 95–121. https://www.vatt.fi/file/vatt_publication_pdf/j56.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brednikova, Olga, and Victor Voronkov. 1998. Granitsa I rekonstruirovanie sotsial’nogo prostranstva (sluchay Narvy-Ivangoroda). [Border and Reconstruction of Social Space (The Case of Narva-Ivangorod)]. http://www.indepsocres.spb.ru/bredvv_r.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Budarick, John. 2014. Media and the Limits of Transnational Solidarity: Unanswered Questions in the Relationship between Diaspora, Communication and Community. Global Media and Communication 10, no. 2: 139–153. doi: 10.1177/1742766514540070
   Google Scholar
• Buffington, Robert. 1994. Prohibition in the Borderlands: National Government-Border Community Relations. Pacific Historical Review 63: 19–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3640667. doi: 10.2307/3640667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buursink, Jan. 2001. The Binational Reality of Border–Crossing Cities. GeoJournal 54: 7–19. doi: 10.1023/A:1021180329607
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, Janice L. 2006. Local Government Reform in China: A Rational Actor Perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences 72, no. 2: 253–267. doi: 10.1177/0020852306064613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Lei. 1994. A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and Validity. Applied Psychological Measurement 18, no. 3: 205–215. doi: 10.1177/014662169401800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China National Bureau of Statistics. 2012. 2010 National Population Census of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: China National Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Jae Ho, and Tao-Chui Lam. 2009. China’s Local Administration: Traditions and Changes in the Sub-National Hierarchy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Rougement, Denis. 1978. L’avenir est notre affaire. ed. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, Antoine, Frédéric Durand, Christophe Sohn, and Olivier Walther. 2010. Spatial Integration in European Cross-Border Metropolitan Regions: A Comparative Approach. CEPS Instead working papers. WP no. 2010–40.
   Google Scholar
• Del Biaggio, Cristina. 2015. Investigating Regional Identities within the Pan-Alpine Governance System: The Presence or Absence of Identification with a “Community of Problems” Among Local Political Actors. Environmental Science and Policy 49: 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppisch, Sonja. 2012. Governance Processes in Euregios. Evidence from Six Cases across the Austrian–German Border. Planning Practice and Research 27, no. 3: 315–332. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.670937
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers, Nicole. 2007. The Binational City Eurode: The Social Legitimacy of a Border-Crossing Town. Dissertation. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Federal’nyi zakon. No. 131-FZ. 2003. [Federal Law No. 131 of 6 October 2003]. Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [On General Principles of Local Selfgovernment Organization in the Russian Federation]. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_44571/.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, Ron. 1991. The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable? Marketing Bulletin 2: 66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, R., I. Chengalur-Smith, and P. Duchessi. 2007. Collaborative E-Government: Impediments and Benefits of Information-Sharing Projects in the Public Sector. European Journal of Information Systems 16: 121–133. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gritsenko, Evgeniy. 2003. Prigranichnoe sotrudnichestvo munitsipal’nykh obrazovaniy v sisteme mezhmunitsipal’nykh svyazei: znachenie nemetskogo I evropeiskogo opyta dlya rossiyskoy teorii I praktiki [Cross-Border Cooperation at the Municipal Level in the System of International and Intermunicipal Ties: The Role of German and European Experience for Russian Theory and Practice]. Academic Law Journal 3, no. 13. http://www.advo.irk.ru/150-prigranichnoe-sotrudnichestvo-municipalnyx-obrazovanij-v-sisteme-mezhgosudarstvennyx-i-mezhmunicipalnyx-svyazej-znachenie-nemeckogo-i-evropejskogo-opyta-dlya-rossijskoj-teorii-i-praktiki.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, Sara, and Patricia Murphy. 1999. The Potential for Collaborative Problem Solving in Design and Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 9, no. 1: 1–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1008855526312
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, Friedrich, Esther Care, Juergen Buder, Kai Sassenberg and Patrick Griffin. 2015 . A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills. In: Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer Netherlands, 2015, 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Imatra municipality. 2013. General Information. http://www.imatra.fi/
   Google Scholar
• Izotov, Alexander, and Jussi Laine. 2013. Constructing (Un)familiarity: Role of Tourism in Identity and Region Building at the Finnish–Russian Border. European Planning Studies 21: 91–111. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.716241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jánczak, Jaroslaw. 2011. Cross-Border Governance in Central European Border Twin Towns. In De-Bordering, Re-Bordering and Symbols on the European Boundaries, ed. Jaroslaw Janczak, 37–52. Berlin: Collegium Polonicum & Logos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Järviö, Pekka. 2012. Border Management on the Finnish-Russian Border. In: Ex Borea Lux? – Learning from the Finnish and Norwegian Cross-border Cooperation Experience on their Eastern Borders. Prague: Institute of Stability and Development, 2012, 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Järviö, Pekka, and Atle Staalesen. 2012. Local Border Traffic Agreements. Case Norway-Russia. In: Ex Borea Lux? – Learning from the Finnish and Norwegian Cross-border Cooperation Experience on their Eastern Borders. Prague: Institute of Stability and Development, 2012, 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, Pertti, and Alexander Sergunin. 2011. City-Twinning in Northern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities. Research Journal of International Studies 22: 120–131.
   Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, Pertti, and Alexander Sergunin. 2014. Paradiplomacy as a Capacity-Building Strategy: The Case of Russia’s Northwestern Subnational Actors. Problems of Post-Communism 61, no. 6: 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, Jan. 2003. Governing as Governance. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Lasker, Roz, and Elisa Weiss. 2003. Broadening Participation in Community Problem Solving: A Multidisciplinary Model to Support Collaborative Practice and Research. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 80, no. 1: 14–60. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llera, Francisco, and Ángeles Lópes-Nórez. 2012. Cross-border Collaboration in Border Twin Cities: Lessons and Challenges for the Ciudad Juárez-El Paso and the Frankfurt (Oder)-Slubice. Ciudad Juárez: Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez.
   Google Scholar
• Lundén, Thomas. 2004. On the Boundary: About Humans at the End of the Territory. Stockholm: Elanders Gotab Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Master plan for Imatra. 2014. Alvar Aalto’s Architecture. http://file.alvaraalto.fi/search.php?id=027.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen, Ulf, and Bürkner Hans-Joachim. 2001. Antagonistic Structures in Border Areas: Local Milieu and Local Politics in the Polish-German Twin City Gubin/Guben. GeoJournal no. 54: 43–50. doi: 10.1023/A:1021136614586
   Google Scholar
• Meynhardt, Timo. 2009. Public Value Inside: What is Public Value Creation? International Journal of Public Administration 32, no. 3–4: 192–219. doi: 10.1080/01900690902732632
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, Antti, Heikki A. Loikkanen and Lasse Oulasvirta. 2010. Public Services at the Local Level – The Finnish Way. In Local Public Sector in Transition: A Nordic Perspective, ed. Moisio A. Helsinki, 155–184. https://www.vatt.fi/file/vatt_publication_pdf/j56.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Murmanskstat. 2012. Chislennost’ naseleniya na nachalo 2012 goda i v srednem za 2011 god [Population by the Beginning of 2012 and the Average Statistics for 2011]. http://murmanskstat.gks.ru.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquinelli, C. 2013. Competition, Cooperation and Co-Opetition: Unfolding the Process of Inter-Territorial Branding. Urban Research & Practice 6, no. 1: 1–18. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2012.727579
   Google Scholar
• Pechenga Rayon Administration. 2008. Sovmestnoe zayavlenie o sotrudnichestve munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya Pechengskiy rayon Murmanskoy oblasti (Rossiya) i kommunu Ser-Varanger guberniya Finnmark (Norvegiya) v ramkakh proekta “Goroda-Bliznetsy” ot 2 iyula 2008. [Joint declaration on cooperation in the frame of “Twin Cities Project” between Pechenga Rayon, Murmansk Oblast’, Russia and or-Varanger commune, Finnmark County, Norway]. http://pechengamr.ru.
   Google Scholar
• Ravbar, Marjan. 1999. General Characteristics of Border Areas in Slovenia. Geographica Slovenica 31: 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Roeber, Joerg. 2010. Towards an Ever-Closer Region? Explaining Administrative Cross-Border (Non-) Cooperation from the Vantage Point of Lake Constance. Paper presented at the EGPA Study Group on Regional and Local Government, September 8–10, 2010, IEP Toulouse.
   Google Scholar
• Rogova, Anastasiya. 2009. Chicken is Not a Bird, Kirkenes is Not Abroad. Borders and Territories in Perception of the Population in a Russia-Norwegian Borderland. Journal of Northern Studies 1: 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ryzhova, Natalya. 2008. Twin-Cities Fenomen gorodov-bliznetsov v kontekste transgranichnykh migratsionnykh protsessov (na primere Blagoveshchenska i Heihe) [Phenomen in the Context of Transborder Migration: The Case of Blagoveshchensk and Heihe]. In Regional Dimension of Transborder Migration to Russia, 184–203. Moscow: Aspect Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Helga. 2002. Twin Towns on the Border as Laboratories of European Integration, Arbeitsberichte Frankfurter Institut für Transformationsstudien, 4/2002, Frankfurt (O).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James. 1999 . European and North American Contexts for Cross-border Regionalism. Regional Studies 33, no. 7: 605–617.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James, Sárolta Németh, Matti Fritsch and Heikki Eskelinen. 2012 . Territorial Cohesion at the EU's External Border? A Finnish-Russian borderlands perspective. Paper presented at the 52nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association “Regions in Motion – Breaking the Path”, 21–25 August 2012, Bratislava, Slovakia. www-sre.wu.acat.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa12/e120821aFinal00628.pdf2.
   Google Scholar
• Sik, Endre, István Micsinai, and Márton Gerő. 2014. Cross-Border Coopetition: Forced from Above Fine-Tuned from Below. Paper presented at Ankara EUBORDERREGIONS project meeting on September 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sør-Varanger kommune. 2013a. Budsjett og økonomiplan 2013–2016. 147 p. http://www.svk.no/getfile.php/2380004.652.qvrdwarwsp/Budsjett+og+%C3%B8konomiplan+2013-2016+-+inkl+kommunestyrets+vedtak+den+12.12.12+-+rev+pr+februar+2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sør-Varanger kommune. 2013b. Tvillingbyer – Twin Cities: Kirkenes og Nikel [Twin cities: Kirkenes and Nikel] http://www.svk.no.
   Google Scholar
• Sputnik International. 2015. Bridge Linking Russia’s Amur Region with China to Cost Over $230 Million. http://sputniknews.com/asia/20150905/1026623567.html.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. 2012. www.ssb.no.
   Google Scholar
• Stoyanova, Neli, and Piet Kommers. 2002. Concept Mapping as a Medium of Shared Cognition in Computer-Supported Collaborative Problem Solving. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13, no. 1: 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Svetogorsk Administration. 2011. Annex to the Agreement on 20.01.1993 between Imatra (Finland) and Svetogorsk (Russia). Protocol No. 19 [Prilozhenie K Dogovoru ot 20-ogo Yanvarya 1993 goda mezhdu gorodami Imatra (Finlyandiya) i Svetogorsk (Rossiya). Protokol No. 19]. http://www.svetogorsk-city.ru/about/programs/.
   Google Scholar
• Svetogorsk municipality. 2013. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya “Svetogorskoe gorodskoe poselenie” [Social and Economic Development of the Municipality “Urban Settlement of Svetogorsk”]. http://www.svetogorsk-city.ru/city/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Tsagarousianou, Roza. 2004. Rethinking the Concept of Diaspora: Mobility, Connectivity and Communication in a Globalised World. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture no. 1: 52–65. https://www.westminster.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/20219/005WPCC-Vol1-No1-Roza_Tsagarousianou.pdf. doi: 10.16997/wpcc.203
   Google Scholar
• Viken, Arvid, Brynhild Granås, and Toril Nyseth. 2008. Kirkenes: An Industrial Site Reinvented as a Border Town. Acta Borealia: A Nordic Journal of Circumpolar Societies 25, no. 1: 22–44. doi: 10.1080/08003830802302869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar