Cross-Border Collaboration in Economic Development: Institutional Change on the Anglo-Scottish Border

References

• Asheim, B., R. Boschma, and P. Cooke. 2011. Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Regional Studies 45, no. 7: 893–904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. 1999. Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies 36, no. 1: 59–72. doi: 10.1080/0042098993736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Border Visions Partnership. 2002. Report on the Third Anglo-Scottish Border Conference on “Rural Renaissance”, October, in Slaley Hall, Hexham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Border Visions Partnership. 2003. Report on the Fourth Anglo-Scottish Border Conference on “Border Visions not Divisions,” October, Easterbrook Hall, Dumfries, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breda-Vàsquez, I., P. Conceicao, and R. Fernandes. 2009. Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal. Urban Studies 46, no. 10: 2213–38. doi: 10.1177/0042098009339433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, M. 2000. Urban Partnerships, Governance and the Regeneration of Britain’s Cities. International Planning Studies 5, no. 3: 273–97. doi: 10.1080/713672858
   Google Scholar
• Carley, M. 2006. Partnership and Statutory Local Governance in a Devolved Scotland. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19, no. 3: 250–60. doi: 10.1108/09513550610658213
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, A. 2005. Partnership Overload in North West Birmingham. Public Policy and Administration 20, no. 3: 90–105. doi: 10.1177/095207670502000308
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., F. Durand, C. Sohn, and O. Walther. 2013. Comparing Cross-Border Metropolitan Integration in Europe: Towards a Functional Typology. Journal of Borderlands Studies 28, no. 2: 221–37. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2013.854654
   Google Scholar
• Dolzblasz, S. 2015. Symmetry or Asymmetry? Cross-Border Openness of Service Providers in Polish-Czech and Polish-German Border Towns. European Countryside 5, no. 2: 102–14.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. 1997. Urban Policy: The Victory of form Over Substance? Urban Studies 34, Nos. 5–6: 825–43. doi: 10.1080/0042098975844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., M. Goodwin, S. Pemberton, and M. Woods. 2000. Partnership Working in Rural Regeneration: Governance and Empowerment? Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. 2000. Tackling Social Exclusion in the European Union? The Limits to the New Orthodoxy of Local Partnership. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24, no. 4: 782–800. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. 2006. Partnership and the Limits to Local Governance in England: Institutionalist Analysis and Neoliberalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30, no. 1: 76–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00645.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D.C., A.E.G. Jonas, S. Reimer, and D.J. Spooner. 2001. Governance, Institutional Capacity and Partnerships in Local Economic Development: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Evidence from the Humber Sub-Region. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26, no. 1: 103–19. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, A. 1996. Unravelling the Process of ‘Partnership’ in Urban Regeneration Policy. Urban Studies 33, no. 2: 253–68. doi: 10.1080/00420989650011997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, N. 2013. Effective Strategy Implementation: Why Partnership Interconnectivity Matters. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31, no. 1: 82–101. doi: 10.1068/c11155r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons. 2015. Our Borderlands – Our Future: Final Report Scottish Affairs Committee Sixth Report of Session 2014–15, March.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, K., and M. Trippl. 2013. Distance, Proximity and Types of Cross-border Innovation Systems: A Conceptual Analysis. Regional Studies 47, no. 3: 450–60. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.560933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, M. 1992. Partnership: Issues of Policy and Negotiation. Local Economy 7, no. 3: 210–24. doi: 10.1080/02690949208726149
   Google Scholar
• McQuaid, R.W. 1999. The Role of Partnerships in Urban Economic Regeneration. International Journal of Public-Private Partnerships 2, no. 1: 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• McQuaid, R. 2000. The Theory of Partnerships – Why have Partnerships. In Managing Public-Private Partnerships for Public Services: An International Perspective, ed. S.P. Osborne, 9–35. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McQuaid, R. 2010. Theory of Organizational Partnerships: Partnership Advantages, Disadvantages and Success Factors. In The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, ed. S.P. Osborn, 127–48. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nauwelaers, C., K. Maguire, and G. Ajmone Marsan. 2013. Ireland-Northern Ireland (United Kingdom). In Regions and Innovation, Collaborating Across Borders. OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/The_case_of_Ireland-Northern-Ireland.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., and S. Zadek. 2000. Partnership Alchemy: New Social Partnerships in Europe. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Centre.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Regions and Innovation: Collaborating Across Borders, OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Payan, T. 2014. Theory-building in Border Studies: The View from North America. Eurasia Border Review 5, no. 1: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Schmuecker, K., G. Lodge, and L. Godall. 2012. Borderland: Assessing the Implications of a more Autonomous Scotland for the North of England; IPPR North, Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2013. Scotland’s Future: Your Guide to an Independent Scotland. November ISBN 978-1-78412-068-9.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., F. Peck, G. Mulvey, K. Jackson, and J. Blackie. 2015. Developing the Framework for a Borderland Strategy Produced by the Universities of Northumbria and Cumbria on behalf of the Association of North-East Councils and the Institute for Local Governance, November.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., J. Blackie, F. Robinson, and G. Henderson. 2013. Borderlands: Can the North East and Cumbria benefit from greater Scottish Autonomy? An independent report produced on behalf of the Association of North East Councils by Universities of Northumbria and Durham and IPPR North.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., F. Peck, M. Holme, and T. Knowles. 2002. The Regional Impact of Border Television, Report commissioned by Border TV from the Centre for Regional Economic Development and Centre for Border Studies at Northumbria University, Carlisle Campus, August.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. 2010. Developing Cross-Border Regional Innovation Systems: Key Factors and Challenges. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101, no. 2: 150–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar